learn

name

learn

description

Post-engagement knowledge harvest AND harness retrospective - after a box/bugbounty/pentest/CTF is completed, first diff how the engagement was EXECUTED against the skills/hooks that governed it (what discipline was skipped) and improve the harness, then sweep the whole engagement for GENERIC reusable knowledge NOT already in wiki/ and land it via the leak-gated stage->promote pipeline. Use at close-out or when asked to "extract learnings", "what did we learn", "harvest lessons into wiki", "distill this engagement", "post-mortem into the wiki", "what did we do wrong", "improve the harness from this box".

Learn: harness retrospective + wiki knowledge harvest

The close-out retrospective, in two phases:

• Phase 0 (process): diff how the engagement was EXECUTED against the discipline the skills/hooks prescribe, find where the operator (you) or the harness drifted, and fix the harness so the next box does not repeat it. This is the "improve the harness on it" half.
• Phases 1-7 (knowledge): read the WHOLE finished engagement, diff it against the existing wiki, and promote only the DELTA as durable, generic knowledge. The safety net that catches everything not captured live during the box.

The client-data boundary is enforced by code, not by this prose: engagement-derived content reaches wiki/ ONLY through wiki-stage.py -> wiki-promote.py, which runs check-leaks.sh and fails closed. This skill READS the engagement and WRITES only generic knowledge; it never edits the engagement's own files.

When it fires

• At close-out: run Skill(learn) once the engagement is marked ## STATUS: SOLVED (OWNED/ROOTED/COMPLETE) AND its walkthrough.md is assembled (the CLAUDE.md execution-loop close-out step). It self-clears the moment this skill writes <eng>/.learn-done.
• On demand: "extract learnings", "what did we learn", "harvest lessons", "distill", "post-mortem into the wiki" - the same steps apply.

Phase 0: Process retrospective (harness self-improvement) - DO FIRST

Before harvesting knowledge, ask: did we execute the way the skills/hooks told us to, and where we did not, whose fault is it - mine, or the harness's for not catching me? The point is not self-flagellation; it is to turn each drift into a concrete harness change so the next engagement cannot repeat it.

0a. Diff execution against discipline

Re-read the skills that governed this engagement (ctf-box, the hunt-* used, the CLAUDE.md execution loop) and check each mandated step against what actually happened on disk:

Discipline it prescribes	How to check it was (not) done	Common drift
Recon tooling complete (nmap AND ffuf AND nuclei-read for web)	ls targets/$ENG/recon/*.png, .recon-tools marker, tmux window names, log.md	ffuf never run; nuclei launched but output never read
Screenshot EVERY finding as it lands	count deliberate poc/*.png vs findings in paths.md; .screenshot-nudged	shots only at the very end; transient states lost
Wiki-first before exploiting each fingerprinted service	wiki queries in transcript / log.md	jumped to exploitation from memory
A hook nudge fired -> was it acted on?	grep the transcript for a nudge (e.g. "switch to ffuf") whose action never followed	nudge ignored under momentum
State-first / capture-as-you-go	state.md/loot.md updated mid-box vs all-at-end	prose-in-chat lost

If the engagement ran under the campaign driver (bb/pt/ctf-workflow), pull its own numbers - they say precisely where the driver fought the operator, no guessing:

python3 scripts/campaign.py --eng <ENG> ledger --json

drift = network calls the driver never emitted (improvisation off the board); dry_rounds / reframe_lenses_used = how hard the campaign had to reframe to find anything; paused_hosts = hosts that banned us; board.dead vs board.closed = the exhaustion-to-finding ratio. A high drift or a long lens list is the retro's starting point.

For each drift, name the root cause honestly: a skill that under-specified, a hook that should have fired a reflex but did not (or fired and was ignorable), or a me failure the harness had no mechanism to catch.

0b. Turn each drift into a harness change

Route each finding to its fix TARGET and make the change (small+clear -> apply now with the normal edit+test loop; larger -> record as a proposed item for operator approval):

• Reflex gap (a capture/coverage signal the harness could have caught) -> add/extend a hook in skills/hooks/ (stay within "reflexes = capture/route", NOT methodology), with a test in tests/. Run python3 -m pytest tests/ -q green before moving on.
• Discipline under-specified -> tighten the governing skill (ctf-box/hunt-*): make the step an explicit ordered checklist item, not buried prose. Skill bodies carry lesson PROSE + [[wikilink]] ONLY - never inline runnable exploit/rootkit/PoC code (magic-signal dumps, syscall PoCs, CVE exploits, reversing walks). That code is the KNOWLEDGE half: promote it to a wiki/ page through the Phase 5-6 gate and point the skill at it with a one-line "try X (see [[page]])". A skill body loads wholesale into model/API context on EVERY invocation, so raw offensive code there trips the Claude API safety classifier (real: ctf-box's LKM-rootkit + CVE-PoC lessons got flagged on load, forcing a manual purge) and bloats context. Prose that says WHAT to try in WHAT order belongs in the skill; the code that does it belongs in the wiki.
• Script/analyzer gap -> extend scripts/ (coverage, next_move, find-lint) to surface it.

0c. Log the retrospective (generic, tracked)

Append a dated section to docs/superpowers/harness-retro.md (create if missing): the drifts found, their root cause, and the harness change made or proposed. This doc is about the HARNESS, so it is generic and tracked - describe failures generically ("on a web box ffuf was skipped"), never with client host/IP/cred.

Naming the engagement in this tracked file: use its dir name ONLY when that name is a neutral codename (<platform>_<boxname>). Many engagement dirs are named after the target itself (a host, a product, a client short-name) - writing one of those into harness-retro.md publishes a client marker, and check-leaks.sh derives its marker list from targets/ dir names, so it WILL fail the gate. When the dir name is target-derived, describe the engagement generically instead ("a Symfony API target", "a single-host web bug-bounty campaign") and name nothing. Run bash scripts/check-leaks.sh after writing the retro; a FAIL here almost always means the dir name leaked.

0d. Fill the engagement's agent eval (per-engagement, gitignored)

targets/$ENG/eval.md (self-healed from _eval.md) has two halves - auto (real data) and judgement (you):

Auto first - REAL numbers, no estimation:

python3 scripts/eval_metrics.py $ENG --write

This injects a ## Metrics (auto) block from the hook telemetry (.events.jsonl) + the session transcript recorded in .metrics.json: exact skill / hook / tool call counts, auto-detected drift signals (every scope-guard block, state-discipline nudge, leak-warn), the start->finish time delta + idle-filtered active time, and the box's token usage (windowed to its active period). NEVER hand-type these - the transcript is ground truth (a real box's true output was ~12x an earlier hand-estimate).

Then the judgement half - only you can write it: in the same file, fill the Drift moments (what the auto drift-count can't say: WHY each drift happened + the one-line fix), What went right, and the Scores. The auto block counts drift; you narrate its cause. Dead-ends come from Deadends.md. Unlike the retro (generic, tracked), eval.md is per-engagement and may name specifics (gitignored targets/).

Only after Phase 0 is done, proceed to the knowledge harvest below.

Steps (Phases 1-7: wiki knowledge harvest)

1. Resolve the engagement

ENG=$(cat targets/active.md)
TYPE=$(grep -m1 engagement_type targets/$ENG/state.md | cut -d: -f2 | tr -d ' ')

Confirm close-out (## STATUS: heading in state.md) or that the operator asked explicitly. Do not harvest an in-flight engagement unless asked.

2. Inventory what the engagement taught

Read the full engagement and list every candidate GENERIC lesson:

• state.md - tech/service/version that mattered and how it was handled.
• loot.md - default or vendor-known creds (NOT client-set passwords).
• paths.md + walkthrough.md - the chain that actually worked, with exact commands.
• Deadends.md - what failed. Negative knowledge is reusable: a bypass that does NOT work on tech X, a default cred changed in vendor version Y, a false-positive pattern.
• Vuln-index.md / Vulns/ - findings and their reusable exploitation technique.
• killchain.md, log.md - anything else non-obvious that recurs.

A candidate is worth harvesting only if it is REUSABLE on the next engagement. Skip one-off client trivia.

3. Generalize + strip client specifics

Rewrite each candidate to its generic form: product + technique/cred/endpoint + impact. Drop every client host, IP, domain, and client-set credential value. Client specifics stay under targets/<eng>/. (The leak gate will refuse anything that slips through, but strip up front - do not lean on the gate.)

Compact to the DELTA, not a re-explanation. A staged candidate is the MINIMAL new reusable primitive + its one gotcha (a technique delta is typically < ~15 lines), NOT a re-teach of what the target page already covers. Before promote, re-read the target section (Phase 4) and cut every line already there -- keep ONLY what the wiki did not have. A verbose dump that repeats known material is a failed harvest even if it promotes.

4. Dedup against the wiki (the skip rule)

For each generic candidate, search the wiki first:

mcp__wiki-search__qmd_query   # semantic: concept / technique / intent
mcp__wiki-search__qmd_search  # keyword: exact tool name, CVE id, payload string

Find the home page (one class = one page). Read only its frontmatter and the relevant section. If the technique/payload/cred is ALREADY covered there, SKIP it - wiki has it. Keep only the delta. This step is the whole point: "extract stuff we haven't had yet".

5. Route each survivor through stage

Never hand-edit wiki/ with engagement-derived content. Stage it:

# default / vendor-known credential -> the cred cheatsheet
python3 scripts/wiki-stage.py --kind default-cred --slug <product>-default \
  --body '| <product> | <version> | <user> | <pass> | observed | <generic note> |'

# reusable request / payload pattern -> the api-request cheatsheet
python3 scripts/wiki-stage.py --kind api-pattern --slug <product>-<endpoint> \
  --body '| <product> | <endpoint> | <method> | <request/payload> | <auth> | <reveals> |'

# technique / bypass / tool-gotcha that ENRICHES an existing page
python3 scripts/wiki-stage.py --kind technique --slug <slug> \
  --target-page techniques/<area>/<page>.md
# then edit targets/$ENG/wiki-candidates/<slug>.md to hold the generic '## Heading' body

Genuinely new class with no home page: wiki-promote merges into an EXISTING page and skips a missing target. So first create a CONTENT-FREE generic scaffold (frontmatter per docs/page-types.md + the section headings only, zero engagement data), then stage the body against it so the substance still arrives through the gate:

# 1. scaffold wiki/techniques/<area>/<slug>.md: frontmatter + empty section headings
# 2. stage the generic body:
python3 scripts/wiki-stage.py --kind technique --slug <slug> \
  --target-page techniques/<area>/<slug>.md

For an external source that also informs the lesson (a CVE writeup, an advisory), hand that part to Skill(research-ingest) rather than duplicating it here.

6. Promote through the leak gate

python3 scripts/wiki-promote.py --list            # review pending candidates
python3 scripts/wiki-promote.py --review <slug>    # read one in full
python3 scripts/wiki-promote.py --promote all      # leak-checked merge + re-index

Promote runs check-leaks.sh on each body and refuses (writes nothing) on a client marker. Report what promoted, what was refused, and why. --promote also appends a generic delta-yield tally (date, engagement_type, count) to docs/wiki-delta-log.md; a zero-yield harvest is worth a sanity check (was the sweep actually run, or is the wiki already saturated for this box).

7. Re-index, lint, self-clear

python3 scripts/lint-wiki.py -q        # must be clean (broken links, stale index)
# only if a NEW page was created:
python3 scripts/gen_index.py && python3 scripts/build_moc.py && qmd update
touch targets/$ENG/.learn-done         # marks this engagement's learn pass done

Log one GENERIC line to session/log.md (e.g. "learn: promoted 3 -> jwt-attacks, default-credentials") and an audit line to targets/$ENG/log.md. Never put a client host/IP/domain in either.

Guardrails

• Generic only, gate-enforced. All engagement-derived writes go stage -> promote; the leak check is the code boundary. A new page is a content-free scaffold; its substance still comes through the gate.
• Dedup first. Enrich the existing page; do not create a second page for a class wiki already covers. qmd before staging, every time.
• No fabrication. Harvest only what the engagement files actually record. If a lesson is not backed by the state/loot/paths/walkthrough/Deadends record, drop it.
• Read-only on the engagement. Phase 0 may edit HARNESS files (skills/, skills/hooks/, scripts/, tests/, docs/superpowers/harness-retro.md) and Phases 1-7 write to wiki/ (via the gate) and the .learn-done marker - but NEVER the engagement's own findings/narrative.
• No offensive code in a skill body. A tightened skill (ctf-box/hunt-*) gets lesson prose + [[wikilinks]] only. Runnable exploit/rootkit/PoC code lives in wiki/ (through the Phase 5-6 gate) and is referenced by link, never inlined - the skill loads into API context wholesale and the classifier flags raw offensive code (it has). Reversing walks, syscall PoCs, magic-signal dumps, CVE exploits = wiki page + a one-line skill pointer.
• Phase 0 changes ship green. Any hook/script edit lands with a test and a passing python3 -m pytest tests/ -q; do not leave the harness broken by an improvement.
• Retro log is generic + tracked. harness-retro.md describes harness failures generically (no client host/IP/cred); the leak boundary still applies.

Report: Phase 0 - drifts found, root cause each, harness changes made vs proposed, retro-log path, test status. Phases 1-7 - candidates found, skipped-as-already-in-wiki, staged, promoted, refused, pages touched (and any new page created), lint status.