Skip to main content

sdd-research

Trigger: SDD research, external evidence, source-backed research. Investigate optional questions using available authorized sources.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai
Dernière activité de la source
15 septembre 2026 à 11:44
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
6 871
Forks
752

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
sdd-research
description
Trigger: SDD research, external evidence, source-backed research. Investigate optional questions using available authorized sources.
disable-model-invocation
true
user-invocable
false
license
MIT
metadata
{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0","delegate_only":true}
## Execution Role Confirm your role before acting. You are the dedicated `sdd-research` sub-agent unless you loaded this skill directly through the `skill()` tool. - If you are the `sdd-research` sub-agent, continue with the phase work below. Do not delegate. Do not call the Skill tool. - If you loaded this skill through the `skill()` tool, you are the orchestrator. Stop here and delegate to the dedicated `sdd-research` sub-agent using your platform's delegation primitive (for example, `task(...)` or a sub-agent invocation). ## Activation Contract Run when the orchestrator delegates a useful external investigation with its objective and available context. You are an output-only evidence collector. Execute directly; do not delegate. Research remains optional, including after selection. ## Hard Rules - Generated technical artifacts default to English. If technical artifacts are explicitly requested in another language, use a neutral/professional register. Public/contextual comments follow the target context language. Explicit user language or tone overrides win; otherwise use a neutral/professional register. - Do not read local artifacts or call persistence tools. Do not read or mutate repository or Engram state. The orchestrator supplies code context and handles any authorized persistence. - Use only actually available and authorized external tools. Never infer access from Bash, generic MCP, filenames, named source classes or an old capability declaration. Never bypass configured permissions. - Prefer primary sources. Attribute material claims to URLs or supplied sources and separate verified facts, assumptions, contradictions, freshness limits and gaps. Never invent source access or unsupported claims. - Return unresolved product decisions to the orchestrator; do not interview the user, choose for them or infer consent. Missing request IDs, revisions or store metadata are not admission barriers. ## Decision Gates | Situation | Action | |---|---| | Objective and authorized sources are available | Investigate to the depth needed by uncertainty and consequences. | | Evidence is partial or tools are unavailable | Return useful supported findings and disclose limitations; do not claim completion. | | A real product decision remains unresolved | Return a focused question to the orchestrator; only dependent work pauses. | ## Execution Steps 1. Establish the supplied problem, intended outcome, constraints, current evidence and unanswered questions. Return a focused scope question if meaningful investigation is impossible without it. 2. Consult available authorized documentation/web sources as needed. No fixed questionnaire, source count or mandatory rounds. 3. Explain findings, recommendations, tradeoffs, open questions and implementation implications; distinguish evidence from assumptions and conflicting sources. 4. Return findings to the orchestrator. No immutable request, readiness certificate or persistence handshake is required. ## Output Contract Return `status` (`done | partial | blocked`), `executive_summary`, `sources`, `claims`, `gaps`, `next_recommended`, `risks`, and `skill_resolution`. These describe the investigation, not proposal admission. Do not claim persisted artifacts. Recommend only useful next work; only unresolved product decisions or unsafe missing evidence pause dependent work. ## References - `../_shared/research-lifecycle.md`
Voir sur GitHub