Skip to main content

auditing-part11-trails

Generates and verifies 21 CFR Part 11-style audit trails — who/what/when, electronic signatures, and tamper-evidence — for OpenMed pipelines in GxP and clinical-trial (GCP) settings. Use when the user runs OpenMed in a regulated/validated environment and needs an attributable, time-stamped, tamper-evident record of each processing action, electronic-signature manifestations, or computer-system-validation (CSV) evidence. Trigger keywords: 21 CFR Part 11, Part 11, audit trail, electronic signature, e-signature, GxP, GCP, GLP, GMP, CSV, computer system validation, data integrity, ALCOA, tamper-evident, contemporaneous. Pairs adjacent to OpenMed: maps directly onto OpenMed deidentify(audit=True) -> signed AuditReport with .sign(key)/.verify(key), whose repro_hash + HMAC give the tamper-evidence and attribution Part 11 expects. This is a compliance-enablement aid, not a validation certification.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
maziyarpanahi/openmed
Dernière activité de la source
20 juillet 2026 à 09:27
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
5 347
Forks
680

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
auditing-part11-trails
description
Generates and verifies 21 CFR Part 11-style audit trails — who/what/when, electronic signatures, and tamper-evidence — for OpenMed pipelines in GxP and clinical-trial (GCP) settings. Use when the user runs OpenMed in a regulated/validated environment and needs an attributable, time-stamped, tamper-evident record of each processing action, electronic-signature manifestations, or computer-system-validation (CSV) evidence. Trigger keywords: 21 CFR Part 11, Part 11, audit trail, electronic signature, e-signature, GxP, GCP, GLP, GMP, CSV, computer system validation, data integrity, ALCOA, tamper-evident, contemporaneous. Pairs adjacent to OpenMed: maps directly onto OpenMed deidentify(audit=True) -> signed AuditReport with .sign(key)/.verify(key), whose repro_hash + HMAC give the tamper-evidence and attribution Part 11 expects. This is a compliance-enablement aid, not a validation certification.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"project":"OpenMed","category":"compliance-regulatory","pairs":"adjacent","version":"1.0"}
# Auditing 21 CFR Part 11 trails for OpenMed pipelines In FDA-regulated **GxP** work (GCP clinical trials, GLP, GMP) any electronic record used to support a regulatory decision must meet **21 CFR Part 11**: it has to be **attributable** (who), **contemporaneous and time-stamped** (when), describe **what** changed, be **tamper-evident**, and — where a signing event occurs — carry a controlled **electronic signature**. These map onto the **ALCOA+** data-integrity expectations (Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, Accurate, +Complete/Consistent/Enduring/Available). OpenMed's `deidentify(..., audit=True)` already emits a deterministic, **PHI-free `AuditReport`** that you can `.sign()` (HMAC-SHA256) and later `.verify()`. That gives you the *tamper-evidence* and *attribution* primitives; this skill wraps them in the who/when/what/e-signature envelope Part 11 wants. This is a **compliance-enablement aid**. Part 11 compliance also requires validated systems (CSV), SOPs, and access controls that live outside any single library — a QA/validation lead signs off. ## When to use - OpenMed runs inside a validated/GxP environment and each run must leave an attributable, tamper-evident record. - You need to wrap an OpenMed `AuditReport` with **who/when/what** + an **e-signature manifestation** (meaning, signer, timestamp). - You must **verify** a stored trail hasn't been altered, or produce CSV evidence for an inspection. ## How OpenMed's AuditReport maps to Part 11 | Part 11 expectation | 21 CFR cite | OpenMed mechanism | | --- | --- | --- | | Tamper-evident, accurate copies | 11.10(b),(c) | `AuditReport.to_json()` + `repro_hash` over the canonical payload | | Audit trail: what changed, when | 11.10(e) | `AuditReport.spans` (action per identifier), `input_hash`/`deidentified_text_hash`, `openmed_version`, `manifest_hash` | | Operational/authority checks; attribution | 11.10(d),(g) | `AuditSignature.key_id` (signer/key identity) + your envelope's user id | | Signature manifestation (name, date, meaning) | 11.50 | Your envelope fields `signer`, `signed_at`, `meaning` | | Signature/record linking, non-repudiation | 11.70, 11.200 | HMAC-SHA256 over the canonical payload via `.sign()` / `.verify()` | The HMAC binds the signature to *that exact* report content: any later edit to a span, hash, or field changes `repro_hash`, so `.verify()` fails — that is the tamper-evidence. ## Quick start ```python import openmed, json, datetime as dt note = "Subject S-014 (DOB 1962-08-09) reported headache on 2024-05-01." # 1) Produce the deterministic, PHI-free audit record for this processing step. report = openmed.deidentify(note, policy="hipaa_safe_harbor", audit=True) # 2) Sign it with a controlled release key (stored in a vault / HSM, never in code). report.sign(b"<release-hmac-key>", key_id="omv-signer-2026") # 3) Wrap in a Part 11 envelope: who / when / what / signature meaning. trail = { "record": report.to_dict(), # tamper-evident, no PHI "who": "j.smith@sponsor.example", # authenticated user (your IdP) "when": dt.datetime.now(dt.timezone.utc).isoformat(), "what": "PHI de-identification of source narrative (study X, subject S-014)", "signature_manifestation": { # 21 CFR 11.50 "signer_printed_name": "Jane Smith", "meaning": "reviewed and approved", "signed_at": dt.datetime.now(dt.timezone.utc).isoformat(), }, "system": {"openmed_version": report.openmed_version, "manifest_hash": report.manifest_hash}, } with open("part11_trail.json", "w") as fh: json.dump(trail, fh, indent=2, sort_keys=True) # 4) Later — verify integrity (optionally bind to the exact source/output text). ok = report.verify(b"<release-hmac-key>", original_text=note) assert ok, "AUDIT TRAIL TAMPERED OR KEY MISMATCH" ``` ## Workflow 1. **Authenticate the actor** in your own IdP/access system (Part 11 needs unique IDs and operational checks — outside the library). Capture the user id. 2. **Run the processing step with `audit=True`** to get the deterministic record. 3. **Sign** with a controlled release key from a vault/HSM; record `key_id`. Never embed the key in source or the trail. 4. **Build the Part 11 envelope** — who, when (UTC, contemporaneous), what, and the **signature manifestation** (printed name, meaning, timestamp) per 11.50. 5. **Append, never overwrite.** Store trails write-once (WORM / append-only store). The audit trail itself must be protected and retained. 6. **Verify on retrieval** with `.verify(key, original_text=..., deidentified_text=...)` to confirm neither the record nor the bound texts changed. 7. **Retain** per the study/retention schedule; keep keys and any reversible mapping in a separate, access-controlled store. ## Hand-off to / from OpenMed - **Produce the record:** `auditing-deidentification-runs` (`deidentify(audit=True)` → `AuditReport`) is the source of the signed, PHI-free trail this skill envelopes. - **Coverage evidence:** `auditing-safe-harbor-checklist` documents that the 18 identifier categories were handled — useful as a CSV artifact. - **No-PHI logging:** `enforcing-nophi-logging` ensures the surrounding application logs don't leak identifiers into the trail. - **HIPAA overlap:** `checking-hipaa-compliance` — Part 11 audit controls and the HIPAA Security Rule audit-controls standard (164.312(b)) reinforce each other. - OpenMed runs **on-device**, so the record-generating step stays inside your validated boundary. ## Edge cases & gotchas - **Part 11 ≠ one library.** The signed `AuditReport` gives tamper-evidence and attribution, but Part 11 also requires validated systems (CSV), SOPs, training, and access controls you implement around it. Don't claim "Part 11 compliant" from the audit object alone. - **Unsigned = not tamper-evident.** `.sign()` is a deliberate step; `signature` is `None` until called. Empty/None keys are rejected. - **Key management is the crux.** The HMAC is only as trustworthy as the key. Use a vault/HSM, rotate via `key_id`, and never store the key with the trail. - **Contemporaneous timestamps.** Use a synchronized, trusted clock (UTC) at the moment of the action — back-dating breaks ALCOA "Contemporaneous". - **Append-only retention.** A trail you can silently overwrite isn't an audit trail. Use WORM/append-only storage and protect it from the operators it audits. - **No PHI in the envelope.** The `AuditReport` is hash-and-offset only; don't reintroduce identifiers in the `what`/`who` free-text fields. - **HMAC is symmetric.** It proves integrity to holders of the key, not public non-repudiation. If you need third-party non-repudiation, layer an asymmetric signature over `report.to_json()`. ## Standards & references - 21 CFR Part 11 (Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures): https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-11 - FDA guidance — Part 11 Scope and Application: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/part-11-electronic-records-electronic-signatures-scope-and-application - FDA — Electronic Systems, Records, and Signatures in Clinical Investigations (2023): https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/electronic-systems-electronic-records-and-electronic-signatures-clinical-investigations - FDA — Data Integrity and Compliance With Drug CGMP (ALCOA+): https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/data-integrity-and-compliance-drug-cgmp-questions-and-answers-guidance-industry - GAMP 5 (ISPE) — risk-based CSV: https://ispe.org/publications/guidance-documents/gamp-5-guide-2nd-edition - HMAC-SHA256: RFC 2104 / FIPS 198-1. OpenMed source: `openmed/core/audit.py`.
Voir sur GitHub