Skip to main content

implementation-planning

Break down specifications into executable implementation plans with TDD integration. Use when asked to "create plan", "break down tasks", "implementation roadmap", "規劃實作", "拆解任務", "執行計畫", or need step-by-step implementation guidance with test strategies and impact analysis. Use when asked to "plan from spec", "spec to plan", "generate plan from requirements".

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
forgivesam168/ai-dev-workflow
Dernière activité de la source
16 juillet 2026 à 00:27
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
2
Forks
1

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
implementation-planning
description
Break down specifications into executable implementation plans with TDD integration. Use when asked to "create plan", "break down tasks", "implementation roadmap", "規劃實作", "拆解任務", "執行計畫", or need step-by-step implementation guidance with test strategies and impact analysis. Use when asked to "plan from spec", "spec to plan", "generate plan from requirements".
license
See LICENSE.txt in repository root
# Implementation Planning > 💡 **Recommended Agent**: `plan-agent` (Strategic Planner) > - **CLI**: Input `/agent` and select `plan-agent` > - **VS Code**: Use `@workspace #plan-agent` in Chat > > **⚠️ CLI Note**: In CLI, use natural language like "規劃實作計畫". VS Code users can use `/create-plan` shortcut. ## When to Use This Skill Use this skill when: - Spec is complete and ready for implementation breakdown - Need to divide feature into manageable tasks - Want TDD-integrated task planning - Need impact analysis for brownfield changes - 規格文件完成,要開始拆解實作任務 - 需要評估變更對現有系統的影響 ## Prerequisites **Required**: - Selected Simple / Standard / High-Risk execution mode, confirmed requirements, and the declared plan/lifecycle SSOT - The mode-required Spec (`03-spec.md`) with clear requirements and acceptance criteria only when the selected mode or lifecycle stage requires it **Recommended**: - `01-brainstorm.md` for context and chosen approach - `02-decision-log.md` for architectural decisions ## Execution Mode Input Read the already selected execution mode from the task's lifecycle SSOT before planning. `WORKFLOW.md` owns all entry, artifact, and escalation semantics. | Mode | Planning input | |------|------|----------------| | **Simple** | Confirmed inline requirements or an existing project plan; a Change Package and Spec are not mandatory. | | **Standard** | The declared plan/lifecycle SSOT; use `03-spec.md` when the selected stages or contract require it. | | **High-Risk** | Complete Change Package with approved requirements, decisions, AC, rollback/migration, verification, and operational evidence. | **Missing artifacts behavior**: If a mode-required artifact is absent, stop and identify the exact missing prerequisite. Do not infer a required Spec from conversation alone. ## Spec Cross-Validation Before Step 1, test each acceptance criterion (AC) in the spec: > *"Can I write a concrete, testable implementation step for this AC?"* - If **YES** → proceed - If **NO** → 1 spec gap: record in `## Spec Gaps` section and continue. 2 gaps: surface all gaps to user and wait for clarification or explicit "proceed". ≥3 unresolved gaps: stop (`BLOCKED`). This prevents ambiguous ACs from producing unverifiable plan tasks. ## Step-by-Step Workflow ### Step 1: Requirements Review Review the spec and confirm: 1. **Goals** are clear 2. **User stories** have acceptance criteria 3. **Technical requirements** are defined 4. **Dependencies** are identified ### Step 2: Task Breakdown Break down implementation into phases: #### Phase Structure Each phase should: - Be independently testable - Take 2-4 hours max (break larger tasks) - Include clear entry/exit criteria - Specify test strategy #### Example Breakdown ``` Phase 1: Data Model & Database Phase 2: Core Business Logic Phase 3: API Layer Phase 4: Frontend Integration Phase 5: E2E Testing & Polish ``` ### Step 3: TDD Integration For each task, specify: 1. **Test First**: What tests to write 2. **Implementation**: Minimal code to pass 3. **Refactor**: Cleanup and optimization 4. **Verification**: How to confirm completion ### Step 4: Impact Analysis (Brownfield) If modifying existing system: 1. **Affected Components**: Which files/modules change 2. **Breaking Changes**: API/schema changes 3. **Migration Requirements**: Data migration needs 4. **Rollback Strategy**: How to revert if needed ### Step 5: Generate Plan Document Create `changes/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/04-plan.md`: --- **Template**: ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Feature Name} ## Overview {Brief summary of what will be implemented} **Spec Reference**: `03-spec.md` ## Implementation Strategy ### Approach {High-level approach: e.g., "Bottom-up: DB → Logic → API → UI"} ### First TDD Slice > 🎯 **Start here**: Task {Phase.Task} — {one-line description} > Minimum testable increment. Code Agent begins implementation from this task. ### Phases {Number of phases: e.g., "5 phases, estimated 16-20 hours total"} --- ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} **Status**: ⏳ Pending | 🔄 In Progress | ✅ Done | 🚫 Blocked **Depends on**: None | Phase {N} ### Objective {What this phase accomplishes} ### Tasks #### Task 1.1: {Task Name} **Status**: ⏳ Pending | 🔄 In Progress | ✅ Done | 🚫 Blocked **Depends on**: None | Task {X.Y} **Test Tier**: L1 (fully mocked) | 🔌 L2 (requires `{CREDENTIAL_NAME}`) | 🔌 L3 (full environment) **Test Strategy** (RED): - Write test: `{test file path}` - Test case: {What the test validates} - Expected failure: {Why it should fail initially} **Implementation** (GREEN): - File: `{implementation file path}` - Changes: {Brief description} - Minimal code to pass test **Refactor** (REFACTOR): - Extract common logic - Improve naming - Remove duplication **Acceptance Criteria**: - [ ] {Criterion 1} - [ ] {Criterion 2} - [ ] Test coverage ≥80% **Estimated Time**: {X hours} --- #### Task 1.2: {Task Name} {Repeat structure} --- ### Phase 1 Exit Criteria - [ ] All Phase 1 tests passing - [ ] Code reviewed and refactored - [ ] Coverage ≥80% - [ ] No blocking issues --- ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} {Repeat phase structure} --- ## Dependencies ### External - {Dependency 1: e.g., "Redis for job queue"} - {Dependency 2: e.g., "SendGrid API key for email"} ### Internal - {Dependency 1: e.g., "User authentication must be complete"} - {Dependency 2: e.g., "Database migration #123 deployed"} ### Sequencing - Phase 1 must complete before Phase 2 - Phase 3 and Phase 4 can run in parallel --- ## Impact Analysis (Brownfield Changes) ### Affected Components | Component | Type | Impact Level | Action Required | |-----------|------|--------------|-----------------| | `lib/users.ts` | Modified | Medium | Update user model | | `api/v1/users` | Modified | High | Breaking change (version bump) | | `components/UserProfile` | Modified | Low | Update props | | `tests/users.test.ts` | Modified | Medium | Add new test cases | ### Breaking Changes - ⚠️ API: `/api/v1/users` response schema adds `notificationPreferences` field - **Impact**: External clients may break if they validate strict schemas - **Migration**: Announce 2 weeks before, provide migration guide - **Rollback**: Deploy v1 and v2 endpoints in parallel during transition ### Data Migration **Required**: Yes - **Script**: `migrations/2024-01-30-add-notification-prefs.sql` - **Rollback**: `migrations/2024-01-30-add-notification-prefs-down.sql` - **Test**: Run on staging first - **Estimated time**: 30 seconds (10k rows) ### Rollback Strategy 1. Database: Run down migration 2. Code: Deploy previous git commit 3. Feature flag: Disable `notifications_enabled` flag 4. Verify: Check health endpoints and logs --- ## Risks & Mitigations | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |------|-----------|--------|------------| | Email deliverability issues | Medium | High | Configure SPF/DKIM, use reputable service | | Performance degradation | Low | High | Load test with 10x expected traffic | | Notification spam | Medium | Medium | Rate limiting, user preferences | --- ## Testing Strategy ### L1 — Unit Tests (fully mocked) - All business logic functions - Target: 80%+ coverage - No real infrastructure required — runs anywhere, CI/CD included ### L2 — Integration Tests (real infrastructure) - Tasks annotated 🔌 L2 in the task list above - Requires real credentials (DB connection strings, API keys, etc.) - Flag as `PENDING_REAL_CREDS` when credentials unavailable; see tdd-workflow Infrastructure-Gated Test Protocol ### L3 — E2E Tests (full environment) - Critical user flows only - Run on staging environment - Human must confirm environment ready before Phase is considered DONE - Tools: Playwright ### Performance Tests (if needed) - Load: {X requests/second} - Duration: {Y minutes} - Tool: k6/Artillery --- ## Estimated Timeline | Phase | Tasks | Estimated Time | Dependencies | |-------|-------|---------------|--------------| | Phase 1 | 3 tasks | 4-6 hours | None | | Phase 2 | 4 tasks | 5-7 hours | Phase 1 complete | | Phase 3 | 2 tasks | 3-4 hours | Phase 2 complete | | Phase 4 | 3 tasks | 4-5 hours | Phase 3 complete | | **Total** | **12 tasks** | **16-22 hours** | Sequential | --- ## Approval & Next Steps **Plan Status**: ⏳ Awaiting Approval **Approval Checklist**: - [ ] All phases reviewed - [ ] Risks acceptable - [ ] Timeline reasonable - [ ] Dependencies available - [ ] Impact analysis complete (if brownfield) **Next Step After Approval**: → Start Phase 1 with TDD: "開始 TDD 實作" → Or use workflow orchestrator: "what's next?" ``` --- ## Vertical Slice Strategy A **vertical slice** is the smallest testable increment that traverses all application layers — from the entry point (API / UI / CLI) to the data layer — and delivers a **fully verifiable feature unit**. | Dimension | Vertical Slice ✅ | Horizontal Slice ❌ | |-----------|-----------------|---------------------| | Definition | One feature path end-to-end | All tests in Task 1, all impl in Task 2 | | Commit size | ≤ 1 focused commit | Multiple commits before anything verifiable | | Validation point | Each task produces a runnable, testable increment | Only verifiable after all tasks complete | ### Slice Size Standard - Each task = **one vertical slice** = at most 1 focused commit - Split a task when it touches ≥ 3 independent feature paths - **Pure backend / DB migration**: UI layer is optional, but the task must still cover a **complete, independently verifiable functional unit** (e.g., "migration runs + data is correct + query returns expected rows") ### Plan-Agent Enforcement Rule Before accepting any Task, apply this check: > *"Does this Task contain BOTH a test strategy AND an implementation step for the same feature path?"* - **YES** → vertical slice confirmed; proceed - **NO** → flag as Spec Gap; do NOT accept a Task that contains only tests or only implementation --- ## Anti-Pattern: Horizontal Slicing ``` ❌ HORIZONTAL SLICING (Forbidden): Task 1: Write all unit tests for the feature Task 2: Implement all production code Task 3: Refactor everything ✅ VERTICAL SLICING (Required): Task 1: User can create a basic transaction (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR) Task 2: Transaction validates amount precision (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR) Task 3: Transaction idempotency key enforced (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR) ``` **Why horizontal slicing is harmful**: 1. Tests written without implementation drift from actual behavior 2. No verifiable increment until all tasks complete — entire phase becomes a single blast radius 3. Violates Red-Green-Refactor: there is no RED phase without a specific implementation target **plan-agent enforcement rule**: Any Task whose Test Strategy contains **only tests** or whose Implementation contains **only code with no corresponding test strategy** must be flagged as a Spec Gap and rewritten as a vertical slice before the plan is approved. --- ## Plan Handoff Gate Run `/agentic-eval` before TDD handoff only when the selected Standard mode is risk-triggered or the High-Risk **Pre-Implementation Readiness** gate requests supporting self-evaluation. It cannot replace independent review or override deterministic failure: | Check | Threshold | |-------|-----------| | Spec Coverage | Every AC in `03-spec.md` has ≥1 Task — **HARD STOP** if any AC unaddressed | | Task Executability | Each task has `Depends on`, `Test Tier`, Test Strategy, AC — flag if missing | | First TDD Slice | Explicitly marked in Implementation Strategy — **HARD STOP** if missing | | Infrastructure Gaps | All 🔌 L2/L3 tasks flagged with required credential names | | Risk Coverage | All High-risk items from brainstorm have mitigation in Risks table | **Gate PASS → Human approves → Code Agent starts TDD** **Gate FAIL → Fix the failing dimension and re-run** --- ## Quality Criteria **Must Have**: - ✅ Each task has TDD strategy (Red-Green-Refactor) - ✅ Acceptance criteria are testable - ✅ Dependencies identified - ✅ Estimated timeline provided - ✅ Impact analysis (if brownfield) **Financial Systems Must Have**: - ✅ Money handling tasks specify precision (no floats) - ✅ Transaction tasks include idempotency plan - ✅ Audit logging tasks defined **Nice to Have**: - Sequence diagrams for complex flows - Risk matrix visualization - Automated dependency checks ## Next Step After plan approval: **CLI**: ``` Input: "開始 TDD 實作" [System loads tdd-workflow skill] → /agent → Select coder-agent → Follow Red-Green-Refactor cycle ``` **VS Code**: ``` Input: /tdd Or: "start TDD implementation" ``` Or use workflow orchestrator: ``` Input: "what's next?" [System detects plan complete, recommends TDD stage] ``` ## When You Have a Spec Ready (Simplified Mode) If `03-spec.md` is already complete, you can skip straight to task breakdown:
Voir sur GitHub
Ce SKILL.md est tres volumineux, SkillsMP affiche donc ici seulement la premiere section. Voir sur GitHub