Menu
CRO lens — are real users excluded from converting by contrast, target size, focus, or semantics? Surveyed by the Analyst.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC
CRO lens — does the wording lead with the visitor's value, specifically and concretely? Surveyed by the Analyst.
CRO lens — is the primary action obvious, singular, and labeled with a value-bearing verb? Surveyed by the Analyst.
CRO lens — what steps, fields, or hesitation points stand between intent and completion? Surveyed by the Analyst.
CRO lens — is slowness (LCP/CLS/INP) the thing suppressing conversion? Surveyed by the Analyst.
CRO lens — does the block show that others already chose this, at the moment of decision? Surveyed by the Analyst.
CRO lens — is there an honest reason to act now rather than later? Surveyed by the Analyst.
| name | cro-accessibility-as-conversion |
| description | CRO lens — are real users excluded from converting by contrast, target size, focus, or semantics? Surveyed by the Analyst. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0"} |
Lens question: Is anyone being prevented from completing the action — low contrast, tiny tap targets, keyboard traps, missing labels — such that fixing access is a conversion lift, not just compliance?
Signal of the gap (DOM/RUM):
a.button), target < 44px, action
reachable only by mouse, unlabeled controls, broken heading hierarchy in the
block's decorated DOM, images missing alt text — the same items the EDS
code-review checklist flags.Variant kind it implies: CSS-only for contrast, target size, focus-visible styling. Mixed if semantics/ARIA need repair inside the block's decorate path. This lens is also a guardrail — a variant from another lens must never regress it (the block manifest carries an accessibility guardrail the Validator enforces).