Use when system, user, repository, domain, AI-Psychiatry, skill, memory, or task-state instructions appear incompatible.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Menu
Skills dans ce dépôt
SkillsMP a collecté 79 skills depuis ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry. Ouvrez un skill pour examiner sa source et ses détails.
ihabkhaled/AI-PsychiatryAffichage de 39 skills collectés sur 79.
Use when system, user, repository, domain, AI-Psychiatry, skill, memory, or task-state instructions appear incompatible.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when adjacent work is called required without dependency proof, or inconvenient required work is marked optional.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when different commands, tools, runners, plans, or agents repeat the same hypothesis and evidence target.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when implementation, parking, blocking, strategy switching, or completion happens before critical understanding and evidence exist.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when analysis paralysis, speculative branching, repeated replanning, premature architecture work, or indecision blocks a reversible implementation or test.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when objective switching, novelty chasing, repeated context switching, optional branches, or ADHD-like distraction as a behavioral analogy interrupts delivery.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when debugging, architecture inspection, research, or repository exploration risks becoming open-ended, recursive, speculative, or disconnected from a decision.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when requested behavior appears complete, remaining work is optional, perfectionism delays delivery, or the agent continues auditing, refining, testing, or researching after proof.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when a long session, large tool output, repeated discussion, or handoff needs a compact state that preserves decisions and enables continuation.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when active context is large, stale, contradictory, repeatedly reread, or no longer represents current source and task state.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when choosing which repository instructions, architecture, domain knowledge, files, tests, or deep guidance to load for a task without reading everything.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when reviewers or judges repeat rounds, invent requirements, block on style, expand scope, or continue after correctness, security, regression, and explicit requirements are satisfied.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when no productive next action can be selected because dependencies, authority, contradictory constraints, missing access, or unresolved evidence block progress.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when files, services, commands, tests, APIs, configuration, architecture, publication, or runtime results are assumed without an authoritative repository or tool source.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when a task needs explicit control of objective, scope, priority, nesting, retries, verification, progress, drift, recovery, or termination.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use after a non-trivial, recurring, or expensive failure when a concise evidenced lesson could prevent future repeated investigation.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when the requested outcome is unclear, silently changing, being reinterpreted by discoveries, or disconnected from the active implementation.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when work moves to another agent, session, person, or environment and the recipient needs enough state to continue without a sprawling narrative.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when repository architecture, rules, skills, commands, context routing, manifests, or generated AI knowledge change and dependent sources may become stale.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when activity is high but requirements, blockers, tests, and deliverables remain unchanged across repeated edit, search, test, review, or planning cycles.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when commands, searches, file reads, edits, tests, critics, plans, context reloads, or strategies repeat without new evidence or acceptance progress.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when deciding whether task discoveries, decisions, preferences, architecture, failures, or lessons deserve durable repository memory.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when two or more agents work concurrently, delegation may recurse, responsibilities overlap, dependencies can deadlock, or a coordinator must preserve scope and termination.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when status is unclear, activity is high, completion estimates feel unreliable, or the agent may be mistaking reading, reasoning, tools, or churn for progress.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when packages, services, ownership boundaries, entrypoints, tests, commands, or dependencies changed and the compact repository map needs a focused update.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when continuing work from saved task state, a compacted session, a handoff, or a new agent without rereading the entire repository.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when newly discovered work, technical debt, refactors, audits, optimizations, or reviewer suggestions threaten to expand the user-authorized task.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when three same-strategy attempts fail, two approaches oscillate without evidence, or the current abstraction and evidence source cannot resolve the blocker.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when selecting development and final validation commands so evidence is sufficient without repeatedly running expensive or irrelevant suites.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when beginning any plan, audit, investigation, modification, review, test, or expensive tool action before the primary objective and completion conditions are explicit.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when deciding what evidence is required, whether previous proof remains valid, or whether repeated testing has become reassurance rather than necessary verification.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when the agent changes objectives, chases optional discoveries, context-switches repeatedly, abandons the active item, or shows ADHD-like distraction as a behavioral analogy.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when requested behavior appears complete, optional polishing continues, perfectionism delays delivery, reviewers suggest non-blocking work, or the agent cannot stop after proof.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when repository claims are unsupported, searches find no source, the agent assumes files or services exist, publication or test status is uncertain, or a speculative architecture may become implementation.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when a coding agent is distracted, overthinking, repeatedly checking, recursively investigating, hallucinating repository facts, looping, expanding scope, or failing to stop after completion.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when tasks open tasks inside tasks, investigation depth exceeds three, subagents delegate recursively, a local bug becomes architecture redesign, or box-inside-box behavior prevents delivery.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when actions repeat without progress, strategies oscillate, the same failure reaches three attempts, four cycles produce no outcome, or no valid next action exists.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when an agent reruns equivalent checks, seeks reassurance after valid proof, repeats critics, cannot accept sufficient evidence, or shows OCD-like checking as a behavioral analogy.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when analysis paralysis, speculative branch explosion, repeated replanning, architecture rabbit holes, or indecision prevents a bounded implementation or evidence-producing action.
Langue du texte source : anglais