Skip to main content

code-review

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

Informations de source

Dépôt
davila7/claude-code-templates
Dernière activité de la source
6 janvier 2026 à 13:31
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
32 559
Forks
3 747

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
code-review
description
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
# Sentry Code Review Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects. ## Review Checklist ### Identifying Problems Look for these issues in code changes: - **Runtime errors**: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access - **Performance**: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations - **Side effects**: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components - **Backwards compatibility**: Breaking API changes without migration path - **ORM queries**: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance - **Security vulnerabilities**: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure ### Design Assessment - Do component interactions make logical sense? - Does the change align with existing project architecture? - Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals? ### Test Coverage Every PR should have appropriate test coverage: - Functional tests for business logic - Integration tests for component interactions - End-to-end tests for critical user paths Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code. ### Long-Term Impact Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve: - Database schema modifications - API contract changes - New framework or library adoption - Performance-critical code paths - Security-sensitive functionality ## Feedback Guidelines ### Tone - Be polite and empathetic - Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism - Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?" ### Approval - Approve when only minor issues remain - Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences - Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code ## Common Patterns to Flag ### Python/Django ```python # Bad: N+1 query for user in users: print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user # Good: Prefetch related users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile') ``` ### TypeScript/React ```typescript // Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, []); // userId not in deps // Good: Include all dependencies useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, [userId]); ``` ### Security ```python # Bad: SQL injection risk cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}") # Good: Parameterized query cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id]) ``` ## References - [Sentry Code Review Guidelines](https://develop.sentry.dev/engineering-practices/code-review/)
Voir sur GitHub