technology-radar

name	technology-radar
description	Build and maintain technology radars for adoption, trial, assessment, and hold decisions, and choose proportionate architecture-governance paths for technology portfolios. Use when governing technology choices, build-versus-buy decisions, architecture standards, exceptions, or engineering portfolio risk. Do not use for enterprise capability or target-state architecture, writing ADRs, implementing systems, security engineering, or operational incident/runbook work.
license	MIT
compatibility	No runtime dependency.
metadata	{"source_repo":"https://github.com/magnus919/hermes-profiles","source_commit":"867a555"}

Technology Radar

CTO methodology for making technology decisions, governing architecture, measuring engineering effectiveness, managing technical debt, and operating an innovation pipeline. These frameworks help a CTO balance short-term delivery velocity with long-term platform health.

When Not to Use

• Route enterprise capability maps, operating-model design, and current/target-state roadmaps to enterprise-architecture. This skill stays focused on technology portfolio posture and governance mechanics; use software-architecture for system-level target design.
• Route the durable record of one consequential decision to adr-authoring; use this skill to choose the governance path and connect the decision to standards or radar feedback.
• Route system design and code changes to the relevant engineering skill, security requirements and threat modeling to secure-software-engineering, and live operations or SLO work to site-reliability-engineering.

Domain Model

Domain	Covers	Artifact
Technology Radar	Adopt/Trial/Assess/Hold quadrants, tool selection criteria, deprecation policy	Technology radar document
Build vs Buy	TCO analysis, decision matrices, vendor evaluation, integration cost	Build-vs-buy recommendation
Architecture Governance	Automated policy, federated decisions, advice processes, centralized review, standards, exceptions, and feedback	Governance decision record, standard, exception, radar update
Engineering Metrics	DORA (deploy frequency, lead time, MTTR, change failure rate), SPACE, DevEx	Engineering dashboard, health report
Technical Debt	Interest calculation, remediation prioritization, principal estimation	Technical debt register
Innovation Pipeline	Horizon scanning, POC criteria, production readiness gates	Innovation funnel, POC report

When to Load

Load this skill when the task involves:

• Evaluating a new technology or tool for adoption
• Making a build-vs-buy decision with TCO analysis
• Designing or auditing architecture governance processes
• Setting up engineering metrics dashboards (DORA, SPACE)
• Quantifying and prioritizing technical debt remediation
• Running an innovation pipeline with POC-to-production gates
• Deprecating or retiring legacy technology
• Selecting or auditing automated policy, federated decisions, advice processes, or centralized review

Governance Workflow

For architecture or technology-governance work, read references/architecture-governance.md and:

1. Establish the decision, intended outcome, affected systems and teams, evidence available, and the decision owner.
2. Assess reversibility, scope, risk, blast radius, regulatory exposure, and cross-team impact. Record uncertainty instead of converting it into a false score.
3. Select the lightest governance mode that still controls the credible downside: automated policy, federated decision, advice process, or centralized review. Escalate when evidence shows that the decision is less reversible, broader, riskier, or more regulated than first assumed.
4. Define the decision record, implementation checks, exception path, and signals that will cause reconsideration.
5. Feed implementation and operational evidence back into the decision, standards, exceptions, and radar posture. Treat feedback as a reason to learn, not as retroactive blame.

Reference Files

Reference	Load When	File
Technology Radar	You need to evaluate and categorize a technology or tool for adoption, trial, assessment, or hold	references/technology-radar.md
Build vs Buy	You're comparing build vs buy options with TCO analysis and decision criteria	references/build-vs-buy.md
Architecture Governance	You're choosing or auditing proportional governance modes, standards, exceptions, escalation, or feedback	references/architecture-governance.md
Engineering Metrics	You need to measure engineering effectiveness with DORA, SPACE, or DevEx frameworks	references/engineering-metrics.md

Design Principles

1. Technology is a means, not an end. Every technology decision must trace back to a business outcome. "Because it's new" is not a reason to adopt. "Because it solves X faster/safer/cheaper" is.
2. Radar is a living document. A technology radar should be refreshed when evidence, strategy, risk, or usage changes materially. Set a cadence that fits the portfolio, and make significant adoption, hold, promotion, or retirement decisions trigger an update rather than waiting for a calendar event.
3. Build vs buy is never just cost. Total Cost of Ownership includes maintenance, hiring, training, integration, migration, and opportunity cost. A cheaper build today may be vastly more expensive over 3 years.
4. Engineering metrics measure the system, not the people. DORA metrics measure the delivery capability of the org. SPACE measures developer satisfaction. Neither is a performance review tool for individuals.
5. Technical debt has a principal and an interest payment. The principal is the cost to fix it properly. The interest is the recurring drag on velocity. Prioritize debt where interest/principal ratio is highest.
6. Production readiness gates exist to prevent crisis. Every gate that is skipped in the name of speed will be paid for in incident response time later.
7. Governance should follow consequence. Local and reversible decisions should stay local; irreversible, regulated, high-blast-radius, or materially cross-team decisions need stronger coordination or authority.

Portability

This skill is intentionally host-neutral. Use your agent's normal mechanisms to load the references, templates, and scripts listed here. Do not assume a particular profile system, task orchestrator, memory service, or response-handoff format.