| name | entity-framework6 |
| description | Maintain or migrate EF6-based applications with realistic guidance on what to keep, what to modernize, and when EF Core is or is not the right next step. USE FOR: EF6 codebases; runtime versus ORM migration decisions; EDMX, code-first, ObjectContext, and legacy data-access review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made. |
| compatibility | Requires EF6 or a transition plan from EF6 to EF Core or modern .NET. |
Entity Framework 6
Trigger On
- working in an EF6 codebase on .NET Framework or modern .NET
- deciding whether to keep EF6, move to modern .NET runtime, or port to EF Core
- reviewing EDMX, code-first, or legacy ASP.NET/WPF/WinForms data access
- planning a data layer migration strategy
Workflow
-
Audit current EF6 usage before planning any migration. Identify which features the codebase depends on:
-
Decide runtime vs ORM migration separately:
| Path | When to use |
|---|
| Keep EF6 on .NET Framework | Legacy app with no runtime pressure |
| EF6 on modern .NET | Runtime upgrade needed, ORM migration too risky |
| EF6 → EF Core | Clean data layer, no EDMX, minimal stored-procedure mapping |
-
For maintenance work — keep EF6 stable:
- use repository + unit of work patterns to isolate data access (see references/patterns.md)
- prefer
DbContext over ObjectContext for new code
- use
AsNoTracking() for read-only queries
- configure concurrency tokens with
[ConcurrencyCheck] or IsRowVersion()
-
For migration work — validate each slice:
- map EF6 features to EF Core equivalents (see references/migration.md)
- migrate one bounded context at a time, not the entire data layer
- run integration tests against the real database provider, not InMemory
- verify:
dotnet ef migrations add succeeds, queries produce equivalent results, lazy loading behavior matches expectations
-
Do not promise EF Core features to EF6 codebases — EF6 is stable and supported but not on the innovation path. Keep expectations realistic.
Current Upstream Notes
- The July 2026 EF Core vs EF6 comparison refresh keeps the ORM migration decision separate from runtime modernization. EF6 can remain the right ORM when EDMX, ObjectContext, or complex legacy mappings dominate the risk.
- EF Core
v10.0.10 servicing does not change EF6 guidance by itself; only move an EF6 codebase when the project has a bounded migration slice and database-backed equivalence tests.
flowchart LR
A["Audit EF6 usage"] --> B{"EDMX or complex mappings?"}
B -->|Yes| C["High migration cost — consider keeping EF6"]
B -->|No| D["Evaluate EF Core migration"]
D --> E["Migrate one context at a time"]
E --> F["Integration test against real DB"]
C --> G["Modernize runtime only"]
F --> H["Validate query equivalence"]
G --> H
Deliver
- realistic EF6 maintenance or migration guidance based on actual codebase audit
- clear separation between runtime upgrade and ORM upgrade work
- bounded migration slices with concrete validation checkpoints
- reduced risk for legacy data access changes
Validate
- EF6 feature inventory is complete before migration planning starts
- migration assumptions are backed by real feature usage, not guesses
- EF6-only features (EDMX, spatial types, ObjectContext patterns) are identified early
- integration tests run against the real database provider, not mocks or InMemory
- the proposed path avoids unnecessary churn in stable data access code
References
- references/migration.md - decision framework, migration approaches, EF6-to-EF Core feature mapping, and common pitfalls
- references/patterns.md - repository and unit of work patterns, query optimization, concurrency handling, auditing, and testing strategies for EF6 codebases