Skip to main content

technical-audit

Technical SEO audit methodology including crawlability, indexability, and Core Web Vitals analysis. Use when auditing pages or sites for technical SEO issues.

Informations de source

Dépôt
MadAppGang/claude-code
Dernière activité de la source
20 janvier 2026 à 08:16
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
284
Forks
25

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
plugin
seo
updated
2026-01-20T00:00:00.000Z
name
technical-audit
description
Technical SEO audit methodology including crawlability, indexability, and Core Web Vitals analysis. Use when auditing pages or sites for technical SEO issues.
plugin: seo updated: 2026-01-20 # Technical Audit ## When to Use - Auditing pages for technical SEO issues - Analyzing Core Web Vitals performance - Checking schema markup implementation - Validating crawlability and indexability ## Audit Categories ### 1. Indexability | Check | Requirement | Severity | |-------|-------------|----------| | Title Tag | Present, 50-60 chars, contains keyword | CRITICAL | | Meta Description | Present, 150-160 chars | HIGH | | Canonical Tag | Present, self-referencing or correct | HIGH | | Robots Meta | No noindex on important pages | CRITICAL | | Robots.txt | Not blocking important content | CRITICAL | ### 2. Content Structure | Check | Requirement | Severity | |-------|-------------|----------| | H1 Tag | Exactly 1, contains keyword | CRITICAL | | Heading Hierarchy | H1 -> H2 -> H3 (no skips) | HIGH | | Word Count | Meets or exceeds competitor benchmark | MEDIUM | | Content Uniqueness | No duplicate content issues | HIGH | ### 3. Core Web Vitals | Metric | Good | Needs Improvement | Poor | |--------|------|-------------------|------| | LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) | <2.5s | 2.5s-4.0s | >4.0s | | INP (Interaction to Next Paint) | <200ms | 200ms-500ms | >500ms | | CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) | <0.1 | 0.1-0.25 | >0.25 | **Measurement Methods:** 1. Chrome DevTools MCP (preferred) 2. PageSpeed Insights API 3. Lighthouse CLI 4. Manual measurement via web.dev ### 4. Schema Markup | Page Type | Recommended Schema | |-----------|-------------------| | Article/Blog | Article, BlogPosting | | FAQ page | FAQPage | | How-to guide | HowTo | | Product page | Product | | Local business | LocalBusiness | | Person/Author | Person | ### 5. Links | Check | Requirement | Severity | |-------|-------------|----------| | Internal Links | Minimum 3 per page | HIGH | | Broken Links | 0 | CRITICAL | | External Links | At least 1 authoritative | LOW | | Orphan Pages | 0 (all pages linked from somewhere) | MEDIUM | ## Audit Process ### Step 1: Fetch Page ```bash # Use WebFetch or curl curl -s "$URL" > page.html ``` ### Step 2: Parse Structure - Extract title, meta description, canonical - Map heading hierarchy - Count words - List all links ### Step 3: Analyze Performance - Use PageSpeed Insights API or Chrome DevTools MCP - Document all Core Web Vitals - Note specific issues (large images, render-blocking JS) ### Step 4: Check Schema - Look for JSON-LD in page source - Validate using Google Rich Results Test - Note missing or incomplete properties ### Step 5: Score and Report - Calculate overall score (0-100) - List all issues by severity - Provide specific fix recommendations ## Output Format ```markdown ## Technical SEO Audit Report **URL**: {url} **Date**: {date} **Overall Score**: {score}/100 ### Core Web Vitals | Metric | Value | Status | |--------|-------|--------| | LCP | {value}s | GOOD/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/POOR | | INP | {value}ms | GOOD/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/POOR | | CLS | {value} | GOOD/NEEDS IMPROVEMENT/POOR | **Measurement Method**: {Chrome DevTools MCP | PageSpeed API | Lighthouse | Manual} ### Issues Found **CRITICAL ({count})**: 1. {issue} - {location} - {fix recommendation} **HIGH ({count})**: 1. {issue} - {location} - {fix recommendation} **MEDIUM ({count})**: 1. {issue} - {location} - {fix recommendation} ### Recommendations 1. {priority fix 1} 2. {priority fix 2} 3. {priority fix 3} ```
Voir sur GitHub