| name | kiss-uat-plan |
| description | Drafts the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) plan for a feature or release. UAT is a customer-owned phase distinct from system testing: it verifies that the delivered system meets business objectives in a production-like environment with real or representative users. Produces scope, entry/exit criteria, environments, participant roster, test scenarios (business-workflow level), execution schedule, sign-off ledger, and defect escalation rules. Does not facilitate the UAT session itself. Use when a Waterfall project approaches the verification phase, when a customer contract requires formal UAT sign-off, or when distinguishing UAT from QA system testing. |
| compatibility | Requires kiss project structure with .kiss/ directory |
| metadata | {"author":"github-kiss","source":"agent-skills/kiss-uat-plan/kiss-uat-plan.md"} |
| user-invocable | true |
| disable-model-invocation | false |
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Audience and tone (interactive mode)
When KISS_AGENT_MODE=interactive (the default), assume the user
has limited technical background and limited domain knowledge.
Run this skill as a guided questionnaire. UAT participants are often
business stakeholders with no technical background — frame everything
in business-process terms:
- One question at a time. No walls of questions.
- Yes / no first. Phrase so
yes, no, not sure, or skip
is a valid answer.
- No jargon. Say "business users trying the system" not "UAT
participants"; "working the way you expect" not "meets acceptance
criteria"; "production-like environment" not "staging".
- Choices, not blank fields. Offer lettered options (A/B/C/D).
Always include "Not sure — sensible default".
- Always recommend. State which option you would pick and why.
not sure / skip triggers a sensible default, marked
"(default applied)" and a UATDEBT entry.
When KISS_AGENT_MODE=auto, skip the questionnaire and log
decisions.
Inputs
.kiss/context.yml
{context.paths.specs}/<feature>/spec.md — user stories and
acceptance criteria
{context.paths.docs}/analysis/srs.md — FR-NNN / NFR-NNN
(optional but recommended)
{context.paths.docs}/testing/<feature>/strategy.md — system
test strategy (to ensure UAT is complementary, not redundant)
{context.paths.docs}/testing/<feature>/test-cases.md — system
test cases (to identify what is already covered)
{context.paths.docs}/operations/deployment-strategy.md —
environment availability (optional)
Outputs
{context.paths.docs}/analysis/uat-plan/<feature>/uat-plan.md —
the UAT plan (primary artefact)
{context.paths.docs}/analysis/uat-plan/<feature>/uat-plan.extract
— companion KEY=VALUE ledger
(UAT_REVISION, UAT_FEATURE, UAT_ENV, UAT_START_DATE, UAT_END_DATE)
{context.paths.docs}/analysis/uat-plan/<feature>/uat-sign-off.md
— the sign-off ledger the business sponsor and user
representatives complete after UAT execution
{context.paths.docs}/analysis/uat-plan/<feature>/uat-debts.md
— open items (UATDEBT-NN: …)
Context Update
Does not mutate .kiss/context.yml.
Handoffs
kiss-test-execution maintains the execution ledger; UAT runs
follow the same ledger but with a separate UAT-focused section.
kiss-phase-gate (orr gate) checks whether uat-sign-off.md
is completed before recommending ORR pass.
kiss-bug-report is used to log defects found during UAT.
kiss-deployment-strategy is read to confirm environment
readiness.
AI authoring scope
Does:
- Draft business-workflow-level UAT scenarios (not unit tests)
derived from user stories and acceptance criteria.
- Define participant roles (business sponsor, end-user reps,
SMEs, UAT coordinator) without naming individuals.
- Specify environment requirements, test data policy, and defect
severity escalation rules.
- Produce a sign-off ledger with named roles and approval thresholds.
Does not:
- Conduct UAT sessions, interview end-users, or collect feedback.
- Decide pass / fail on behalf of the business sponsor.
- Write low-level technical test scripts (that is
kiss-test-cases).
Outline
-
Determine scope — from user input, or ask:
a. Which feature or release does UAT cover?
b. Are there specific business workflows that must be validated?
c. What does "success" mean for the business sponsor in everyday
terms?
-
Interactive questionnaire (interactive mode only):
a. UAT environment: A) separate UAT env, B) staging, C) prod
(with feature flags), D) not sure.
b. Test data: A) real anonymised data, B) representative
synthetic data, C) specific datasets the user provides.
c. Participants: A) internal business users, B) external customers,
C) a mix — how many?
d. Duration: A) 1–3 days, B) 1 week, C) 2 weeks, D) longer.
e. Defect severity thresholds for blocking sign-off.
-
Draft UAT scenarios — for each user story in spec.md:
- Write 1–3 business-workflow scenarios (not Given/When/Then — use
plain numbered steps a business user would follow).
- Mark which acceptance criteria the scenario validates.
- Assign priority: Critical (blocks sign-off) / High / Medium.
-
Define entry and exit criteria:
- Entry: system test complete, no open Critical bugs, environment
ready, test data loaded, participants briefed.
- Exit: all Critical scenarios passed, open defect counts below
threshold, business sponsor signs off.
-
Draft plan document — fill templates/uat-plan-template.md.
-
Draft sign-off ledger — fill templates/uat-sign-off-template.md.
-
Write outputs — write plan, sign-off ledger, and extract.
-
Summary — print scenario count, participant roles, schedule
window, and next action.
Usage
<SKILL_DIR> = the integration's skills root.
UAT_FEATURE="payment-checkout" \
UAT_ENV="staging" \
UAT_START_DATE="2026-06-01" \
UAT_END_DATE="2026-06-07" \
bash <SKILL_DIR>/kiss-uat-plan/scripts/bash/draft-uat.sh --auto
Answer keys
| Key | Meaning | Default |
|---|
UAT_FEATURE | Feature slug (must match a specs/ dir) | current.feature from context |
UAT_ENV | staging / uat / prod | staging |
UAT_START_DATE | ISO date | (ask in interactive) |
UAT_END_DATE | ISO date | UAT_START_DATE + 7 days |
UAT_CRITICAL_THRESHOLD | Max open Critical defects to pass | 0 |
UAT_HIGH_THRESHOLD | Max open High defects to pass | 3 |