| name | multica-review-product |
| description | Requirements/PRD dedicated review framework. Called by ProductReviewer to professionally analyze ProductManager's PRD (scope clear/goal explicit/acceptance testable/constraints complete/open items), output PASS/FAIL + fix list, report to Leader. |
Requirements (PRD) Professional Review (ProductReviewer)
Structured professional review framework for PRD / requirement artifacts. Called by ProductReviewer; reviews the PRD link ProductManager returns via multica-artifact-req-sync.
When to use
- ProductReviewer receives a "review PRD" dispatch from Leader.
- Entering a re-review round after PRD changes (check previous round's fix list item by item).
Review dimensions (conclusion per item)
- Scope clear: boundaries unambiguous, splittable, no implied scope.
- Goal explicit: problem measurable, no vagueness.
- Acceptance testable: every AC- objectively verifiable, no "good experience" vagueness.
- Constraints complete: permissions, exceptions, compliance, dependencies, data口径 listed.
- Open items: OP- fully listed, not blocking downstream dev (blocking OP- = blocking item).
Output format
【PRD Review】<PRD link>
Conclusion: PASS / FAIL
Blocking items (required on FAIL, each: rationale / involved point / fix direction):
- ...
Suggestions (non-blocking):
- ...
Previous fix-list check (re-review): resolved X / unresolved Y
Round: N / 3
Conclusion + fix list reported to Leader; don't modify PRD or notify ProductManager yourself.
Boundaries
- Review only PRD/requirements, not design, code, test cases, or UI.
- Don't replace Leader's generic gate (multica-verification skill).
- Technical feasibility goes to ArchReviewer; you own requirement-layer quality.
- Still FAIL at round 3 → mark "escalate to human", hand to Leader, stop looping.