Skip to main content

optimize-plugin

This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate a plugin", "optimize plugin", "check plugin quality", "review plugin structure", or "run plugin optimizer".

Informations de source

Dépôt
FradSer/dotclaude
Dernière activité de la source
8 juillet 2026 à 04:38
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
594
Forks
50

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
optimize-plugin
description
This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate a plugin", "optimize plugin", "check plugin quality", "review plugin structure", or "run plugin optimizer".
argument-hint
<plugin-path>
user-invocable
true
allowed-tools
["Read","Glob","Bash(realpath:*)","Bash(python3:*)","AskUserQuestion","TaskCreate","TaskUpdate","Skill","Task"]
# Plugin Optimization Execute plugin validation and optimization workflow. **Target:** $ARGUMENTS ## Background Knowledge Load `plugin-optimizer:plugin-best-practices` skill using the Skill tool for component templates, tool invocation rules, and type classification. ## Phase 1: Discovery & Validation **Goal**: Validate structure and detect issues. Orchestrator MUST NOT apply fixes. **Actions**: 1. Resolve path with `realpath` and verify existence 2. Validate `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` exists 3. Find component directories: `commands/`, `agents/`, `skills/`, `hooks/` 4. Validate components against `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/examples/` templates 5. Assess architecture: if `commands/` exists with `.md` files, use `AskUserQuestion` tool to ask about migrating to skills structure 6. Run validation: `python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate-plugin.py "$TARGET"` - Options: `--check=structure,manifest,frontmatter,tools,tokens` - JSON output: `--json` - Verbose: `-v, --verbose` 7. Compile issues by severity (Critical, Warning, Info) ## Phase 2: Agent-Based Optimization **Goal**: Launch agent to apply ALL fixes. Orchestrator does NOT make fixes directly. **Condition**: Always execute. **Actions**: 1. Launch `plugin-optimizer:plugin-optimizer` agent with the following prompt content: - Target plugin path (absolute path from Phase 1) - Validation console output (issues list from Phase 1) - Template validation results - User decisions (migration choice if applicable) - INSTRUCTION: Analyze the validation output to identify issues 2. Agent autonomously applies fixes (MUST use `AskUserQuestion` tool before applying template fixes, presenting violations with specific examples and before/after comparison) 3. Agent increments version in `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` after fixes: - Patch (x.y.Z+1): Bug fixes - Minor (x.Y+1.0): New components - Major (X+1.0.0): Breaking changes 4. Wait for agent to complete **Path Reference Rules**: - Same directory: Use relative paths (`./reference.md`) - Outside directory: Use `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` paths - Component templates: See `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/examples/` **Redundancy & Efficiency**: - Redundancy: Allow strategic repetition of critical content (MUST/SHOULD requirements). Favor concise restatement. - Efficiency: Agent detects if tasks need Agent Teams (Parallelizable > 5 files, Multi-domain). ## Phase 3: Verification & Deliverables **Goal**: Verify fixes, generate report, and update documentation. **Actions**: 1. Execute validation script: `python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/validate-plugin.py "$TARGET"` 2. Analyze results: compare with Phase 1 findings, confirm critical issues resolved 3. If critical issues remain, resume agent execution 4. Generate final validation report using template below 5. Update `README.md` to reflect current state (metadata, directory structure, usage instructions; do not append version history log) ## Validation Report Template ```markdown ## Plugin Validation Report ### Plugin: [name] Location: [absolute-path] Version: [old] -> [new] ### Summary [2-3 sentences with key statistics] ### Phase 1: Issues Detected #### Critical ([count]) - `file/path` - [Issue description] #### Warnings ([count]) - `file/path` - [Issue description] ### Phase 2: Fixes Applied #### Structure Fixes - [Fix description] #### Template Conformance - **Agents**: [Count] validated, [count] fixed - **Instruction-type Skills**: [Count] validated, [count] fixed - **Knowledge-type Skills**: [Count] validated, [count] fixed #### Redundancy Fixes - [Consolidations applied] ### Phase 3: Verification Results - Structure validation: [PASS/FAIL] - Manifest validation: [PASS/FAIL] - Component validation: [PASS/FAIL] - Tool patterns validation: [PASS/FAIL] - Token budgets validation: [PASS/FAIL] ### Token Budget Analysis - Skills analyzed: [count] - Tier 1 (Metadata ~100): [OK count], [WARNING count] - Tier 2 (SKILL.md under 5k): [OK count], [WARNING count], [CRITICAL count] - Tier 3 (References, effectively unlimited): [total tokens] ### Component Inventory - Commands: [count] found, [count] valid - Agents: [count] found, [count] valid - Skills: [count] found, [count] valid ### Remaining Issues [Issues that couldn't be auto-fixed with explanations] ### Overall Assessment [PASS/FAIL] - [Detailed reasoning] ```
Voir sur GitHub