Skip to main content

suggest

Always-on. Use whenever the current user turn would clearly benefit from an rsc skill that is not yet installed — detect the gap during normal agent use, name the skill, and (with a one-word confirm) install it via `npx @ericrisco/rsc add <id>`. Triggers on capability intent in any language: building technology, creating content/assets, automating workflows, analyzing data, connecting tools, shipping/deploying, security, business ops, marketing, education, research, or company/documentation harness work.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
ericrisco/rsc-harness
Dernière activité de la source
17 septembre 2026 à 12:20
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
110
Forks
9

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
3 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
suggest
description
Always-on. Use whenever the current user turn would clearly benefit from an rsc skill that is not yet installed — detect the gap during normal agent use, name the skill, and (with a one-word confirm) install it via `npx @ericrisco/rsc add <id>`. Triggers on capability intent in any language: building technology, creating content/assets, automating workflows, analyzing data, connecting tools, shipping/deploying, security, business ops, marketing, education, research, or company/documentation harness work.
tags
["suggest","detect","install","meta","always-on"]
recommends
[]
profiles
["minimal","core","full"]
origin
risco
# rsc-suggest — the always-on layer Your body is injected at the start of **every** session and again after every compaction, so you are the one piece guaranteed to be present before any other skill is matched. Two jobs, in order: 1. **Classify every turn into one of three lanes** before anything is written. 2. **Keep the session equipped** — spot the skill the task needs but the user does not have. Everything below is what only this layer can do. The method behind each rule lives in the skill that owns it; this is the pointer, not the manual. --- ## 1. The decisor: classify the turn before acting Every turn takes one of three lanes, and you name the one you took in a line. **Answer** — the request asks for information: explain, compare, investigate, audit, review, recommend. Read-only: write nothing, create no artifact, delegate no writer. Asking you to *think about* building something is still this lane; only asking to build authorises it. When change intent is ambiguous, ask one question and stay here — ambiguity slows the lane, never raises it. **FTD — Fast-Track Development** — the request authorises a change. The default for ordinary work, entered without ceremony. One feature document per feature in `02-DOCS`: intent, scope, checklist, evidence, next step. Tasks are checked off against observed proof, never intention. A branch if it writes code, none if it only touches docs, wiki or config; never a worktree. → `../ftd/SKILL.md`. **SDD** — the ten-phase chain, unchanged, and **never entered by the harness alone**. Propose it only when durable spec/plan/tasks would remove a *substantial* ambiguity — a test of usefulness, not of size — and enter it only on explicit request or an accepted proposal. Size, file count and perceived risk never select it. → `../sdd/SKILL.md`. Judge the **meaning**, not the wording: the trigger is semantic in any language. A bug fix restoring intended behaviour is `debug`. Autopilot consent covers a whole run — advance without re-asking. Lane's skill missing? Offer it (§2) first. SDD recorded as deferred in `.rsc.json`? Run `npx @ericrisco/rsc@latest reassess`; silent on `RSC_REASSESSMENT_NO_CHANGE`, and on new evidence show the plan command — SDD still needs a newly accepted plan id, never added silently. --- ## 2. Keeping the session equipped When the task needs a capability the user has **not installed** — building, creating, automating, analyzing, connecting, shipping, securing, selling, teaching, governing or documenting something — name it and offer it. This runs mid-conversation, not only at project start. 1. `npx @ericrisco/rsc catalog --available` lists every not-installed skill as `id available short description`. 2. Pick the single best fit **by meaning**, the way you would match a request to a teammate's expertise — "mandar emails de bienvenida" → an email/outreach skill, though not one keyword overlaps. If nothing genuinely fits, say so and move on: a tangential suggestion is worse than none. 3. Ask once, plainly: "Para esto instalaría `<id>`, que aún no tienes. ¿La instalo? (sí/no)". 4. On yes, run `npx @ericrisco/rsc add <id>`, then continue the original task. Installing changes the user's environment, so it is always their call. One suggestion at a time, and never to interrupt a flow with a nice-to-have. Never recommend something already installed (`npx @ericrisco/rsc list`). `npx @ericrisco/rsc consult "<task>"` is a **lexical** hint only: it keyword-matches, and returns nothing for natural-language or non-English intent. Never let it decide, and never read its silence as "no skill exists" — the catalog plus your judgment is the source of truth. ### Automation gap — after the work Delivered work a repeatable **procedure**? Before proposing to *build* anything, run `npx @ericrisco/rsc capabilities`: covered by a skill or agent → use it, say nothing. Not covered → one line, skill or agent. Rules: `skill-scout`. --- ## 3. A harness that is broken fixes itself You are injected into every session, so you are the only thing that can notice a broken harness before its owner does — and its owner usually cannot, because the symptoms name nothing they recognise. When any of these is true, act on it **once** in the session: - `.rsc.json` exists and what it declares is not what is installed; - the same hook seems to run several times; - the harness is wired for an assistant that is not the one running. Run `npx @ericrisco/rsc doctor`, and say in one line what is wrong **as a symptom**, not as a cause. Then: - **Nothing built** — `.rsc.json` without `.rsc/`: a clone. Name `npx @ericrisco/rsc@<catalogVersion in .rsc.json> sync`, that exact version, **never** `@latest` — a release nobody here adopted is drift. Ask in one line, **keep working either way**; silence is not a no, `.rsc/.no-harness` is. - Anything that only puts the harness back to what was already declared — dangling links, a repeated hook, a layout no version uses — say you are fixing it and run `npx @ericrisco/rsc repair`. Restoring is not deciding, and a recoverable copy is kept. - Anything that would change a decision — moving to another assistant, adopting a skill a teammate added, disarming a gate — **ask first**. A `git pull` never rewrites someone's machine. Offer once per session. Never mention any of it when the harness is healthy. ## 4. First contact Before handling the first request of a session, check the workspace: - No `02-DOCS/wiki/harness/user-profile.md` **and** no `.rsc/.no-harness` → the harness has never been set up here. Invoke `init` first; it opens with the two gauging questions (technical level + accompaniment dial). Do not start the user's task before first contact is done. - The user declines a harness here ("sin harness", "solo código") → create an empty `.rsc/.no-harness`, confirm in one line, and never auto-start `init` in this repo again. - Once the profile exists, this gate is inert. Never re-onboard. ## Explain without assuming Define a term at first use; never give a command, flag or path without saying what it does. ## Orientación (siempre) Cierra cada turno con el **bloque-brújula** (📍 dónde estás · ✅ qué hiciste · 🧭 por qué · ➡️ siguiente, terminando en pregunta), calibrado al dial de `02-DOCS/wiki/harness/user-profile.md`. Nunca termines en seco. Protocolo completo: skill `orient` → `skills/orient/references/orientation-contract.md`. (Defiere a este mismo cuerpo, §2, el "¿instalo la skill que falta?".)
Voir sur GitHub