| name | quantum-tomography-retrodiction-unified |
| description | Unified framework for quantum tomography and quantum retrodiction — proves Petz recovery map equals gradient update of log-likelihood in maximum-likelihood tomography, with noncommutative generalization for arbitrary quantum channels. Use when working with quantum tomography, quantum retrodiction, Petz recovery map, maximum-likelihood estimation, quantum channel inference, statistical inference in quantum systems, or gradient-based quantum state reconstruction. |
| metadata | {"arxiv_id":"2606.23777","published":"2026-06-22","authors":"Sebastian Murk, Ian Tan, Fabian Müller, Dominik Šafránek","tags":["quantum-tomography","quantum-retrodiction","petz-map","maximum-likelihood","quantum-channels","statistical-inference"]} |
Quantum Tomography-Retrodiction Unified Framework
Methodology from arXiv:2606.23777 bridging quantum tomography and quantum retrodiction.
Core Insight
Quantum tomography and quantum retrodiction are manifestations of the same underlying principle:
Petz recovery map = Gradient update of log-likelihood
Key Results
-
Equivalence theorem: For measurement channel E, the Petz recovery map R_E,σ is precisely the gradient update used in maximum-likelihood tomography.
-
Monotonic likelihood: Repeated applications of the Petz map monotonically increase the likelihood function.
-
Noncommutative generalization: Extends beyond measurement channels to arbitrary quantum channels via gradient of generalized likelihood.
-
Iterative maximization: The resulting procedure maximizes likelihood for general quantum tomography.
Mathematical Framework
Petz Recovery Map
For channel E and reference state σ:
R_E,σ(Y) = σ^(1/2) E†(E(σ)^(-1/2) Y E(σ)^(-1/2)) σ^(1/2)
Connection to MLE
Given measurement data D, the log-likelihood L(ρ) = log P(D|ρ):
ρ_{n+1} = R_E,ρ_n (ρ_measured)
is equivalent to gradient ascent on L(ρ).
Usage Patterns
When to Apply
- Quantum state tomography with limited measurement data
- Quantum process tomography for unknown channels
- Retrodiction: inferring past states from current measurements
- Iterative reconstruction algorithms
- Statistical inference in quantum experiments
When NOT to Apply
- Compressed sensing tomography (different regime)
- Direct fidelity estimation (single observable)
- Classical statistical problems
Practical Implementation
def petz_tomography_iteration(rho, measurement_data, measurement_channel, n_iter=100):
"""
Iterative quantum tomography using Petz recovery map.
rho: initial state estimate
measurement_data: observed measurement outcomes
measurement_channel: quantum channel E describing measurement
n_iter: number of iterations
"""
for _ in range(n_iter):
sigma = measurement_channel(rho)
sigma_inv_sqrt = matrix_power(sigma, -0.5)
rho_inv_sqrt = matrix_power(rho, 0.5)
recovered = rho_inv_sqrt @ measurement_channel.adjoint(
sigma_inv_sqrt @ measurement_data @ sigma_inv_sqrt
) @ rho_inv_sqrt
rho = recovered / trace(recovered)
return rho
Pitfalls
- Singular reference state: Petz map requires invertible σ; use regularization for near-singular states
- Non-measurement channels: Noncommutative generalization requires careful handling of arbitrary channel structure
- Convergence: Monotonic likelihood increase doesn't guarantee fast convergence; may need acceleration techniques