Skip to main content

kubernetes-operator

Use when building a Kubernetes Operator — custom controllers that reconcile CRD state. Triggers on "build an operator", "CRD design", "reconcile loop", "controller-runtime", "kubebuilder", "operator-sdk", "metacontroller", "KOPF", "operator capability levels", or "custom resource".

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
JantonioFC/skillsbank
Dernière activité de la source
4 août 2026 à 03:15
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
6
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
kubernetes-operator
description
Use when building a Kubernetes Operator — custom controllers that reconcile CRD state. Triggers on "build an operator", "CRD design", "reconcile loop", "controller-runtime", "kubebuilder", "operator-sdk", "metacontroller", "KOPF", "operator capability levels", or "custom resource".
context
fork
version
2.9.0
author
claude-code-skills
license
MIT
tags
["kubernetes","operator","crd","controller-runtime","kubebuilder","operator-sdk","metacontroller","kopf","reconcile","devops"]
compatible_tools
["claude-code","codex-cli","cursor","antigravity","opencode","gemini-cli"]
# Kubernetes Operator Build operators that reconcile correctly. Most operator bugs are not Kubernetes bugs — they are reconcile-loop bugs: missing finalizers, blocking calls, no requeue on transient errors, status drift, RBAC over-grants. This skill catches them deterministically before they reach a cluster. ## When to use - Building a new Kubernetes Operator (controller for a CRD) - Reviewing an existing operator for capability-level gaps - Auditing a CRD spec for status/conditions/finalizer correctness - Choosing a framework (controller-runtime / kubebuilder / operator-sdk / metacontroller / KOPF) - Designing the API surface of a Custom Resource - Hardening RBAC, leader election, or webhook validation ## When NOT to use - Plain Helm chart packaging → use `helm-chart-builder` - Standard kubectl operations / blue-green deploys → use `senior-devops` - General k8s security posture → use `cloud-security` - "I want to run a workload" — that's a Deployment / Job, not an operator ## Core principle: an operator is a reconcile loop, not a script ``` observe(actual) → desired = read(spec) → diff(actual, desired) → act → update(status) ↓ requeue / done ``` Operators that fail are the ones that: 1. Treat reconcile as imperative (do this, then this, then this) instead of declarative (make actual=desired, idempotently) 2. Don't requeue transient failures 3. Don't use finalizers, leaving orphan resources 4. Mutate spec instead of status 5. Don't use the status subresource (status updates trigger spec reconciles → loop) 6. Block in reconcile (long HTTP calls, locks) 7. Forget leader election → split-brain on multi-replica deploys The 3 tools below catch each of these. ## Quick start ```bash SKILL=engineering/kubernetes-operator/skills/kubernetes-operator # Validate a CRD design python "$SKILL/scripts/crd_validator.py" --crd config/crd/myapp.yaml # Lint a Go reconcile function python "$SKILL/scripts/reconcile_lint.py" --controller controllers/myapp_controller.go # Score against OperatorHub Capability Levels (1-5) python "$SKILL/scripts/operator_capability_audit.py" --operator-dir . ``` ## The 3 Python tools All stdlib-only. Run with `--help`. ### `crd_validator.py` Validates a CRD YAML against operator-pattern best practices. ```bash python scripts/crd_validator.py --crd config/crd/myapp.yaml python scripts/crd_validator.py --crd config/crd/ --format json ``` **Checks:** - `spec.versions[*].subresources.status` is set (status subresource) - `spec.scope` is `Namespaced` (not `Cluster`) unless explicitly justified - Singular and listKind defined - `spec.versions[*].schema.openAPIV3Schema` has type definitions (no `x-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields: true` at top level) - A version is marked `served: true` AND `storage: true` - Conditions array is in the schema (allows `metav1.Conditions`) - Printer columns include `Age` and `Status`/`Phase` ### `reconcile_lint.py` Lints a Go controller reconcile function for anti-patterns. ```bash python scripts/reconcile_lint.py --controller controllers/myapp_controller.go ``` **Checks (regex-based heuristics):** - Returns are `(ctrl.Result, error)` shape - Errors trigger a non-zero requeue (`return ctrl.Result{Requeue: true}, err`) - `client.Update()` on the spec object is flagged (controllers should update only status) - `time.Sleep` inside reconcile is flagged (use `RequeueAfter`) - HTTP calls without context cancellation are flagged - Missing `defer` after a finalizer add - No `IsConditionTrue` / `SetCondition` calls when conditions present in CRD - Reconcile function exceeds 80 lines (extract subroutines) ### `operator_capability_audit.py` Scores an operator against OperatorHub's 5 Capability Levels. ```bash python scripts/operator_capability_audit.py --operator-dir . ``` **Levels:** - **L1 — Basic Install:** CRD defined, controller deploys it - **L2 — Seamless Upgrades:** PDBs, conversion webhooks, version skew strategy - **L3 — Full Lifecycle:** backups, restores, failure recovery - **L4 — Deep Insights:** metrics endpoint, Prometheus rules, alerts - **L5 — Auto Pilot:** auto-scaling, auto-tuning, anomaly detection Reports current level + concrete next steps to advance one level. ## Tooling landscape Pick a framework based on language and complexity. See `references/tooling_landscape.md`. | Framework | Language | Best for | Maintenance | |---|---|---|---| | **controller-runtime** | Go | Production-grade, low-level control | Active (sig-api-machinery) | | **kubebuilder** | Go | Standard scaffolding, opinionated | Active (Kubernetes SIGs) | | **operator-sdk** | Go / Helm / Ansible | OpenShift / mixed-paradigm teams | Active (Red Hat) | | **metacontroller** | Any (webhook-based) | Polyglot teams, avoiding Go | Less active | | **KOPF** | Python | Python shops, async-first | Active (community) | | **java-operator-sdk** | Java | JVM shops | Active (Red Hat / Java SIG) | Decision rules: - New operator + Go shop → kubebuilder - New operator + Python shop → KOPF - New operator + can't pick a language → metacontroller - OpenShift target → operator-sdk ## CRD design principles See `references/crd_design.md` for full detail. Quick rules: 1. **status is the source of truth for the controller's view of the world.** Spec is what the user wants; status is what the controller observed. 2. **Use the status subresource.** Without it, status updates re-trigger reconcile (loop). 3. **Use Conditions.** `Ready`, `Reconciling`, `Degraded`. Each carries a reason and message. 4. **Add finalizers.** Without finalizers, deletion races the controller and orphans external resources. 5. **Version your CRD from day 1.** `v1alpha1` → `v1beta1` → `v1`. Plan a conversion webhook. 6. **Validate via OpenAPI v3 schema.** Don't rely on the controller for validation that should fail at admission. 7. **Use `additionalPrinterColumns` for `kubectl get`.** Show `Age`, `Phase`, `Ready` at minimum. 8. **Namespace your CRDs unless they manage cluster-scoped resources.** ## Reconcile loop principles See `references/reconcile_loop.md` for full detail. Quick rules: 1. **Idempotent.** Reconciling the same state twice → same result, zero side effects. 2. **Read once, decide, act.** Don't observe the world repeatedly during reconcile. 3. **Update status, not spec.** Spec belongs to the user. 4. **Return errors that requeue.** Use `ctrl.Result{RequeueAfter: ...}` for known transient cases. 5. **Never block.** No `time.Sleep`. No long HTTP calls without context. 6. **Use the cache.** Read via the controller's cached client; only escape the cache for a specific reason. 7. **Leader-elect when running >1 replica.** Otherwise enable single-replica mode. 8. **Set OwnerReferences.** Cascading deletion is the operator pattern's free gift. ## Workflows ### Workflow 1: Bootstrap a new operator (Go + kubebuilder) ``` 1. Pick a Group/Version/Kind: e.g., apps.example.com/v1alpha1, kind=MyApp 2. kubebuilder init --domain example.com --repo github.com/org/myapp-operator 3. kubebuilder create api --group apps --version v1alpha1 --kind MyApp 4. Run crd_validator.py on config/crd/bases/apps.example.com_myapps.yaml → Fix every WARN before writing controller code 5. Implement the reconcile function (Karpathy principle 2: simplest correct version first) 6. Run reconcile_lint.py on controllers/myapp_controller.go 7. Run operator_capability_audit.py --operator-dir . — confirm L1 8. Test in a kind cluster: kubectl apply -f config/samples/ 9. Add status conditions; aim for L2 in the same PR ``` ### Workflow 2: Audit an existing operator ``` 1. Run operator_capability_audit.py --operator-dir <path> 2. Run crd_validator.py --crd config/crd/ 3. Run reconcile_lint.py --controller controllers/ 4. Triage findings: - FAIL → block release; fix before next deploy - WARN → file an issue; fix in next 30 days 5. Document current capability level in README; commit 6. Plan one capability level advancement per quarter ``` ### Workflow 3: Choose a framework ``` 1. Identify primary language constraint (team skill) 2. Identify deployment target (vanilla k8s vs OpenShift) 3. Identify operator complexity (single CRD vs multi-CRD vs cluster-wide) 4. Cross-reference with references/tooling_landscape.md 5. Build a 1-week proof-of-concept before committing ``` ## References - `references/operator_pattern.md` — what an operator IS, when to use vs alternatives - `references/crd_design.md` — CRD design principles, versioning, conversion webhooks - `references/reconcile_loop.md` — reconcile patterns, error handling, idempotency - `references/tooling_landscape.md` — framework comparison + decision tree ## Slash command `/operator-audit` — Run all 3 tools on an operator repo and produce a markdown report. ## Asset templates - `assets/crd_template.yaml` — CRD with status subresource, conditions, finalizer hint, printer columns - `assets/reconcile_skeleton.go` — Go controller reconcile function with idempotency, conditions, finalizers, requeue patterns ## Anti-patterns - **`time.Sleep(30 * time.Second)` inside reconcile** — block other reconciles. Use `RequeueAfter`. - **`r.Client.Update(ctx, obj)` to set status** — use `r.Status().Update(ctx, obj)` instead. - **No leader election + 2+ replicas** — split-brain. - **No finalizer** — external resources orphan on deletion. - **CRD without status subresource** — status updates trigger spec reconciles (infinite loop). - **Reconcile function > 200 lines** — extract reconcileXxx subroutines per condition. - **`x-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields: true` on spec root** — defeats validation. - **Imperative reconcile** — "if creating, do A; if updating, do B; if deleting, do C". Wrong shape. Reconcile = make actual=desired, regardless of how we got here. ## Verifiable success A team using this skill should achieve: - 100% of new CRDs pass `crd_validator.py` before merge - All reconcile functions pass `reconcile_lint.py` strict mode - Operators reach OperatorHub Capability Level 3 (Full Lifecycle) before public release - Mean time to fix a reconcile bug: <1 day (no infinite loops in production) ## Activation Triggers Ships CRD validator, reconcile-loop linter, and OperatorHub capability auditor (all stdlib Python), 4 references on the operator pattern + CRD design + reconcile patterns + tooling landscape, and a /operator-audit slash command. NOT a generic k8s skill — specifically the Operator pattern.
Voir sur GitHub