review-repo

name	review-repo
description	Adversarial review of an entire repository, run inline in a single process: propose → kill → judge, one lens per run. Writes a report plus findings.json under .gbencke/adversarial-review/reports/. Spawns no subagents. Trigger: /review-repo <path> [--lenses a,b,c], "adversarial review of this repo".
argument-hint	<path> [--lenses a,b,c]

review-repo — adversarial whole-repository review

Run the adversarial loop yourself, in this process (see BASE_DIR/CONTEXT.md for the glossary). You are the reviewer, the challenger, and the judge, in that order — three roles, one process, strict phase separation.

No subagents. Never use the Agent tool in this skill. Parallelism is the caller's job: batch runners launch one process per (repo × lens) — see ADR 0004. Spawning agents here would multiply concurrency by the number of lenses and chunks.

Shared assets base dir (BASE_DIR below) — ~/.claude/skills/adversarial-review/: CONTEXT.md (glossary), agents/ (reviewer, challenger, judge role packs), lenses/ (15 lenses), bin/run-matrix.sh (the matrix launcher).

Phase 0 — Target and scope

1. The repo path is required. Take it from the argument. If the argument is empty (or contains only flags like --lenses …), stop immediately with:

   review-repo needs a repository path: /review-repo <path> [--lenses a,b,c]

   Never fall back to the current working directory — batch runners invoke this from an unrelated cwd, and reviewing the wrong repo silently is worse than failing.

2. Resolve the path to absolute (TARGET_DIR). Confirm it exists and is a repo (has .git or source files). If not, stop and say which check failed.

3. Read BASE_DIR/agents/reviewer.md, BASE_DIR/agents/challenger.md, and BASE_DIR/agents/judge.md. These are role packs: the stance, contract, and output schema you adopt for each phase below. Fill their slots mentally; you are the audience now, not a subagent.

Phase 1 — Lens selection (never ask)

1. List BASE_DIR/lenses/. For each lens read lens.md (name, apply-when signals).
2. Also check <TARGET_DIR>/.gbencke/adversarial-review/lenses/ (project overlay). New names are added; same-named lenses MERGE (project rules.md appended after the global rules.md).
3. A lens applies when its signals match the repo (globs, dependency names, file types). test-surface and blast-radius are change-only — skip them for repo reviews.
4. Run every matched lens. Never prompt. There is no lens picker: the matched set is the selection. State the selected lens names in chat and go straight to Phase 2. A prompt would deadlock non-interactive callers (claude -p), which is how batch runs drive this skill.
5. --lenses arg: if the argument contains --lenses a,b,c, use exactly those lenses instead of the matched set. That is the only way to narrow the selection. One lens per run is the batch case and the cheapest per-process context.
6. Per-chunk matching: language lenses (signals are file globs like *.go, *.ts) review ONLY the chunks whose files match — a Go-only chunk does not get the typescript lens. always lenses review every chunk.
7. Compute LENS_SLUG for the report basename: the lens name when exactly one lens is selected, otherwise multi. This is what keeps concurrent runs from overwriting each other (Phase 4).

Phase 2 — Chunking (exhaustive)

1. Walk the repo. ALWAYS skip: .git, node_modules, vendor, dist, build, target, lock files, generated code, minified assets, binary files, the .gbencke/adversarial-review dir itself.
2. Chunk along top-level module/directory boundaries. Split a directory that is too large for one reading pass (~>40 source files or ~>30k tokens) mechanically into sub-chunks.
3. Produce the chunk list [{id, paths[]}] and state the count.

Phase 3 — The loop, one chunk at a time

Process chunks sequentially. For each chunk, for each lens that matches it:

1. Propose — adopt BASE_DIR/agents/reviewer.md for that lens: read the chunk's files under the lens's merged rules.md and produce findings as the JSON in that role pack. Every finding needs file:line, a failure condition, and evidence. Run the role pack's adversarial self-check and drop what dies.
2. Kill — switch to BASE_DIR/agents/challenger.md for the same findings: try to disprove each one against the actual code (callers, middleware, framework defaults, parent config). Emit VALID / INVALID / AMBIGUOUS with the kill attempts you actually made. Do not raise new findings while wearing this hat; note them and propose them in the next chunk that owns the code.
3. Discard the file contents. Keep ONLY the challenger JSON for this chunk. Your own context is the budget now that there are no subagents to absorb it — carrying source across chunks is what makes a large repo run out of room. If context is still tight, append each chunk's challenger JSON to a scratch file in the system temp dir and re-read it in Phase 4.

Never batch all chunks into one reading pass: one chunk in context at a time is what keeps findings specific instead of vague.

If a chunk cannot be read or blows the budget, record it as skipped with the reason and carry on. Partial coverage beats aborting — the report says what was skipped.

Phase 4 — Judge

Now adopt BASE_DIR/agents/judge.md with:

• {{MODE}}: repo
• {{FINDINGS}}: every chunk's challenger JSON from Phase 3
• {{CONTEXT}}: repo name, selected lenses, chunk count, skipped chunks

Rule on challenger output only — do not re-read code to invent new findings. Drop INVALID, dedup across chunks and lenses, audit severity, then write BOTH artifacts into <TARGET_DIR>/.gbencke/adversarial-review/reports/:

• <yyyymmdd-hhmmss>-repo-<LENS_SLUG>.md — the report
• <yyyymmdd-hhmmss>-repo-<LENS_SLUG>.findings.json — the sidecar (same basename)

The lens slug is required, not cosmetic: reviews of one repo run concurrently (one process per repo × lens), so a lens-less basename collides whenever two runs finish in the same second.

Concurrency safety

Other reviews of this same repo are probably running right now in other processes, under other lenses. Therefore:

• mkdir -p the reports dir; never clear, prune, or rotate it.
• Write only the two files named above. Never delete or overwrite a report you did not just create.
• Never lock the repo, never write scratch files inside TARGET_DIR (use the system temp dir), never run a mutating git command (add, stash, checkout, clean).
• Never infer "the latest report" from the directory listing — the newest file there probably belongs to another lens's run.

Phase 5 — Summary

Reply in chat with ONLY: per-lens health verdicts, severity counts (P0/P1/P2/P3), top-5 findings (one line each), skipped chunks (if any), and the report path. Nothing else — the report is the deliverable.

Last line, on its own, absolute, prefixed exactly REPORT: — batch callers parse that line instead of guessing from directory mtimes.

Hard rules

• Never use the Agent tool. One process, three roles, phases in order.
• Keep the phases honest: propose, then kill, then judge. Never let the judge role rescue a finding the challenger killed, and never skip the kill phase because a finding "looks obvious" — proposal and refutation stay separate even inside one process (ADR 0001, ADR 0004).
• Never modify the reviewed repo except writing into .gbencke/adversarial-review/reports/.
• Never execute repo code, test suites, builds, or cloud/API calls (see docs/adr/0002-execution-boundary.md).