p5qm-pick-5-question-me

name	p5qm - Pick 5 Question Me
description	Interactive skill selection through elimination questions. Asks 3-5 discriminating questions to narrow the full library down to 5 targeted skills. Standalone implementation of the QUESTION algorithm from /pick with N=5.
tier	tier4
categories	["Meta & Navigation"]
tags	["shortcut","pick","discovery","question","interactive","elimination"]
output	{"format":"prose"}

Pick 5 Question Me

Input: $ARGUMENTS

---

Core Principles

1. Questions are filters, not surveys. Each question must eliminate at least 50% of remaining candidates. A question that eliminates 10% is not worth asking. Maximize information gain per question.

2. Binary and multiple-choice only. Open-ended questions produce ambiguous answers that are hard to filter on. Every question must have 2-5 discrete options, each mapping to a clear pool reduction.

3. Three questions should suffice. With good questions, 3 binary questions reduce the pool by 87.5%. For a library of 400+ skills, 3-4 questions narrow to a manageable candidate set. 5 questions is the maximum — after that, just pick.

4. Implicit answers from context. If $ARGUMENTS contains information that answers a question, skip that question and apply the filter automatically. Don't ask what you already know.

5. Elimination, then quality ranking. Questions eliminate; they don't rank. After elimination narrows the pool, use the USEFUL algorithm (tier + connectivity + breadth + depth) to pick the best 5 from survivors.

---

Phase 1: Context Extraction

Before asking questions, extract any implicit answers from $ARGUMENTS.

[A] CONTEXT: [from $ARGUMENTS]

[B] IMPLICIT_ANSWERS:
    Step 1: Does context reveal the user's PURPOSE?
        (a) understand → analysis skills
        (b) decide → decision skills
        (c) create → creation skills
        (d) fix → diagnostic skills
        → ANSWER: [a/b/c/d/none]

    Step 2: Does context reveal the DOMAIN?
        (a) technical
        (b) business
        (c) personal
        (d) any
        → ANSWER: [a/b/c/d/none]

    Step 3: Does context reveal the SCOPE?
        (a) specific project/task
        (b) general capability building
        (c) a feeling or situation
        → ANSWER: [a/b/c/none]

    Step 4: Does context reveal the DEPTH?
        (a) quick answer
        (b) thorough analysis
        (c) deep dive
        → ANSWER: [a/b/c/none]

[C] QUESTIONS_SKIPPED: [list questions answered by context]
[D] POOL_AFTER_CONTEXT: [size after applying implicit filters]

---

Phase 2: Discriminating Questions

Ask only the questions not already answered by context. Present to user.

Question Bank (ordered by information gain)

[E] QUESTION_SEQUENCE:

Q1: PURPOSE (eliminates ~75%)
    "Are you trying to:
     (a) understand something
     (b) decide something
     (c) create something
     (d) fix something?"
    Filter:
        (a) → keep analysis, exploration, research skills
        (b) → keep decision, comparison, evaluation skills
        (c) → keep creation, writing, planning skills
        (d) → keep diagnostic, debugging, recovery skills

Q2: SCOPE (eliminates ~66%)
    "Is this about:
     (a) a specific project or task
     (b) a general capability you want to build
     (c) a feeling, frustration, or situation you're in?"
    Filter:
        (a) → keep execution-oriented, project-specific skills
        (b) → keep meta-skills, frameworks, general-purpose tools
        (c) → keep emotional, navigational, self-assessment skills

Q3: DEPTH (eliminates ~50%)
    "How much time do you have?
     (a) I need a quick answer
     (b) I want a thorough analysis
     (c) I want to go as deep as possible"
    Filter:
        (a) → prefer tier1, simple-output skills; exclude deep frameworks
        (b) → prefer tier1-2, moderate-depth skills
        (c) → prefer compound skills, deep frameworks, multi-step processes

Q4: DOMAIN (eliminates ~75%, but less essential)
    "What domain?
     (a) technical / engineering
     (b) business / strategy
     (c) personal / interpersonal
     (d) doesn't matter"
    Filter:
        (a-c) → keep domain-matching skills
        (d) → no filter

Q5: NOVELTY (eliminates ~50%, optional)
    "Do you want:
     (a) proven, well-known approaches
     (b) something you probably haven't tried before"
    Filter:
        (a) → prefer tier1-2, high-connectivity
        (b) → prefer tier3-4, low-connectivity, experimental

---

Phase 3: Pool Reduction and Selection

[F] REDUCTION_LOG:

    Starting pool: [N] skills
    Q1 answer: [X] → Pool: [N1] skills
    Q2 answer: [X] → Pool: [N2] skills
    Q3 answer: [X] → Pool: [N3] skills
    [Q4 answer: [X] → Pool: [N4] skills — if asked]
    [Q5 answer: [X] → Pool: [N5] skills — if asked]

    Final candidate pool: [N_final] skills

[G] SELECTION:
    IF pool > 5:
        → Apply USEFUL scoring (tier + connectivity + breadth + depth)
        → Take top 5
    IF pool <= 5:
        → Return all
    IF pool = 0:
        → Loosen most recent filter; retry

---

Phase 4: Output

ALGORITHM: QUESTION
QUESTIONS ASKED: [N]
POOL REDUCTION: [starting] → [final] skills

QUESTIONS ASKED:
  Q1: [question] → Answer: [answer] → Pool: [before] → [after]
  Q2: [question] → Answer: [answer] → Pool: [before] → [after]
  [Q3-Q5 if asked...]

SKIPPED (answered by context):
  [question] → implicit answer: [answer] → Pool: [before] → [after]

PICKED 5 SKILLS (from [final pool] candidates):
  1. /[id] — [title]
     Why this survived: [which filters it passed and why it ranks high]
     Tier: [tier] | Category: [category]

  2. /[id] — [title]
     Why this survived: [filters + ranking]
     Tier: [tier] | Category: [category]

  [continue to 5...]

IF NONE FIT:
  The elimination may have been too aggressive.
  Try: /p10diverse (broad coverage) or /p10for [describe your situation]

---

Failure Modes

Failure	Signal	Fix
Low-information questions	Question eliminates < 25% of pool	Reorder: ask highest-elimination questions first
Over-elimination	Pool reaches 0 before 5 questions asked	Loosen most recent filter; use fewer questions
Open-ended questions	Question has no discrete options	Rewrite with 2-5 concrete choices
Ignoring context	Asking a question that $ARGUMENTS already answers	Always extract implicit answers first
All questions asked	Asking 5 questions when 3 would have sufficed	Stop asking when pool < 15 — just rank
Quality ranking skipped	Returning 5 arbitrary survivors instead of best 5	After elimination, apply USEFUL scoring to rank

---

Depth Scaling

Depth	Context Extraction	Questions	Selection
1x	None — ask all questions	3 questions	Take first 5 from survivors
2x	Extract implicit answers, skip known	3-4 questions with elimination logging	USEFUL scoring on survivors
4x	Deep context analysis + domain inference	Adaptive questions based on pool state	USEFUL scoring + justification per pick
8x	Full context modeling	Custom questions designed for maximum discrimination	Multi-criteria ranking + alternative sets

Default: 2x. These are floors.

---

Pre-Completion Checklist

• Context from $ARGUMENTS analyzed for implicit answers
• Each question eliminates at least 50% of remaining pool
• No more than 5 questions asked
• Pool reduction logged at each step
• Final selection uses USEFUL scoring (not arbitrary)
• Exactly 5 skills returned (or all if pool < 5)
• Each pick explains why it survived the filters

---

Integration

• Shortcut for: /pick 5 question me $ARGUMENTS
• Use when: You don't know what you need and want guided discovery
• Routes to: The 5 picked skills; re-run with different answers for different results
• Related: /p10for (situation-based, no questions needed), /meta (orientation)
• Differs from /p10for: for infers needs from a situation description; qm asks explicitly
• Differs from /meta: meta provides orientation to the whole system; qm narrows to 5 specific skills
• Differs from /p5want: want assumes a desire is stated; qm asks questions to discover it