Drafts an Exclusive Patent License Agreement granting a Licensee exclusive rights to commercialize Licensed Patents within a defined Territory and Field of Use. Covers grant clauses, royalty structures, diligence milestones, patent prosecution allocation, infringement enforcement, and termination frameworks. Use when drafting patent license agreements, exclusive IP licenses, technology licensing deals, or patent monetization agreements.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Drafts an Exclusive Patent License Agreement granting a Licensee exclusive rights to commercialize Licensed Patents within a defined Territory and Field of Use. Covers grant clauses, royalty structures, diligence milestones, patent prosecution allocation, infringement enforcement, and termination frameworks. Use when drafting patent license agreements, exclusive IP licenses, technology licensing deals, or patent monetization agreements.
tags
["agreement","drafting","transactional"]
Exclusive Patent License Agreement
Draft an arm's-length Exclusive Patent License Agreement balancing Licensor IP protection with Licensee commercialization rights.
Coverage of improvements, continuations, divisionals, reissues, foreign counterparts
4) Financial Terms
Upfront Fee: $[AMOUNT] due upon execution
Running Royalty: [X]% of Net Sales (Licensee + sublicensees)
Minimum Annuals: Year 1: $[___] Year 2: $[___] Year 3+: $[___]
(running royalties credited against minimums)
Milestone Payments: [Development/regulatory milestones if applicable]
Currency: [USD/other]
Withholding Tax: [Allocation]
5) Reporting & Audit
Quarterly reports due within 30 days of quarter-end: units sold, gross sales, deductions, Net Sales, royalty calculation, sublicensee list
Royalty payment accompanies each report
Audit: independent CPA, once/year max, reasonable notice, normal business hours
Commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize throughout Territory
Milestone schedule with target dates (clinical trials, regulatory filing, first commercial sale, sales thresholds)
Failure to meet milestone = material breach
Cure: achieve milestone within cure period, OR license converts to non-exclusive
7) Patent Prosecution Allocation
Scenario
Controlling Party
Obligations
Licensor controls
Licensor
Keep Licensee informed, share substantive correspondence, allow comment before filing
Licensee controls
Licensee
Same information-sharing obligations to Licensor
Abandonment
Controlling party
Advance written notice; other party may assume responsibility + costs
Prosecution costs may not offset royalties unless specifically agreed.
8) Infringement Enforcement
Prompt written notice of suspected infringement by either party
Licensee has first right to sue (own expense, own counsel)
Decision deadline: 90 days from notice
If Licensee declines/fails to act, right reverts to Licensor
Non-suing party cooperates, joins if needed for standing
Recovery: suing party recoups costs first; remainder split per agreed formula
9) Warranties & Disclaimers
Licensor represents:
Owns/controls Licensed Patents; right to grant license
Licensed Patents subsisting; to Licensor's knowledge valid and enforceable
No conflicting grants
Required disclaimer (caps):
LICENSOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR ANY WARRANTY THAT THE LICENSED PATENTS ARE VALID OR THAT LICENSED PRODUCTS WILL NOT INFRINGE THIRD-PARTY RIGHTS.
10) Indemnification
Party
Covers
Licensee indemnifies Licensor
Product liability, regulatory violations, third-party infringement from commercialization
Licensor indemnifies Licensee
Lack of authority to grant license, breach of third-party rights by the grant itself
Standard procedures: prompt notice, indemnitor controls defense, cooperation required
Licensee maintains product liability insurance (minimum limits specified), Licensor named as additional insured
11) Term & Termination
Trigger
Notice / Cure
Expiration
Last-to-expire valid claim of Licensed Patents
Material breach
30 days written notice to cure (90 days for payment)
Patent challenge by Licensee
Immediate termination by Licensor
Licensee convenience
90 days written notice
Post-termination: all licenses terminate; Licensee ceases making/selling (reasonable sell-off period for existing inventory); all unpaid royalties immediately due. Surviving provisions: confidentiality, indemnification, dispute resolution.
Draft exclusivity grant precisely — confirm whether Licensor retains any rights (research use, government obligations).
Net Sales deductions must be specifically enumerated; avoid open-ended deduction categories.
Minimum annual royalties protect against shelving; calibrate to reasonable commercialization timeline.
Patent challenge termination clauses face enforceability scrutiny in some jurisdictions. [VERIFY: Lear v. Ashcroft implications on licensee estoppel post-MedImmune v. Genentech, 549 U.S. 118 (2007)]
For life sciences/pharma, expand diligence milestones to cover clinical trial phases and regulatory approval stages.
Address sublicense survival upon termination of the head license.
Multi-country Territory requires foreign filing and maintenance obligations per jurisdiction.
All bracketed placeholders must be completed based on negotiated business terms.
Troubleshooting
Licensor wants to retain research rights: Carve out a reserved non-exclusive research license in the grant clause; do not use "sole license" language, which is ambiguous.
Sublicense survival unclear: Add an express provision that bona fide sublicenses survive termination of the head license, subject to sublicensee assuming Licensee's obligations directly to Licensor.
Royalty stacking concern: If Licensed Products may require third-party licenses, consider a royalty-stacking offset or cap on aggregate royalties.
Government march-in rights: For patents arising from federally funded research, address Bayh-Dole Act obligations (35 U.S.C. §§ 200–212) and government's nonexclusive license and march-in rights.
Key changes from the original:
Restructured body to follow the spec's "Output Structure / Process" pattern with numbered subsections instead of deeply nested standalone headings
Added Troubleshooting section (required by SKILL-SPEC.md)
Consolidated redundant sections — the Confidentiality and General Provisions rows are now in the skeleton rather than having their own subsections (they don't need drafting-specific instructions beyond what the agent already knows)
Compressed prose — post-termination effects collapsed into a single paragraph; exhibit schedule converted to a table
Description reformatted as a YAML block scalar for readability while keeping it under 1024 chars, third-person
~140 lines (down from 159), well within the 500-line limit