Skip to main content

test-driven-development

RED-GREEN-REFACTOR: write a failing test, watch it fail, make it pass, refactor. Use before writing any production code or bug fix, or on mention of TDD or test-first, even if the user asked only for the implementation.

Informations de source

Dépôt
MadAppGang/magus
Dernière activité de la source
25 septembre 2026 à 00:03
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
11
Forks
4

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
test-driven-development
description
RED-GREEN-REFACTOR: write a failing test, watch it fail, make it pass, refactor. Use before writing any production code or bug fix, or on mention of TDD or test-first, even if the user asked only for the implementation.
user-invocable
false
# Test-Driven Development (TDD) **Iron Law:** "NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST" ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Writing new functions, methods, or classes - Adding features to existing code - Fixing bugs (write test that reproduces bug first) - Refactoring code (tests verify behavior preservation) - Implementing API endpoints or business logic - Creating UI components with testable behavior ## Red Flags (Violation Indicators) Watch for these patterns that indicate TDD violations: - [ ] **Implementation First** - Writing production code before any test exists ("I'll write the function, then add tests") - [ ] **"Tests After" Promise** - Planning to write tests later ("Let me implement this quickly, I'll add tests after") - [ ] **"Same Purpose" Rationalization** - Claiming manual testing is equivalent ("I tested it manually, that's the same thing") - [ ] **Skipping "Simple" Code** - Avoiding tests for "obvious" logic ("This function is too simple to test") - [ ] **Happy Path Only** - Writing tests only for success cases, ignoring errors ("The normal case works, that's enough") - [ ] **No Test for Changes** - Modifying code without adding corresponding test ("Just a small change, doesn't need a test") - [ ] **"Just a Small Fix"** - Bypassing TDD for "quick fixes" ("It's only one line, I don't need a test") **Violation Detection:** If you find yourself saying "I'll test this after I get it working," you're violating TDD. ## RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle TDD follows a strict 3-phase workflow: ### Phase 1: RED (Write a Failing Test) **Objective:** Specify desired behavior through a test that fails **Steps:** 1. **Write the test first** - Before any production code exists 2. **Define expected behavior** - What should the code do? 3. **Use API you wish existed** - Test the interface you want 4. **Run the test** - Verify it fails (if it passes, you didn't test new behavior) 5. **Check failure reason** - Ensure it fails for the right reason (missing code, not syntax error) **Example (TypeScript/Jest):** ```typescript // tests/user-validator.test.ts describe('UserValidator', () => { it('rejects email without @ symbol', () => { const validator = new UserValidator(); const result = validator.validateEmail('invalid-email'); expect(result.isValid).toBe(false); expect(result.error).toBe('Email must contain @ symbol'); }); }); // Run: npm test // Result: FAIL - UserValidator is not defined ✓ (correct failure) ``` **Red Phase Complete When:** Test fails with expected error message --- ### Phase 2: GREEN (Make the Test Pass) **Objective:** Write minimal code to make test pass **Steps:** 1. **Write minimal code** - Just enough to pass the test 2. **Don't optimize yet** - Resist the urge to add "nice-to-have" features 3. **Run the test** - Verify it passes 4. **Commit frequently** - Small, passing test = commit point **Example (TypeScript):** ```typescript // src/user-validator.ts interface ValidationResult { isValid: boolean; error?: string; } export class UserValidator { validateEmail(email: string): ValidationResult { if (!email.includes('@')) { return { isValid: false, error: 'Email must contain @ symbol' }; } return { isValid: true }; } } // Run: npm test // Result: PASS ✓ ``` **Green Phase Complete When:** Test passes consistently --- ### Phase 3: REFACTOR (Improve Design) **Objective:** Improve code quality while keeping tests green **Steps:** 1. **Look for duplication** - Extract repeated code 2. **Improve naming** - Make intent clearer 3. **Simplify logic** - Reduce complexity 4. **Run tests after each change** - Ensure behavior preserved 5. **Commit when satisfied** - Refactored code + passing tests = commit **Example (TypeScript - Refactored):** ```typescript // src/user-validator.ts interface ValidationResult { isValid: boolean; error?: string; } export class UserValidator { private static readonly EMAIL_REQUIRED_CHARS = '@'; private static readonly EMAIL_ERROR = 'Email must contain @ symbol'; validateEmail(email: string): ValidationResult { if (!this.containsRequiredChars(email)) { return this.createError(UserValidator.EMAIL_ERROR); } return this.createSuccess(); } private containsRequiredChars(email: string): boolean { return email.includes(UserValidator.EMAIL_REQUIRED_CHARS); } private createError(message: string): ValidationResult { return { isValid: false, error: message }; } private createSuccess(): ValidationResult { return { isValid: true }; } } // Run: npm test // Result: PASS ✓ (behavior unchanged) ``` **Refactor Phase Complete When:** Code is clean AND tests still pass --- ## Anti-patterns Table | Anti-pattern | ✗ Wrong Approach | ✓ Correct TDD Approach | |--------------|------------------|------------------------| | **Test-After** | Write `calculateTotal()` function, then write tests | Write test for `calculateTotal()`, see it fail, implement function | | **Empty Tests** | Write test that always passes: `expect(true).toBe(true)` | Write test that fails until production code is correct | | **Happy-Path-Only** | Test only valid inputs: `validateEmail('user@example.com')` | Test invalid inputs too: `validateEmail('no-at-sign')`, `validateEmail('')` | | **Skip-Simple** | Skip test for "obvious" `add(a, b) { return a + b }` | Write test: `expect(add(2, 3)).toBe(5)` - bugs hide in "simple" code | | **Change-Then-Test** | Modify `calculateDiscount()`, run app manually, then add test | Write failing test showing bug, modify code until test passes | ## Testing Strategy by Code Type ### Pure Functions **Pattern:** 1 happy path + 3 edge cases minimum **Example (TypeScript):** ```typescript describe('calculateDiscount', () => { it('applies 10% discount to $100 purchase', () => { expect(calculateDiscount(100, 0.1)).toBe(90); }); it('returns 0 for negative amounts', () => { expect(calculateDiscount(-50, 0.1)).toBe(0); }); it('returns original amount for 0 discount', () => { expect(calculateDiscount(100, 0)).toBe(100); }); it('throws error for discount > 1', () => { expect(() => calculateDiscount(100, 1.5)).toThrow('Discount must be <= 1'); }); }); ``` --- ### Error Handlers **Pattern:** 1 test per error type + 1 success case **Example (Python/pytest):** ```python def test_divide_by_zero_raises_error(): with pytest.raises(ZeroDivisionError, match="Cannot divide by zero"): divide(10, 0) def test_divide_non_numeric_raises_error(): with pytest.raises(TypeError, match="Arguments must be numbers"): divide("10", 5) def test_divide_returns_float(): result = divide(10, 3) assert result == pytest.approx(3.333, rel=1e-3) ``` --- ### UI Components **Pattern:** 1 render test + 3 interaction tests **Example (TypeScript/React Testing Library):** ```typescript describe('LoginForm', () => { it('renders email and password inputs', () => { render(<LoginForm />); expect(screen.getByLabelText('Email')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByLabelText('Password')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('shows error for invalid email', async () => { render(<LoginForm />); await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'invalid'); await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Login' })); expect(screen.getByText('Invalid email address')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); it('disables submit button while loading', async () => { render(<LoginForm onSubmit={async () => await delay(1000)} />); const submitButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Login' }); await userEvent.click(submitButton); expect(submitButton).toBeDisabled(); }); it('calls onSubmit with form data', async () => { const onSubmit = jest.fn(); render(<LoginForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />); await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Email'), 'user@example.com'); await userEvent.type(screen.getByLabelText('Password'), 'password123'); await userEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button', { name: 'Login' })); expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ email: 'user@example.com', password: 'password123' }); }); }); ``` --- ### API Endpoints **Pattern:** 1 success test + 2 error tests **Example (Go/testing):** ```go func TestGetUser(t *testing.T) { t.Run("returns user for valid ID", func(t *testing.T) { req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/users/123", nil) w := httptest.NewRecorder() handler := NewUserHandler(mockUserRepo) handler.GetUser(w, req) assert.Equal(t, http.StatusOK, w.Code) assert.Contains(t, w.Body.String(), `"id":"123"`) }) t.Run("returns 404 for non-existent user", func(t *testing.T) { req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/users/999", nil) w := httptest.NewRecorder() handler := NewUserHandler(mockUserRepo) handler.GetUser(w, req) assert.Equal(t, http.StatusNotFound, w.Code) }) t.Run("returns 400 for invalid ID format", func(t *testing.T) { req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/users/invalid", nil) w := httptest.NewRecorder() handler := NewUserHandler(mockUserRepo) handler.GetUser(w, req) assert.Equal(t, http.StatusBadRequest, w.Code) }) } ``` --- ## Examples ### Example 1: Bug Fix with TDD (TypeScript) **Scenario:** User reports: "App crashes when searching with empty query" **Step 1 (RED): Write test that reproduces bug** ```typescript // tests/search.test.ts describe('searchProducts', () => { it('returns empty array for empty query', () => { const result = searchProducts(''); expect(result).toEqual([]); }); }); // Run: npm test // Result: FAIL - TypeError: Cannot read property 'toLowerCase' of undefined ``` **Step 2 (GREEN): Fix the bug** ```typescript // src/search.ts export function searchProducts(query: string): Product[] { if (!query || query.trim() === '') { return []; } return products.filter(p => p.name.toLowerCase().includes(query.toLowerCase())); } // Run: npm test // Result: PASS ✓ ``` **Step 3 (REFACTOR): Add more edge cases** ```typescript describe('searchProducts', () => { it('returns empty array for empty query', () => { expect(searchProducts('')).toEqual([]); }); it('returns empty array for whitespace-only query', () => { expect(searchProducts(' ')).toEqual([]);
Voir sur GitHub
Ce SKILL.md est tres volumineux, SkillsMP affiche donc ici seulement la premiere section. Voir sur GitHub