codexkit-onboarding-plan-creator

name	codexkit-onboarding-plan-creator
description	Create structured employee onboarding plans using the 30-60-90 day framework aligned with SHRM best practices. Cover pre-boarding, Day 1, Week 1, and monthly milestones with task owners, success criteria, and buddy assignments. Use when hiring new employees or revamping the onboarding process.
version	1.0.0
category	scaffolding

Onboarding Plan Creator

When to Use

• When a new hire is confirmed and start date is set
• When HR or a hiring manager needs a structured onboarding checklist
• When revamping the onboarding process for a team or department
• When onboarding remote or hybrid employees

Procedure

Step 1 — Pre-Boarding (Before Day 1)

1. Send welcome email with start date, dress code, parking, and first-day agenda
2. Set up accounts: email, Slack, HRIS, project tools, VPN
3. Assign buddy/mentor from the team
4. Prepare workstation (physical or virtual)
5. Share pre-reading: company handbook, team wiki, org chart

Step 2 — Day 1

1. Welcome meeting with manager (30 min)
2. HR orientation: policies, benefits enrollment, emergency contacts
3. IT setup verification
4. Buddy introduction and office/virtual tour
5. First lunch with team

Step 3 — Week 1

1. Role overview and expectations alignment with manager
2. Meet key stakeholders (1:1 coffee chats)
3. Review current projects and team roadmap
4. Complete compliance training (security, harassment, data privacy)
5. End-of-week check-in with manager

Step 4 — 30-Day Milestone

1. Complete all mandatory training
2. Understand team processes and tools
3. Take ownership of first small task or project
4. Feedback session with manager: "What's going well? What's confusing?"
5. Buddy check-in

Step 5 — 60-Day Milestone

1. Contribute independently to team deliverables
2. Build relationships across departments
3. Identify one process improvement suggestion
4. Manager feedback: progress vs expectations
5. Probation mid-point review (if applicable)

Step 6 — 90-Day Milestone

1. Fully integrated into team workflows
2. Set first performance goals (aligned with team OKRs)
3. Present a "What I've learned" summary to team (optional)
4. Manager evaluation: confirm role fit and probation pass
5. Transition from onboarding to regular 1:1 cadence

Inputs

Input	Required	Format
Role / job title	Yes	Text
Department	Yes	Text
Start date	Yes	Date
Reporting manager	Yes	Name
Tools/systems used	Recommended	List
Buddy assignment	Recommended	Name

Output

## Onboarding Plan — [Name] — [Role] — Start: [Date]

### Pre-Boarding Checklist

| Task | Owner | Due | Done |
|------|-------|-----|------|
| Send welcome email | HR | D-7 | ☐ |
| Set up email + Slack + tools | IT | D-3 | ☐ |
| Assign buddy: [Name] | Manager | D-5 | ☐ |
| Prepare workstation | IT/Office | D-1 | ☐ |
| Share pre-reading pack | HR | D-3 | ☐ |

### Day 1

| Time | Activity | With |
|------|----------|------|
| 9:00 | Welcome + expectations | Manager |
| 10:00 | HR orientation | HR |
| 11:00 | IT setup verification | IT |
| 12:00 | Team lunch | Team |
| 14:00 | Buddy introduction + tour | Buddy |
| 16:00 | Day 1 wrap-up | Manager |

### 30-60-90 Day Milestones

| Milestone | Success Criteria | Check-in Owner |
|-----------|-----------------|----------------|
| Day 30 | All training complete, first task delivered | Manager |
| Day 60 | Independent contribution, cross-team relationships | Manager |
| Day 90 | Full integration, performance goals set, probation passed | Manager + HR |

Definition of Done

• Pre-boarding checklist with task owners and due dates
• Day 1 schedule with specific activities
• 30-60-90 milestones with success criteria
• Buddy/mentor assigned
• Check-in cadence defined
• Customized to role and department

Examples

Prompt

We are onboarding a new Senior Product Manager starting April 1.
Department: Product. Reports to: VP Product.
Tools: Jira, Figma, Slack, Notion, Looker.
Create a complete 30-60-90 day onboarding plan with pre-boarding checklist.

Quality Criteria

• All placeholder sections are filled with domain-specific content
• Structure follows the relevant industry standard or framework
• Language matches target audience (technical / executive / legal)
• Output is ready for review — not a rough draft requiring major rework

Verification (4C)

Check	Question
Correctness	Does the draft structure follow the stated framework or industry standard?
Completeness	Are all required sections present with substantive (not placeholder) content?
Context-fit	Does tone, detail level, and terminology match the intended audience?
Consequence	If sent to the intended recipient without further editing, what would fail?

Edge Cases

• No existing template for this type — Use the closest available template and document all customizations made.
• Stakeholder requirements conflict — Flag conflicts explicitly in the draft. Do not silently choose one requirement over another.
• Output required in multiple formats — Produce the canonical format first, then derive others. Note any formatting limitations.

Changelog

• v1.0.0 — Initial release