Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion. Use when the user mentions "lead magnet", "quiz funnel", "assessment tool", "lead generation", or "score-based segmentation". Covers question design, dynamic results by tier, and automated follow-up sequences. For landing page conversion, see cro-methodology. For full marketing plans, see one-page-marketing. Trigger with 'scorecard', 'marketing'.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion. Use when the user mentions "lead magnet", "quiz funnel", "assessment tool", "lead generation", or "score-based segmentation". Covers question design, dynamic results by tier, and automated follow-up sequences. For landing page conversion, see cro-methodology. For full marketing plans, see one-page-marketing. Trigger with 'scorecard', 'marketing'.
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep
license
MIT
author
Wondelai <hello@wondelai.com>
version
1.0.1
compatible-with
claude-code, codex, openclaw
tags
["business","scorecard-marketing"]
Scorecard Marketing Skill
A proven 4-step system for generating qualified leads through interactive assessments. This approach generates warm leads with rich data about each prospect.
Core Principle
Everything is downstream from lead generation. People buy to resolve psychological tension between their current reality and desired reality. A scorecard awakens dormant desires by asking revealing questions.
The foundation: While people actively searching are harder to sell to (already decided, set budget), those with dormant desires buy from whoever helped them uncover the need. A well-designed scorecard converts 30-50% of visitors vs. 3-10% for traditional PDF lead magnets, because interactive assessments create psychological engagement that static content cannot.
Scoring
Goal: 10/10. When reviewing or creating assessment funnels or quiz landing pages, rate them 0-10 based on adherence to the principles below. A 10/10 means full alignment with all guidelines; lower scores indicate gaps to address. Always provide the current score and specific improvements needed to reach 10/10.
The 4-Step Scorecard System
1. Landing Page
Core concept: The landing page exists for one purpose: get visitors to start the questionnaire. It must create enough curiosity and promise enough value that clicking "Start" feels irresistible.
Why it works: A concept hook taps into a dormant desire the visitor didn't know they had. By framing the assessment around a score, you trigger the primal drive to measure, rank, and improve oneself. The combination of curiosity and low commitment ("takes 3 minutes") removes friction.
Key insights:
The concept hook is the single most important element; it defines what visitors score themselves on
"Moving toward" hooks ("Are you ready to [goal]?") outperform fear-based hooks
The 3 Cs (Clarity, Credibility, Connection) must all be present on the page
Time expectation ("Takes less than 3 minutes") reduces abandonment before start
Product applications:
Context
Landing Page Element
Example
Concept hook
Frame around a score visitors want
"What's Your Marketing Score?"
Moving toward
Goal-oriented hook
"Are you ready to scale your business?"
Removing pain
Pain-relief hook
"Reduce your hiring frustration - take this quiz"
Readiness check
Decision validation hook
"Should you launch a second location? Complete this checklist"
Category discovery
Identity/type hook
"What type of entrepreneur are you?"
Copy patterns:
"[HEADLINE: Concept hook + promise] Are you ready to [desired outcome]?"
"Answer [X] quick questions to discover [specific insight] and get personalized recommendations"
"3 bullet benefits: Find out where you're strong / Identify areas holding you back / Get actionable next steps tailored to you"
"Based on [X years] working with [X clients]. Featured in [publications]. Trusted by [names/logos]."
"[CTA BUTTON] Start the Quiz (Takes less than 3 minutes)"
Ethical boundary: The concept hook must promise value the assessment actually delivers. Never bait-and-switch with a compelling hook that leads to a sales pitch disguised as results.
Core concept: The questionnaire collects lead data while providing an engaging, gamified experience. It captures contact information first, then asks scored questions grouped into categories that surface the prospect's pain points, desires, and qualification signals.
Why it works: People enjoy answering questions about themselves (self-referential encoding). By capturing the email before questions begin, you retain the lead even if they abandon. Scored categories create a structured framework that makes results feel scientific and credible, increasing trust in the recommendations that follow.
Key insights:
Lead capture form goes first (name, email, optional phone) so you have data even on abandonment
Question count scales with funnel stage: 8-15 for cold-to-warm, 20-50 for warm-to-sales, 30-150 for client-to-fan
Group questions into 2-7 measurable categories (e.g., Marketing, Operations, Leadership)
Assign 1-5 points per answer and weight significant answers higher
Add qualifying questions in an "Uncategorised" group: budget, urgency, company size
Avoid salesy questions, leading questions, lookup questions, and jargon
Product applications:
Context
Question Type
Example
Yes/No
Checklist items
"Do you work out 3+ times/week?"
Sliding scale
Degree/frequency
"How important is X to you?"
Radio buttons
Single choice
"Which best describes your situation?"
Checkboxes
Multiple selections
"Which tools do you use?"
Open text
Rare, slows completion
"What has stopped you in the past?"
Copy patterns:
Questions should feel like a conversation, not an interrogation
Use "you" language: "How confident are you in your..." not "Rate your confidence level in..."
Category names should be meaningful to the respondent, not internal jargon
Progress indicators ("Question 5 of 12") reduce abandonment
Closing with "Almost done!" maintains momentum on longer assessments
Ethical boundary: Never disguise sales qualification as helpful assessment. Qualifying questions should be transparently useful to both parties. Avoid collecting data you do not need or will not use to improve the respondent's results.
See: references/psychology.md for the psychological foundations of question design and tension creation.
3. Results Page
Core concept: The results page delivers personalized value based on the respondent's score, creating tension between where they are and where they could be, while guiding them toward a clear next step calibrated to their tier.
Why it works: Personalized results trigger reciprocity (you gave them insight, they feel open to conversation), self-qualification (they told you their problems), and gamification (the primal drive to improve a score). Research shows 83% of consumers will share data for a personalized experience, and scored results feel more valuable than generic advice.
Key insights:
Show overall score plus category breakdown to highlight strengths and weaknesses
Dynamic content per tier ensures every respondent gets relevant advice, not generic filler
Default tiers are Low / Medium / High; custom tiers (e.g., "Startup / Scaleup / Performer / Unicorn") increase engagement
The sweet spot is prospects who score "strong foundations with room to improve" as they are most likely to convert
PDF reports (personalized cover, detailed recommendations) extend value and are shareable in sales meetings
Different CTAs per tier (Low: free event; Medium: book + discovery call; High: direct consultation)
Product applications:
Context
Results Element
Example
Overall score
Total across all categories
"Your Marketing Score: 67/100"
Category breakdown
Visual strengths/weaknesses
Spider chart showing 5 category scores
Low tier content
Easy first steps + nurture offer
"This area needs attention. Here are easy first steps..."
High tier content
Advanced offer + premium CTA
"Excellent foundation! We work with advanced clients on [offer]"
PDF report
Personalized downloadable document
Cover with name, detailed category analysis, recommendations
Copy patterns:
"Your [Topic] Score is [X]/[Total]. Here's what that means..."
"Your strongest area is [category]. Your biggest opportunity is [category]."
Low tier: "This area needs attention. Here are easy first steps... Our team specializes in helping people at your stage."
High tier: "Excellent foundation! Focus on maintaining standards. We work with advanced clients like yourself on [specific advanced offer]."
"Want to improve your score? Here's your personalized next step..."
Ethical boundary: Results must deliver genuine insight, not manufactured anxiety. Low scorers should receive actionable help, not just a sales pitch. Never inflate or deflate scores to push prospects toward a particular offer.
Core concept: The fourth step turns assessment data into a systematic sales and marketing engine. Promotion drives traffic to the landing page, while follow-up sequences segment leads by score tier and nurture them with relevant content toward a conversion event.
Why it works: Unlike cold outreach, scorecard-generated leads arrive with rich self-reported data: their pain points, qualification signals, and score. Sales conversations shift from discovery to recommendation because you already know their scores before the call. Automated segmentation means every lead gets relevant follow-up without manual sorting.
Key insights:
Promotion channels include LinkedIn polls, Facebook/Google ads, email to existing lists, podcast CTAs, and book QR codes
Automated email with results + PDF fires immediately after completion
Abandon emails recover leads who started but did not finish
Post a poll asking which scorecard concept they prefer
Paid traffic
Facebook/Google ads to landing page
"What's Your Leadership Score? Take the free quiz"
Follow-up
Automated results email
Email with score summary, PDF attachment, and CTA
Abandonment
Recovery email sequence
"You started the quiz but didn't finish. Your progress is saved."
Sales call
Data-informed conversation
Rep opens with "I see you scored 4/10 on Operations..."
Copy patterns:
"Take the [Topic] Scorecard" as a universal CTA across all channels
Abandon email: "You started the quiz but didn't finish. Pick up where you left off."
Results email: "Your [Topic] Score is ready. Here's what we recommend based on your results."
Sales outreach: "I noticed you scored well in [area] but [area] might be holding you back. Can we talk about that?"
Nurture: "Last week you scored [X] on [category]. Here are 3 ways to improve that score this month."
Ethical boundary: Follow-up must respect consent and provide genuine value. Never use assessment data to pressure or manipulate. Segmented emails should help, not just sell. Honor unsubscribe requests immediately and never share individual assessment data without permission.
This skill is based on the Scorecard Marketing methodology developed by Daniel Priestley. For the complete system, additional examples, and advanced strategies, read the original book:
Daniel Priestley is a serial entrepreneur, bestselling author, and a leading authority on modern business growth. He founded Dent Global, an accelerator that has helped thousands of entrepreneurs scale their businesses across the UK, Australia, Singapore, and the US. He co-founded ScoreApp, the platform built around the scorecard marketing methodology, which has been used to generate millions of leads. Priestley is the author of Key Person of Influence, Oversubscribed, 24 Assets, Entrepreneur Revolution, and Scorecard Marketing. He has been recognized with the Queen's Award for Enterprise and regularly speaks on entrepreneurship, marketing, and business strategy. His work focuses on helping businesses move from being one of many to becoming the obvious choice in their market.
Overview
Build quiz and assessment funnels that generate qualified leads at 30-50% conversion.
Prerequisites
Access to the logging environment or API
Required CLI tools installed and authenticated
Familiarity with logging concepts and terminology
Instructions
Assess the current state of the logging configuration
Identify the specific requirements and constraints
Apply the recommended patterns from this skill
Validate the changes against expected behavior
Document the configuration for team reference
Output
Configuration files or code changes applied to the project
