| name | gourmet-research |
| description | Use when creating or updating evidence-based gourmet research outputs for cities (restaurants/cafes/desserts) that require multi-source evidence, standardized scoring, and structured city folders. |
Gourmet Research
Overview
Template-first workflow for traceable, comparable, auditable food recommendations across cities. Keep evidence, scores, and decisions synchronized.
Core Rules (Non-Negotiable)
- If the user has not specified an output language, ask once at project start and record it in
overview.md.
- Use gourmet// with 6 files:
overview.md, inbox.md, candidates.md, notes.md, top-places.md, excluded.md.
- Never fabricate sources, ratings, or claims. Use
unknown when missing.
- Prefer original-language place names (not translated) unless the user requests otherwise.
- Preserve audit trail: never delete candidates; mark
rejected and record why in excluded.md.
- Default minimum sources = 4. If the locale is information-sparse, allow 3 only when you record
evidence: limited with the reason and attempted sources.
Template-First Workflow (Summary)
- Initialize: Ask for output language + city, then copy templates from
assets/templates/ into the city folder.
- Normalize: Update language/city placeholders in the copied files before research begins.
- Discovery: Capture raw ideas in
inbox.md, then move top candidates into with .