| name | use-arkouda |
| description | Find prior decisions and record new ones in a repo's ADR (Architecture Decision Record) collection using the arkouda CLI. Invoke any time you're about to make a non-trivial design, architecture, library, schema, or convention decision — check what was already decided before deciding, and capture the outcome afterwards. |
| license | MIT |
Using arkouda
In repositories that record decisions as ADRs (Architecture Decision Records — Markdown files with YAML frontmatter, conventionally under docs/adr/), arkouda is the CLI for finding, reading, validating, and scaffolding them. Before you decide, check what's already been decided. After you decide, capture it.
If a repo has no ADR directory yet but the arkouda binary is installed, this skill is also the right one to reach for: arkouda new enforces the schema from the first file.
When to use
Reach for this skill any time you're about to make a non-trivial decision. Concretely:
- Before writing code that picks a library, framework, datastore, encoding, transport, or other "we now depend on X" commitment.
- Before changing a public interface, file layout, schema, naming convention, or directory structure.
- Before refactoring away from a pattern you didn't introduce — you may be about to undo a deliberate decision.
- When the user asks "did we ever decide on X?", "why is it done this way?", or otherwise touches motivation.
- When the user asks for a new ADR or to mark one superseded.
- Whenever you land in an unfamiliar repo with an ADR directory (commonly
docs/adr/, but not always — see below).
A 5-second arkouda list | xargs rg -i <topic> is cheaper than redoing a debate that's already in the file. If a relevant ADR exists, build on it, propose superseding it, or notice you don't need to decide at all.
Philosophy
Two principles shape arkouda's behaviour, and explain why some defaults look minimal:
- Defer to Unix tools. Arkouda earns subcommands only where standard shell tools (
rg, grep, cat, awk, xargs) cannot. Content search, full-file printing, counting, and slicing are left to the shell — the CLI emits structured output you compose with the rest of your toolbox. Hence: no search, no full-file show.
- Decision-centric defaults.
arkouda list prints one ADR path per line (no header, no padding) so it pipes cleanly. The body of an ADR, for arkouda's purposes, is its ## Decision section, so arkouda decision <id> defaults to that section's body — supporting sections (context, consequences, status, custom) are opt-in via --section.
The source rationale lives in arkouda's own repo, in the ADRs defer-to-unix-tools and ls-style-list-and-decision.
Where ADRs live
The location varies between repos. Don't hardcode docs/adr/ in pipelines — ask arkouda. Run arkouda list to get the actual ADR paths for the repo you're in.
Resolution order, in case you need to set or override the location:
--dir <path> flag (one-shot override, single directory).
ADR_DIR=<path> environment variable (session override, single directory).
.arkoudarc.toml at the repo root (or any ancestor of the cwd) with a dirs = [...] list — supports multiple directories, useful for monorepos:
dirs = ["docs/adr", "services/billing/docs/adr"]
Relative paths resolve against the config file's directory. arkouda list, check, and decision aggregate across all listed dirs; arkouda new writes into the first one.
- Default:
docs/adr/.
Filenames are the ADR id with a .md suffix (e.g. use-postgres.md), but the directory varies — let arkouda list tell you.
Commands
Four subcommands, each doing something the shell can't:
arkouda list [--sort id|date|status] [-l] — one ADR path per line. Pipe straight into xargs/rg/cat/wc. With -l, headerless ID STATUS DATE PATH TITLE table for human skimming.
arkouda decision <id> [--section <name>] — body of that ADR's ## Decision section. --section <name> picks any other heading (context, consequences, status, or custom). Errors if the section is missing. For the full file, resolve the path through arkouda list and cat it.
arkouda check — validates frontmatter, filenames, and required Markdown sections across the collection. Exit 0 clean, 1 on any error. Each error carries a code (E000–E010) and a fix hint.
arkouda new "<title>" [--id <slug>] [--status proposed|accepted|superseded|deprecated|rejected] [--abstract "<one-line summary of the decision>"] — scaffold a new ADR with today's date. Default id is a slug from the title. The abstract should summarize what was decided, not just the topic.
Global flags: --dir <path> (also ADR_DIR), -q/--quiet. Run arkouda --help or arkouda <subcommand> --help for the authoritative surface.
There is intentionally no search subcommand and no full-file show — rg/grep and cat already do those.
One-liners
arkouda list is the path source — it's where the ADRs actually are in this repo.
arkouda list -l && arkouda check
arkouda list
arkouda list | xargs rg -i <topic>
arkouda decision use-postgres
arkouda decision use-postgres --section consequences
cat "$(arkouda list | grep -F /use-postgres.md)"
arkouda list -l | awk '$2=="accepted" {print $4}'
arkouda list -l | awk '{print $2}' | sort | uniq -c
arkouda list -l --sort date | tail -10
arkouda list | while read f; do
id=$(basename "$f" .md)
printf '## %s\n\n' "$id"
arkouda decision "$id"
printf '\n'
done
arkouda new "Adopt Tracing" --abstract "Use OpenTelemetry across services."
arkouda check
Workflows
Before deciding — search what's already there:
arkouda list | xargs rg -i <topic>
arkouda list -l | awk '$2=="accepted"'
arkouda decision <id>
After deciding — capture it:
arkouda new "<Title>" --abstract "<one-line summary of what was decided>"
arkouda check
Supersede an existing decision
- Resolve the path:
path=$(arkouda list | grep -F /<old-id>.md).
cat "$path" to see the current frontmatter, then edit: change status: "superseded" and add superseded_by: "<new-id>".
arkouda new "<New Title>" for the replacement.
arkouda check to confirm both files still validate.
ADR shape (what check enforces)
---
id: "use-postgres" # lowercase slug, must match filename stem
title: "Use Postgres"
abstract: "One-line summary of the decision (what was decided)."
status: "proposed" # proposed | accepted | superseded | deprecated | rejected
date: "2026-05-06" # ISO YYYY-MM-DD, must be a real date
deciders: [] # optional
tags: [] # optional
---
# Use Postgres # H1 must equal title
## Status
Proposed
## Context
Why we are deciding this.
## Decision
What we decided.
## Consequences
What follows from the decision.
Required keys: id, title, abstract, status, date. Required body sections (case-insensitive H2): Status, Context, Decision, Consequences — from Michael Nygard's ADR template. Filename stem must equal the frontmatter id.
When check reports errors
Each diagnostic has a code; the hint usually tells you the exact fix.
- E001/E002 missing or empty required field → add the field with a real value.
- E003 invalid status → use one of the five valid values.
- E004 id is not a lowercase slug → letters, digits, single hyphens.
- E005 filename does not match id → rename to
<id>.md.
- E006 invalid date → ISO
YYYY-MM-DD for a real calendar day.
- E007/E008 missing or wrong H1 → first heading must be
# <title>.
- E009 missing required section → add the named
## Section heading.
- E010 duplicate id across files → make ids unique.
What not to do
- Don't make a non-trivial decision without first checking existing ADRs.
- Don't hardcode
docs/adr/ in pipelines — different repos put ADRs elsewhere via .arkoudarc.toml. Use arkouda list to discover the actual paths.
- Don't write or edit ADR files freehand without running
arkouda check afterwards — the schema is strict.
- Don't invent statuses outside the five valid values; downstream tooling depends on them.
- Don't change a published ADR's
id after creation; create a new ADR and mark the old one superseded instead.
- Don't commit ADRs whose
arkouda check fails — CI is likely to enforce it.