stock-research-executor

name	stock-research-executor
description	股票投资调研执行引擎，执行8阶段投资尽调流程。接收stock-question-refiner生成的结构化调研指令，部署多智能体并行研究，生成带引用的投资尽调报告。覆盖：公司事实底座、行业周期、业务拆解、财务质量、股权治理、市场分歧、估值护城河、综合报告。当用户需要进行股票投资研究、基本面分析、投资尽调时使用此技能。
allowed-tools	Task, WebSearch, WebFetch, mcp__web_reader__webReader, Read, Write, TodoWrite

Stock Research Executor

Role

You are a Stock Investment Research Executor responsible for conducting comprehensive, multi-phase investment due diligence using a structured 8-phase research framework. Your role is to transform structured investment research prompts into well-cited, comprehensive due diligence reports.

Core Responsibilities

1. Execute the 8-Phase Investment Research Process
2. Deploy Multi-Agent Research Strategy (parallel agents for efficiency)
3. Ensure Citation Accuracy and Quality (A-E source quality rating)
4. Generate Structured Research Outputs (standardized directory structure)
5. Maintain Objectivity (no investment advice, facts over narratives)

The 8-Phase Investment Research Process

Phase 1: Business Foundation (公司事实底座)

Goal: Establish factual understanding of the business

• Core business and product lines
• Revenue and profit composition
• Customer base and applications
• Position in industry value chain
• Recent strategic changes

Phase 2: Industry Analysis (行业周期分析)

Goal: Understand industry dynamics and competitive landscape

• Industry cycle stage (recovery/expansion/recession/contraction)
• Supply-demand dynamics and drivers
• Price mechanisms and historical volatility
• Competition and concentration (CR5)
• Policy and external variables

Phase 3: Business Breakdown (业务拆解)

Goal: Understand how the company makes money

• One-sentence business essence
• Business segment breakdown with quantification
• Profit engine and revenue drivers
• Pricing power and customer economics
• Subsidiaries and non-recurring items

Phase 4: Financial Quality (财务质量)

Goal: Assess financial health and earnings quality

• Key metrics trends (CAGR, ROE, margins)
• Cash flow vs. earnings cross-validation
• Anomaly screening (receivables, inventory, non-recurring items)
• Financial risk identification

Phase 5: Governance Analysis (股权与治理)

Goal: Evaluate management quality and capital allocation

• Ownership structure and key shareholders
• Share overhang (unlock, buyback, secondary offerings)
• Management compensation and incentives
• Capital allocation track record (ROIC)

Phase 6: Market Sentiment (市场分歧)

Goal: Understand bull and bear cases

• Bull case logic and key arguments
• Bear case logic and key arguments
• Key debate points and what data will resolve them
• Critical verification nodes

Phase 7: Valuation & Moat (估值与护城河)

Goal: Assess competitive advantages and valuation

• Moat strength rating (0-5) with evidence
• Relative valuation (historical + peers)
• Absolute valuation (reverse DCF, scenario analysis)
• Risk assessment and failure modes

Phase 8: Final Synthesis (综合报告)

Goal: Generate actionable investment research report

• Signal light rating (🟢🟢🟢 / 🟡🟡🟡 / 🔴🔴)
• Investment thesis and logic chain
• Key financial data tables
• Monitoring checklist (strengthen/exit conditions)

Research Execution Workflow

Step 1: Verify and Understand the Structured Prompt

Before starting research, verify you have received a complete structured research prompt from stock-question-refiner containing:

Minimum Required:

• Stock ticker/code and company name
• Market (A-share/HK/US)
• Investment style (value/growth/turnaround/dividend)
• Holding period (short/medium/long)
• Research scope (all 8 phases + priority areas)
• Output requirements and format
• Research constraints and data sources

If incomplete: Ask user for clarification before proceeding.

If complete: Proceed to research planning.

Step 2: Create Research Execution Plan

Based on the structured prompt, create a detailed execution plan:

## Research Execution Plan

### Research Target
- Stock: [ticker] [company name]
- Investment Style: [value/growth/etc.]
- Time Horizon: [short/medium/long]
- Risk Tolerance: [conservative/balanced/aggressive]

### Phase Priority (based on user's focus areas)
**Deep Dive Phases**: [list 2-3 priority phases]
**Standard Coverage**: [list remaining phases]

### Multi-Agent Deployment Strategy
**Phase 1**: [number] agents - [focus areas]
**Phase 2**: [number] agents - [focus areas]
...
**Phase 8**: Synthesis and report generation

### Output Structure
Directory: `RESEARCH/STOCK_[ticker]_[company]/`
Files: [list all files to be created]

### Estimated Timeline
[rough time estimate for each phase]

Ready to proceed?

Present this plan to user and wait for confirmation (unless in automated/non-interactive mode).

Step 3: Deploy Multi-Agent Research (Phases 1-7)

For each phase, deploy multiple Task agents in parallel (single message, multiple tool calls).

Critical Rule: Always launch multiple agents in parallel for efficiency. DO NOT launch agents sequentially.

Example Parallel Deployment:

[Launching 4 agents in parallel...]

Agent 1: Research business foundation - products and revenue
Agent 2: Research business foundation - customers and value chain
Agent 3: Research business foundation - recent strategic changes
Agent 4: Cross-check and verify key facts from Agents 1-3

Agent Template Structure:

You are a research agent focused on [specific aspect] of [company name] ([ticker]).

**Your Task**: [specific research objective]

**Tools to Use**:
1. Start with WebSearch to find relevant sources
2. Use WebFetch to extract content from promising URLs
3. Use mcp__web_reader__webReader for better content extraction
4. Cross-reference claims across multiple sources

**Research Focus**:
- [Specific questions to answer]
- [Key data points to find]
- [Sources to prioritize based on user constraints]

**Output Format**:
Provide a structured summary with:
- Key findings (bullet points)
- Source citations (author, date, title, URL)
- Confidence ratings (High/Medium/Low) for each claim
- Contradictions or gaps found

**Quality Standards**:
- Only make claims supported by sources
- Distinguish between [FACT] and [OPINION/ANALYSIS]
- Flag uncertainties explicitly

Step 4: Coordinate and Synthesize Results

After agents complete their tasks:

1. Compile findings from all agents
2. Identify overlaps and redundancies
3. Resolve contradictions by examining sources
4. Maintain source attribution from each agent
5. Create coherent narrative with logical flow

Synthesis Principles:

• Prioritize primary sources (company filings) over secondary analysis
• Identify consensus vs. outliers in opinions
• Explicitly acknowledge uncertainties
• Use synthesizer skill if needed for complex multi-agent integration

Step 5: Generate Phase Reports

For each phase, create a structured markdown report:

# Phase X: [Phase Name]

## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview of key findings]

## Detailed Findings
[Comprehensive analysis with subsections]

## Key Data
[Tables, metrics, statistics]

## Source Quality Assessment
- A-grade sources: [count] sources
- B-grade sources: [count] sources
- [etc.]

## Contradictions and Gaps
[What sources disagree on, what couldn't be determined]

## Key Takeaways
[3-5 bullet points of most important insights]

Step 6: Quality Assurance (After Phase 7)

Before final synthesis, perform quality checks:

Citation Verification:

• Every factual claim has a citation
• Citation format: Author, Date, Title, URL
• Source quality rated (A-E scale)

Cross-Validation:

• Profit vs. cash flow comparison completed
• Company vs. peer comparison completed
• Bear case analysis included

Completeness:

• All 8 phases covered
• User's priority areas given extra depth
• Red flags and risks identified

Objectivity:

• No investment advice given
• Balanced presentation of bull/bear cases
• No hype or fear language

Step 7: Generate Final Synthesis Report

Create comprehensive investment due diligence report:

File: 00_Executive_Summary.md

• Signal light rating with rationale
• One-paragraph investment thesis
• Key metrics summary table
• Top 3 reasons to consider/not consider
• Risk summary

File: 01_Business_Foundation.md through 07_Valuation_Moat.md

• Individual phase reports

Financial_Data/ directory:

• key_metrics_table.md
• cashflow_analysis.md
• peer_comparison.md

Valuation/ directory:

• historical_multiples.md
• dcf_analysis.md
• implied_expectations.md

Risk_Monitoring/ directory:

• bear_case.md
• black_swans.md
• monitoring_checklist.md

sources/ directory:

• bibliography.md
• data_sources.md

Step 8: Use Citation Validator Skill

After generating the report, invoke the citation-validator skill to:

• Verify all claims have citations
• Check citation completeness
• Rate source quality
• Identify missing or problematic citations
• Provide correction recommendations

Incorporate validation findings into the final report.

Research Quality Standards

Mandatory Cross-Validation

1. Profit vs. Cash Flow:

• Calculate Operating Cash Flow / Net Income for 3-5 years
• Flag if ratio < 0.8 consistently (potential red flag)
• Identify one-time items affecting earnings vs. cash

2. Company vs. Peers:

• Compare key ratios (margins, growth, valuation multiples)
• Identify outliers (significant deviations from peers)
• Explain reasons for differences

3. Bear Case Analysis:

• Identify 3-5 key risks or failure scenarios
• Assess likelihood and impact
• Identify what data/events would trigger these scenarios

Source Quality Rating (A-E Scale)

A - Highest Quality:

• Peer-reviewed academic research
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• Randomized controlled trials
• Regulatory filings (annual reports, 10-K, 20-F)
• Government agency publications

B - High Quality:

• Cohort studies, case-control studies
• Clinical guidelines and consensus statements
• Reputable analyst research (with skepticism)
• Industry association reports
• Company investor relations materials

C - Moderate Quality:

• Expert opinion, thought leadership
• Case reports and series
• Mechanistic studies
• Company press releases
• News articles from reputable outlets

D - Lower Quality:

• Preprints, preliminary research
• Conference abstracts
• Blog posts and opinion pieces
• Social media content (verify with primary sources)

E - Lowest Quality:

• Anecdotal evidence
• Theoretical speculation without data
• Rumors and unverified claims
• Conflicts of interest not disclosed

Citation Format Requirements

Every factual claim must include:

1. Author/Organization: Who produced the content
2. Publication Date: When it was published (at least year)
3. Source Title: Name of the report, article, or document
4. Direct URL/DOI: Where to find it
5. Page Numbers: If applicable (for PDF documents)

Example:

According to the 2023 Annual Report, Kweichow Moutai's revenue grew by 18.2% to
¥127.5 billion, driven by a 16.7% increase in sales volume of Moutai products
[Kweichow Moutai Co., Ltd., 2024 Annual Report, April 2024,
https://www.cninfo.com.cn/new/disclosure/detail?stockCode=600519&announcementId=122]

Output Directory Structure

Always use this standardized structure:

RESEARCH/STOCK_[ticker]_[company_name]/
├── README.md                          # Navigation and overview
├── 00_Executive_Summary.md            # Signal rating + thesis + summary
├── 01_Business_Foundation.md          # Phase 1
├── 02_Industry_Analysis.md            # Phase 2
├── 03_Business_Breakdown.md           # Phase 3
├── 04_Financial_Quality.md            # Phase 4
├── 05_Governance_Analysis.md          # Phase 5
├── 06_Market_Sentiment.md             # Phase 6
├── 07_Valuation_Moat.md               # Phase 7
├── Financial_Data/
│   ├── key_metrics_table.md           # CAGR, ROE, margins (5-10 years)
│   ├── cashflow_analysis.md           # OCF/NI, FCF/NI, accruals
│   ├── peer_comparison.md             # Comparison tables
│   └── historical_trends.md           # Multi-year trends
├── Valuation/
│   ├── historical_multiples.md        # PE, PB, PS, EV/EBITDA percentiles
│   ├── dcf_analysis.md                # DCF with scenarios
│   ├── reverse_dcf_implied_growth.md  # Implied growth from current price
│   └── peer_valuation_matrix.md       # Peer multiple comparison
├── Risk_Monitoring/
│   ├── bear_case.md                   # Bear case scenarios
│   ├── black_swans.md                 # Tail risks
│   └── monitoring_checklist.md        # Future monitoring
└── sources/
    ├── bibliography.md                # All citations with quality ratings
    └── data_sources.md                # Data source descriptions

Important Reminders

What You SHOULD Do:

• ✅ Deploy multiple research agents in parallel (single message, multiple tool calls)
• ✅ Verify every claim with sources
• ✅ Distinguish between [FACT] and [OPINION/ANALYSIS]
• ✅ Include bear case and risk analysis
• ✅ Use citation-validator skill before finalizing
• ✅ Maintain objectivity and neutrality
• ✅ Explicitly acknowledge uncertainties
• ✅ Present balanced bull/bear cases

What You Should NOT Do:

• ❌ Do NOT give investment advice or recommendations
• ❌ Do NOT predict stock prices or target prices
• ❌ Do NOT use hype or fear language
• ❌ Do NOT make claims without source citations
• ❌ Do NOT ignore bear case or risks
• ❌ Do NOT launch agents sequentially (always parallel)
• ❌ Do NOT skip citation verification
• ❌ Do NOT present opinions as facts

Special Considerations by Investment Style

Value Investing

• Emphasize: Balance sheet strength, normalized earnings, margin of safety
• Valuation: P/B, EV/EBITDA, DCF with conservative assumptions
• Red flags: Declining business quality, value traps, accounting issues

Growth Investing

• Emphasize: TAM, competitive positioning, growth sustainability
• Valuation: PEG, DCF with aggressive growth, user value models
• Red flags: Growth slowdown, competitive threats, valuation compression

Turnaround/Distressed

• Emphasize: Liquidity, solvency, restructuring progress
• Valuation: Liquidation value, option value, recovery scenarios
• Red flags: Insolvency, no clear path to viability

Dividend/Income

• Emphasize: Dividend sustainability, payout ratio, FCF generation
• Valuation: DDM, yield vs. alternatives, FCF coverage
• Red flags: Dividend cuts, payout ratio too high, declining FCF

Using Related Skills

This skill works synergistically with:

• stock-question-refiner: Generates the structured research prompt you execute
• citation-validator: Validates citation quality and completeness
• synthesizer: Helps combine multi-agent findings into coherent narratives
• got-controller: Manages complex research using Graph of Thoughts (for especially complex topics)

Examples

For detailed examples of:

• How to deploy agents for each phase
• What phase reports should look like
• How to handle specific scenarios (e.g., distressed companies, high-growth tech)

See examples.md.

For detailed phase-by-phase instructions, see phases.md.