name	cursor-review
description	Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES.
description-en	Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES.
description-ja	Cursor Composer に advisory second opinion としてレビューさせるスキル。cursor:review、Cursor にレビューして、composer で差分を sanity check して、という時に使う。primary verdict は常に host brain が持ち、Cursor は APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES を所有しない。
allowed-tools	["Read","Bash","Grep"]
argument-hint	[--base <ref>] [review-scope]
user-invocable

cursor:review - Advisory Cursor Review

Cursor Composer (composer-2.5-fast) を read-only second opinion として使う review skill。primary verdict は host brain (Opus / Claude role) が出す。

Quick Reference

cursor:review --base origin/main cursor:review "Phase 88.5 command namespace diff"

Rules

Cursor review is advisory. The final verdict must come from the host reviewer.

Do not pass --write to cursor-companion.sh.

Use resolver/model routing, not direct env checks:

bash scripts/resolve-impl-backend.sh --backend cursor --role reviewer
bash scripts/model-routing.sh --host cursor --role worker --field model

Prefer the existing harness-review contract when a full review is requested. This command exists for users who explicitly ask for the Cursor lane.

Flow

Resolve the Harness helper root:

HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT="${HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}}"
if [ -z "$HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT" ] && [ -n "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR:-}" ]; then
  probe="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" && pwd)"
  while [ "$probe" != "/" ] && [ ! -d "$probe/scripts" ]; do
    probe="$(cd "$probe/.." && pwd)"
  done
  [ -d "$probe/scripts" ] && HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT="$probe"
fi
if [ -z "$HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT" ]; then
  echo "ERROR: HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT is not set and could not be derived from CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT or CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR" >&2
  exit 2
fi

Determine review scope:

BASE_REF="${TASK_BASE_REF:-origin/main}"
REVIEW_SCOPE="${ARGUMENTS:-}"
if [ -n "${REVIEW_SCOPE}" ]; then
  set -- ${REVIEW_SCOPE}
  while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
    case "$1" in
      --base)
        BASE_REF="${2:?--base requires a ref}"
        shift 2
        ;;
      --base=*)
        BASE_REF="${1#--base=}"
        shift
        ;;
      *)
        shift
        ;;
    esac
  done
fi
DIFF_STAT="$(git diff --stat "${BASE_REF}..HEAD")"
DIFF_TEXT="$(git diff "${BASE_REF}..HEAD")"

Ask Cursor in read-only mode:

PROMPT="$(cat <<EOF

Review this diff as an advisory second opinion. Base ref: ${BASE_REF} Requested scope: ${ARGUMENTS:-full diff}

Focus on bugs, regressions, missing tests, and unsafe assumptions. Do not propose broad refactors.

Diff stat: ${DIFF_STAT}

Diff: ${DIFF_TEXT} EOF )" bash "${HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/cursor-companion.sh" task "${PROMPT}"

4. Host reads Cursor's output and performs the primary review: - Findings first, ordered by severity. - Mark Cursor-originated points as advisory when used. - `APPROVE` / `REQUEST_CHANGES` must be the host decision, not a copied Cursor verdict. ## Output Use the standard review shape: - findings - open questions - validation run - final host verdict

cursor-review

Options d'installation

Vérifiez les fichiers source

cursor:review - Advisory Cursor Review

Quick Reference

Rules

Flow

cursor-review

Informations de source

Options d'installation

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Plus depuis ce dépôt

Plus depuis ce dépôt

cursor:review - Advisory Cursor Review

Quick Reference

Rules

Flow