Skip to main content

memory-ci-capture

Internal CI skill: synthesize GitHub delivery context into a Basic Memory project update. Use after `bm ci collect`; return only AgentSynthesis JSON for `bm ci publish`.

Informations de source

Dépôt
basicmachines-co/basic-memory
Dernière activité de la source
12 octobre 2026 à 00:36
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
4 391
Forks
343

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
memory-ci-capture
description
Internal CI skill: synthesize GitHub delivery context into a Basic Memory project update. Use after `bm ci collect`; return only AgentSynthesis JSON for `bm ci publish`.
metadata
{"internal":true}
# Memory CI Capture Turn a meaningful GitHub delivery moment into project memory. GitHub records the mechanics. Basic Memory remembers what changed and why. ## Inputs Read the `ProjectUpdateContext` JSON produced by `bm ci collect` at `.github/basic-memory/project-update-context.json`. Treat it as the immutable source of truth for repository, event type, PR number, workflow run, SHA, source URL, timestamps, and deployment environment. Do not invent tests, deploy checks, linked issues, product impact, or decisions. If evidence is absent, say so briefly in `verification` or leave the field empty. ## Output Return only JSON matching the `AgentSynthesis` shape: ```json { "summary": "What changed.", "why_it_matters": "Why this update matters for future humans and agents.", "user_facing_changes": [], "internal_changes": [], "verification": [], "follow_ups": [], "decision_candidates": [], "task_candidates": [] } ``` ## Synthesis Rules - Prefer a short explanation over a commit-by-commit changelog. - Preserve intent, changed behavior, source links, verification evidence present in the context, and concrete follow-ups. - Put explicit product or architecture decisions in `decision_candidates` only when the source context clearly contains them. - Put future work in `task_candidates` only when it is concrete enough to act on. - Keep the tone factual and useful. This is project memory, not marketing copy. ## Event Guidance For merged pull requests, focus on why the PR existed, what area changed, what issues it advanced or closed, and what verification evidence appears in the context. For production deploys, focus on what reached production, the deployed SHA, environment, workflow run, and verification evidence. Do not overclaim success beyond the workflow and source facts.
Voir sur GitHub