| name | google-ads-expert |
| description | Build profitable Google Ads campaigns by applying Perry Marshall's 80/20 principles to paid search optimization Use when: **Setting up a new Google Ads account** from scratch; **Optimizing existing campaigns** that are underperforming; **Structuring campaigns** for maximum quality score and ROI; **Applying 80/20 thinking** to identify high-leverage optimizations; **Scaling profitable campaigns** without wasting budget |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"author":"ClawFu","version":"1.0.0","mcp-server":"@clawfu/mcp-skills"} |
Google Ads Expert - Master Paid Search with 80/20 Thinking
Build profitable Google Ads campaigns by applying Perry Marshall's 80/20 principles to paid search optimization
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up a new Google Ads account from scratch
- Optimizing existing campaigns that are underperforming
- Structuring campaigns for maximum quality score and ROI
- Applying 80/20 thinking to identify high-leverage optimizations
- Scaling profitable campaigns without wasting budget
- Qualifying leads before they click (saving money on bad clicks)
- Prioritizing optimization efforts for maximum impact
Methodology Foundation
| Aspect | Details |
|---|
| Source | Ultimate Guide to Google Ads, 80/20 Sales and Marketing |
| Expert | Perry Marshall - Pioneer of Google Ads education, 80/20 marketing guru |
| Core Principle | "Most people think traffic is 80% of the battle, but it's really 20%. CONVERSION is 80% of the battle. Once conversion is solid, traffic mysteries solve themselves." |
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|
| Structures content frameworks | Final messaging |
| Suggests persuasion techniques | Brand voice |
| Creates draft variations | Version selection |
| Identifies optimization opportunities | Publication timing |
| Analyzes competitor approaches | Strategic direction |
What This Skill Does
This skill combines Google Ads technical mastery with strategic 80/20 thinking to help you build campaigns that are profitable from the start.
You'll learn to:
- Apply 80/20 to campaigns - Find the 20% of effort that drives 80% of results
- Structure for Quality Score - Organize campaigns for maximum relevance
- Rack the shotgun - Qualify visitors before they cost you money
- Optimize the right things - Peel back the optimization onion correctly
- Scale profitably - Know when and how to increase spend
- Think in conversions - Put conversion ahead of traffic
The result: Campaigns that make money consistently, not just get clicks.
How to Use
Prompt Examples
Help me structure a Google Ads campaign for [business/product] using Perry Marshall's
match type segmentation approach. I want to maximize Quality Score and control.
Apply 80/20 analysis to my Google Ads account. Here are my top 20 keywords by spend:
[list]. Where should I focus my optimization efforts for maximum impact?
Create a lead qualification strategy for my Google Ads campaigns. I sell [product]
and waste money on [type of bad clicks]. How do I "rack the shotgun"?
My campaigns are profitable at $X/day but I want to scale. Use the 80/20 approach
to help me identify how to increase spend without killing ROI.
Prioritize my optimization checklist for [campaign type]. What's the 80/20 order
of operations I should follow before spending more money?
Instructions
The 80/20 Framework for Google Ads
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 80/20 IN GOOGLE ADS │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ 80% of conversions come from 20% of keywords │
│ 80% of costs come from 20% of keywords │
│ 80% of wasted spend comes from 20% of search terms │
│ │
│ BUT ALSO: │
│ │
│ 4% of keywords drive 64% of conversions (80/20 of 80/20) │
│ 1% of keywords drive ~50% of conversions │
│ │
│ "Find the vital few, ignore the trivial many" │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Strategic Implication: Don't optimize everything equally. Find your top performers and make them even better. Find your worst performers and eliminate them.
Step 1: The Conversion-First Mindset
Before worrying about traffic, get conversion right.
"Most people think traffic is 80% of the battle, but it's really 20%. CONVERSION is 80% of the battle."
The Order of Operations:
| Priority | Focus | Why |
|---|
| 1 | Landing page conversion | Without this, all traffic is wasted |
| 2 | Offer/value proposition | Must be compelling enough to convert |
| 3 | Ad relevance to landing page | Quality Score and conversion both improve |
| 4 | Keyword selection | Target the right searchers |
| 5 | Traffic scaling | Only AFTER 1-4 are solid |
Conversion Benchmarks:
- If conversion rate is <1%, fix the landing page first
- If conversion rate is 2-5%, you can optimize ads
- If conversion rate is >5%, you can start scaling traffic
Step 2: Campaign Structure for Quality Score
Match Type Segmentation:
Separate your keywords by match type into different ad groups or campaigns:
Campaign: [Product Name]
├── Ad Group: Exact Match Keywords
│ └── [keyword] → dedicated ads
├── Ad Group: Phrase Match Keywords
│ └── "keyword" → dedicated ads
├── Ad Group: Modified Broad Match
│ └── +keyword → dedicated ads
└── Ad Group: Broad Match (for discovery)
└── keyword → catch-all ads
Why This Works:
- Exact match keywords get highest relevance scores
- You can bid aggressively on exact (known performers)
- Broad match becomes a "fishing expedition" for new terms
- Each match type gets appropriate bid strategy
The Peel and Stick Technique:
- Run broad match to discover what people actually search
- Check Search Terms Report for high-performers
- "Peel" those terms out of broad match
- "Stick" them into their own exact match ad groups
- Create dedicated ads for each peeled term
- Add negative of exact match to broad campaign
Result: Continuous refinement, higher Quality Scores, lower costs.
Step 3: Rack the Shotgun (Qualify Before the Click)
"The art of sorting out your customers, weeding out the qualified from the non-qualified, is one of the most important skills you can develop."
80/20 Reality: 80% of people who click will never buy. You're paying for all of them.
Pre-Qualification Tactics:
| Tactic | How It Works | Example |
|---|
| Price in ad | Scares away non-buyers | "$499/month starting price" |
| Specificity | Attracts only right audience | "Enterprise-only" or "For teams of 50+" |
| Qualification language | Self-selection | "If you're serious about..." |
| Negative keywords | Block bad searchers | -free, -cheap, -DIY, -jobs |
| Callout extensions | Set expectations | "Minimum $10K project" |
Five Power Disqualifiers:
Before someone becomes a lead, they should pass:
- Money - Do they have budget for your solution?
- Authority - Can they make the purchase decision?
- Need - Do they have the problem you solve?
- Timing - Are they ready to act now?
- Fit - Are they the right customer for you?
Landing Page Qualification:
- Add a short quiz: "Is [Product] right for you?"
- Include pricing or "starting at" to filter budget
- Use specific case studies that speak to ideal customers
- Make non-buyers self-select out
Step 4: The Optimization Onion
Peel back optimization layers in the right order:
OPTIMIZATION PRIORITY
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ OUTER LAYER (Do First) │
│ ├── Match type segmentation │
│ ├── Ad extensions (all of them) │
│ └── Negative keywords │
│ │
│ MIDDLE LAYER (Do Second) │
│ ├── Ad copy split testing │
│ ├── Landing page optimization │
│ └── Bid adjustments by device │
│ │
│ INNER LAYER (Do Third) │
│ ├── Audience targeting │
│ ├── Day/time bidding │
│ └── Geographic bid adjustments │
│ │
│ CORE (Only After Everything Else) │
│ └── Increase budget/bids │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
Perry's Rule:
"Your first response should NOT be 'I'm going to spend more money.' Your first response should be 'Am I optimizing everything I can really optimize?'"
Step 5: 80/20 Budget Allocation
Where to Put Your Money:
| Performance Level | Budget Allocation | Strategy |
|---|
| Top 20% of keywords | 64% of budget | Scale aggressively |
| Middle 60% | 30% of budget | Test and optimize |
| Bottom 20% | 6% of budget | Cut or pause |
Identifying Your 80/20:
- Export last 90 days of keyword data
- Sort by conversions (not clicks!)
- Calculate cumulative % of total conversions
- Mark where you hit 80% of conversions
- Count how many keywords got you there (usually ~20%)
- These are your "vital few"
The 80/20 of 80/20:
- Within your top 20%, another 80/20 exists
- 4% of keywords often drive 50%+ of conversions
- These deserve individual campaigns, dedicated landing pages
Step 6: Scaling Profitably
When to Scale:
Only after:
How to Scale:
| Method | When to Use | Risk Level |
|---|
| Increase bids on winners | Top 20% keywords | Low |
| Add similar keywords | Proven ad groups | Medium |
| Expand match types | Exact → Phrase | Medium |
| New campaigns/audiences | After core is solid | Higher |
| Increase daily budget | All above done | Low |
Warning Signs to Stop Scaling:
- CPA increases by >20%
- Conversion rate drops significantly
- Quality Score declining
- Impression share not improving with budget
Step 7: Advanced 80/20 Strategies
Tiered Offering Strategy:
"20% of people are willing to spend 4x the money for a better experience."
If your main offer is $100, consider:
- Standard: $100 (for 80%)
- Premium: $400 (for 16%)
- Elite: $1,600 (for 4%)
Run separate campaigns for each tier - the economics are different.
Predictive Budgeting:
Using 80/20 math to predict market size:
- If 1,000 people buy at $50
- ~200 will pay $200 (4x)
- ~40 will pay $800 (16x)
- ~8 will pay $3,200 (64x)
Plan campaigns and landing pages for each segment.
Examples
Example 1: E-commerce Store Optimization
Situation: Online store selling specialty kitchen equipment. Spending $5,000/month on Google Ads with 2.5% conversion rate. Wants to improve ROI.
80/20 Analysis:
Exported 90 days of data, found:
- 147 active keywords
- 23 keywords (16%) drove 81% of sales
- 6 keywords (4%) drove 52% of sales
- 87 keywords (59%) had zero conversions
Action Plan:
1. Immediate (Outer Layer):
- Pause 87 zero-conversion keywords → Save ~$800/month
- Add negative keywords from Search Terms Report
- Enable all ad extensions (was missing callouts, structured snippets)
2. Structure (Match Types):
- Create exact match campaign for top 23 keywords
- Create separate ad groups for top 6 keywords
- Move existing to phrase/broad for discovery
3. Qualify Better:
- Add price to ads: "From $89 - Premium Kitchen Tools"
- Landing page: Added "Who this is for" section
- Negative keywords: -cheap, -wholesale, -bulk, -used
4. Scale Winners:
- Top 6 keywords: Increased bids 30%
- Created dedicated landing pages for top 3 products
- Built remarketing lists from converters
Results after 60 days:
- Spend: $4,200/month (down 16%)
- Conversions: Up 34%
- ROAS: Improved from 3.2x to 5.1x
Example 2: B2B SaaS Lead Generation
Situation: SaaS company generating leads via Google Ads. Getting lots of clicks but low quality leads. Sales team complaining about tire-kickers.
Problem Diagnosis:
Using 80/20 thinking:
- 80% of leads were unqualified (too small, no budget, wrong use case)
- 80% of wasted ad spend came from broad match fishing
Rack the Shotgun Implementation:
1. Ad Copy Qualification:
Before: "Project Management Software - Free Trial"
After: "Project Management for Teams 50+ | Starting $499/mo"
2. Landing Page Qualification:
Added "Is [Product] Right For You?" quiz:
- Team size?
- Current tools?
- Budget range?
- Timeline to implement?
Score < 60 = Blog content offer
Score 60-80 = Self-serve trial
Score > 80 = Sales call booking
3. Campaign Structure:
- Separate campaign for enterprise keywords
- Separate campaign for SMB keywords
- Different landing pages, different qualification levels
4. Negative Keywords:
Added: -free, -open source, -small business, -startup, -cheap, -alternative to [competitor targeting SMB]
Results:
- Clicks: Down 40%
- Cost: Down 35%
- Qualified leads: Up 60%
- Sales accepted leads: Up 180%
- Cost per qualified lead: Down 58%
Checklists & Templates
Campaign Audit Checklist (80/20 Version)
## Google Ads 80/20 Audit: [Account Name]
### 1. Data Pull (Last 90 Days)
- [ ] Export all keyword data with conversions
- [ ] Export Search Terms Report
- [ ] Export campaign/ad group performance
- [ ] Note current spend and ROAS
### 2. 80/20 Analysis
**Keywords:**
- Total active keywords: ___
- Keywords with 0 conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
- Keywords driving 80% of conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
- Keywords driving 50% of conversions: ___ (% of total: ___%)
**Campaigns:**
- Campaign driving most conversions: ___
- Campaign with worst ROAS: ___
### 3. Outer Layer Optimization
- [ ] Match types segmented? Y/N
- [ ] Negative keyword list comprehensive? Y/N
- [ ] All ad extensions enabled? Y/N
- [ ] Sitelinks
- [ ] Callouts
- [ ] Structured snippets
- [ ] Call extensions (if applicable)
- [ ] Location (if applicable)
### 4. Qualification Assessment
- [ ] Price/qualification in ad copy? Y/N
- [ ] Landing page qualifies visitors? Y/N
- [ ] Negative keywords block non-buyers? Y/N
### 5. Priority Actions
1. Quick win:
2. Biggest impact:
3. Scale opportunity:
### 6. Budget Reallocation
- Pause: $___/month
- Shift to winners: $___/month
- Test budget: $___/month
Campaign Structure Template
## Campaign Structure: [Product/Service]
### Campaign 1: Brand (Exact)
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Brand terms only
- Goal: Capture brand searches cheaply
### Campaign 2: Core Product (Exact)
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 40% of total
- Keywords: Top 20% performers
- Ad groups: 1 per keyword theme (5-10 keywords max)
- Goal: Maximum ROAS
### Campaign 3: Core Product (Phrase/BMM)
- Match type: Phrase + Broad Match Modifier
- Budget: 30% of total
- Keywords: Same as exact but expanded
- Goal: Discover new exact match candidates
### Campaign 4: Discovery (Broad)
- Match type: Broad
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Category-level terms
- Goal: Find new keyword opportunities
- Review: Weekly search terms report
### Campaign 5: Competitor
- Match type: Exact
- Budget: 10% of total
- Keywords: Competitor brand names
- Goal: Conquest qualified traffic
### Negative Keyword Master List
Apply to all campaigns:
- [Non-buyer terms]: free, cheap, DIY, etc.
- [Wrong audience]: jobs, careers, salary, etc.
- [Irrelevant]: [specific to your business]
Weekly Optimization Routine
## Weekly Google Ads Check: [Week of ___]
### 10-Minute Daily Check
- [ ] Budget pacing on track?
- [ ] Any major CPA spikes?
- [ ] Disapproved ads?
### Weekly Deep Dive (30 min)
**Search Terms Report:**
- New terms to add as exact: ___
- New negative keywords: ___
**Performance Review:**
- Top performer this week: ___
- Worst performer this week: ___
- Action taken: ___
**Ad Testing:**
- Tests running: ___
- Tests to conclude: ___
- New tests to start: ___
**Quality Score Check:**
- Keywords <6 QS: ___
- Action: ___
### Monthly Strategic Review
- [ ] 80/20 analysis updated
- [ ] Budget reallocation needed?
- [ ] New campaign opportunities?
- [ ] Scaling opportunities?
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Structuring persuasive content
- Applying copywriting frameworks
- Creating draft variations
- Analyzing competitor approaches
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Guarantee conversion rates
- Replace brand voice development
- Know your specific audience
- Make final approval decisions
References
- Books: Ultimate Guide to Google Ads, 80/20 Sales and Marketing by Perry Marshall
- Concepts: Peel and Stick, Racking the Shotgun, Five Power Disqualifiers
- Updates: Google Ads Help Center for latest features
- Source:
sources/books/marshall-google-ads-8020.md
Related Skills
- conversion-copywriting - Write ads that convert the right people
- landing-page-copy - Create landing pages that match ad intent
- copy-frameworks - AIDA, PAS for ad copy
- grand-slam-offers - Create offers worth advertising
- jobs-to-be-done - Understand what searchers really want
