Menu
Multi-expert business analysis with advisory recommendations (no scoring gate)
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
Multi-expert AI/ML specification review with scoring gate — model architecture, evaluation rigor, safety/alignment, and production readiness for AI systems and LLM apps
Multi-expert architecture review — boundaries, integration patterns, failure modes, evolvability
Multi-expert intelligence pipeline review — discovery quality, ingestion resilience, scoring validity, platform compliance, taxonomy coherence, cost efficiency
Multi-expert mobile/native app specification review with scoring gate — Android, iOS, Swift, SwiftUI
Multi-expert personal-development review with scoring gate — learnability, adoption, human-centeredness, and capability impact for talent/learning/AI-augmentation designs
Multi-expert research and discovery panel with source evaluation, API feasibility, collection strategy, and intelligence gap analysis. Use when evaluating data sources, APIs, scraping strategies, OSINT collection plans, or any research/discovery effort that needs expert validation before implementation.
| name | sh-business-panel |
| description | Multi-expert business analysis with advisory recommendations (no scoring gate) |
/sh:business-panel [document_path_or_content] [--mode discussion|debate|socratic] [--focus competitive|growth|risk|communication] [--experts "name1,name2"] [--verbose]
--verbose): Full expert deliberations, cross-expert dialogue, and per-expert framework analysis before the synthesis.Silent mode still performs full internal analysis — quality is preserved, only the output is compressed.
/Users/jcords-macmini/projects/20_agentflow/experts/PANEL_PROTOCOL.md and apply its Grounding (non-code branch — every finding quotes the source section it rests on) and Refute Stage sections. Findings that misquote or cannot cite the source MUST NOT be reported./Users/jcords-macmini/projects/20_agentflow/experts/panels/business-panel.yaml for panel definition, focus areas, and auto-select rules (absolute path — relative paths fail when CWD is outside agentflow)/Users/jcords-macmini/projects/20_agentflow/experts/individuals/ for each selected expert — these contain domain, methodology, and critique focusauto-select keywords — add matching experts up to max-experts: 6 cap--focus area or use default-experts. --experts override replaces defaults entirelyNo scoring gate — this is an advisory panel. It produces strategic analysis and recommendations only.
| Expert | Domain |
|---|---|
| Clayton Christensen | Disruption Theory, Jobs-to-be-Done |
| Michael Porter | Competitive Strategy, Five Forces |
| Peter Drucker | Management Philosophy, MBO |
| Seth Godin | Marketing Innovation, Tribe Building |
| W. Chan Kim & Renee Mauborgne | Blue Ocean Strategy |
| Jim Collins | Organizational Excellence, Good to Great |
| Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Risk Management, Antifragility |
| Donella Meadows | Systems Thinking, Leverage Points |
| Jean-luc Doumont | Communication Systems, Structured Clarity |
--mode discussion)Collaborative analysis where experts build upon each other's insights through their frameworks. Default mode. Sequential commentary, cross-expert validation, consensus building.
--mode debate)Adversarial analysis for stress-testing ideas. Experts challenge each other's positions, surface disagreements, and argue alternatives. Use for controversial topics or high-stakes decisions.
--mode socratic)Question-driven exploration for deep strategic thinking. Experts pose probing questions rather than giving answers. Forces deeper examination of assumptions and alternatives.
Business analysis document containing:
AUTO-FIX, NOT SYNTHESIS-ONLY — when this panel reviews a written artifact (a spec, doc, or plan), it applies fixes for every finding automatically, per 00_Governance/CLAUDE.md §8 Panel Auto-Fix Policy — it never asks which to apply and never presents a menu. The only boundary it preserves: it does not execute real-world business decisions (make outward moves, spend, or code changes beyond the reviewed artifact) without approval — that is a reversibility guard, not finding-fix friction.
Fix ALL findings on the reviewed artifact automatically — high, medium, and low severity. Do not ask which findings to fix. Do not present a menu or an a/b/c choice. Fix everything, then report what was changed. Per 00_Governance/CLAUDE.md §8.