Skip to main content

engram-testing-coverage

TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.

Informations de source

Dépôt
Gentleman-Programming/engram
Dernière activité de la source
25 septembre 2026 à 17:40
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
7 608
Forks
798

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
engram-testing-coverage
description
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0"}
## When to Use Use this skill when: - Adding new behavior - Fixing a bug - Refactoring logic with branch complexity --- ## TDD Loop 1. Write a failing test for the target behavior. 2. Implement the smallest code to pass. 3. Refactor while keeping tests green. 4. Add edge/error-path tests before closing. --- ## Coverage Rules - Cover happy path + error paths + edge cases. - Prefer deterministic tests over flaky integration paths. - Add seams only when branches are impossible to trigger naturally. - Keep runtime behavior unchanged when adding seams. --- ## Verification Ownership Verification is evidence about the candidate; CI is the automated execution venue, not a substitute for local focused evidence. - For behavior changes, run a focused regression test and tests for the affected package(s) locally before proposing the change. Report the commands and outcomes. - Use targeted coverage when useful to find missed behavior or branches. Do not require a numeric coverage target or total module coverage for every PR. - After the candidate is pushed to a PR, GitHub CI owns the full unit suite (`go test ./...`), E2E suite (`go test -tags e2e ./internal/server/...`), lint, and applicable platform checks. Do not report CI evidence until those checks actually run. - When there is no PR or the candidate is unpushed, or when risk justifies more verification, run the additional applicable checks locally. Report checks that could not run as missing evidence rather than claiming CI covered them. Avoid duplicating the broad suite locally by default when PR CI will run it.
Voir sur GitHub