| name | evolve-agent |
| description | Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.
|
| license | MIT |
| allowed-tools | Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob |
| metadata | {"author":"Philipp Thoss","version":"1.0","domain":"general","complexity":"intermediate","language":"multi","tags":"meta, agent, evolution, maintenance, versioning"} |
Evolve an Existing Agent
Improve, extend, or create an advanced variant of an agent that was originally authored with create-agent. This procedure covers the maintenance side of the agent lifecycle: assessing gaps against best practices, applying targeted improvements to the persona definition, bumping versions, and keeping the registry and cross-references in sync.
When to Use
- An agent's skills list is outdated after new skills were added to the library
- User feedback reveals missing capabilities, unclear purpose, or weak examples
- Tool requirements have changed (new MCP server, tool removed, privilege reduction needed)
- An agent's scope needs sharpening — it overlaps with another agent or is too broad
- An advanced variant is needed alongside the original (e.g.,
r-developer and r-developer-advanced)
- Related agents or teams were added and cross-references in See Also are stale
Inputs
- Required: Path to the existing agent file to evolve (e.g.,
agents/r-developer.md)
- Required: Evolution trigger (feedback, new skills, tool change, scope overlap, team integration, discovered limitations)
- Optional: Target version bump magnitude (patch, minor, major)
- Optional: Whether to create an advanced variant instead of refining in-place (default: refine in-place)
Procedure
Step 1: Assess the Current Agent
Read the existing agent file and evaluate each section against the quality checklist from guides/agent-best-practices.md:
| Section | What to Check | Common Issues |
|---|
| Frontmatter | All required fields present (name, description, tools, model, version, author) | Missing tags, stale version, wrong priority |
| Purpose | Specific problem statement, not generic "helps with X" | Vague or overlapping with another agent |
| Capabilities | Concrete, verifiable capabilities with bold lead-ins | Generic ("handles development"), no grouping |
| Available Skills | Matches frontmatter skills list, all IDs exist in registry | Stale IDs, missing new skills, lists default skills unnecessarily |
| Usage Scenarios | 2-3 realistic scenarios with invocation patterns | Placeholder text, unrealistic examples |
| Examples | Shows user request and agent behavior | Missing or trivial examples |
| Limitations | 3-5 honest constraints | Too few, too vague, or missing entirely |
| See Also | Valid cross-references to agents, guides, teams | Stale links to renamed or removed files |
cat agents/<agent-name>.md
head -20 agents/<agent-name>.md
grep "skills:" -A 20 agents/<agent-name>.md
grep -r "<agent-name>" teams/*.md
Expected: A list of specific gaps, weaknesses, or improvement opportunities organized by section.
On failure: If the agent file does not exist or has no frontmatter, this skill does not apply — use create-agent instead to author it from scratch.
Step 2: Gather Evolution Requirements
Identify and categorize what triggered the evolution:
| Trigger | Example | Typical Scope |
|---|
| User feedback | "Agent missed XSS in review" | Add skill or capability |
| New skills available | Library gained analyze-api-security | Update skills list |
| Tool change | New MCP server available | Add to tools/mcp_servers |
| Scope overlap | Two agents both claim "code review" | Sharpen purpose and limitations |
| Team integration | Agent added to a new team | Update See Also, verify capabilities |
| Model upgrade | Task requires deeper reasoning | Change model field |
| Privilege reduction | Agent has Bash but only reads files | Remove unnecessary tools |
Document the specific changes needed before editing. List each change with its target section:
- Frontmatter: add `new-skill-id` to skills list
- Capabilities: add "API Security Analysis" capability
- Available Skills: add `new-skill-id` with description
- Limitations: remove outdated limitation about missing skill
- See Also: add link to new team that includes this agent
Expected: A concrete list of changes, each mapped to a specific section of the agent file.
On failure: If the changes are unclear, consult the user for clarification before proceeding. Vague evolution goals produce vague improvements.
Step 3: Choose Evolution Scope
Use this decision matrix to determine whether to refine in-place or create a variant:
| Criteria | Refinement (in-place) | Advanced Variant (new agent) |
|---|
| Agent ID | Unchanged | New ID: <agent>-advanced or <agent>-<specialty> |
| File path | Same .md file | New file in agents/ |
| Version bump | Patch or minor | Starts at 1.0.0 |
| Model | May change | Often higher (e.g., sonnet → opus) |
| Registry | Update existing entry | New entry added |
| Original agent | Modified directly | Left intact, gains See Also cross-reference |
Refinement: Choose when updating skills, fixing documentation, sharpening scope, or adjusting tools. The agent keeps its identity.
Variant: Choose when the evolved version would serve a substantially different audience, require a different model, or add capabilities that would make the original too broad. The original stays as-is for simpler use cases.
Expected: A clear decision — refinement or variant — with rationale.
On failure: If unsure, default to refinement. You can always extract a variant later; it is harder to merge one back.
Step 4: Apply Changes to the Agent File
For Refinements
Edit the existing agent file directly:
- Frontmatter: Update
skills, tools, tags, model, priority, mcp_servers as needed
- Purpose/Capabilities: Revise to reflect new scope or added functionality
- Available Skills: Add new skills with descriptions, remove deprecated ones
- Usage Scenarios: Add or revise scenarios to demonstrate new capabilities
- Limitations: Remove constraints that no longer apply, add new honest ones
- See Also: Update cross-references to reflect current agent/team/guide landscape
Follow these editing rules:
- Preserve all existing sections — add content, do not remove sections
- Keep the Available Skills section in sync with the frontmatter
skills list
- Do not add default skills (
meditate, heal) to frontmatter unless they are core to the agent's methodology
- Verify each skill ID exists:
grep "id: skill-name" skills/_registry.yml
For Variants
cp agents/<agent-name>.md agents/<agent-name>-advanced.md
Expected: The agent file (refined or new variant) passes the assessment checklist from Step 1.
On failure: If an edit breaks the document structure, use git diff to review changes and revert partial edits with git checkout -- <file>.
Step 5: Update Version and Metadata
Bump the version field in frontmatter following semantic versioning:
| Change Type | Version Bump | Example |
|---|
| Typo fix, wording clarification | Patch: 1.0.0 → 1.0.1 | Fixed unclear limitation |
| New skills added, capability expanded | Minor: 1.0.0 → 1.1.0 | Added 3 new skills from library |
| Restructured purpose, changed model | Major: 1.0.0 → 2.0.0 | Narrowed scope, upgraded to opus |
Also update:
updated date to the current date
tags if the agent's domain coverage changed
description if the purpose is materially different
priority if the agent's importance relative to others changed
Expected: Frontmatter version and updated reflect the magnitude and date of changes. New variants start at "1.0.0".
On failure: If you forget to bump the version, the next evolution will have no way to distinguish the current state from the previous one. Always bump before committing.
Step 6: Update Registry and Cross-References
For Refinements
Update the existing entry in agents/_registry.yml to match the revised frontmatter:
grep -A 10 "id: <agent-name>" agents/_registry.yml
Update description, tags, tools, and skills fields to match the agent file. No count change is needed.
Update cross-references in other files if the agent's capabilities or name changed:
grep -r "<agent-name>" teams/*.md
grep -r "<agent-name>" guides/*.md
For Variants
Add the new agent to agents/_registry.yml in alphabetical position:
- id: <agent-name>-advanced
path: agents/<agent-name>-advanced.md
description: One-line description of the advanced variant
tags: [domain, specialty, advanced]
priority: normal
tools: [Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob]
skills:
- skill-id-one
- skill-id-two
Then:
- Increment
total_agents at the top of the registry
- Add See Also cross-reference in the original agent pointing to the variant
- Add See Also cross-reference in the variant pointing to the original
- The
.claude/agents/ symlink to agents/ means the variant is automatically discoverable
Expected: Registry entry matches the agent file frontmatter. For variants, total_agents equals the actual number of agent entries.
On failure: Count entries with grep -c "^ - id:" agents/_registry.yml and verify it matches total_agents.
Step 7: Validate the Evolved Agent
Run the full validation checklist:
head -20 agents/<agent-name>.md
for skill in skill-a skill-b; do
grep "id: $skill" skills/_registry.yml
done
ls agents/*.md | grep -v template | wc -l
grep total_agents agents/_registry.yml
git diff
Expected: All checklist items pass. The evolved agent is ready to commit.
On failure: Address each failing item individually. The most common post-evolution issues are stale skill IDs in the Available Skills section and a forgotten updated date.
Validation
Common Pitfalls
- Forgetting to bump version: Without version bumps, there is no way to track what changed or when. Always update
version and updated in frontmatter before committing.
- Skills list drift: The frontmatter
skills array and the ## Available Skills section must stay in sync. Updating one without the other creates confusion for both humans and tooling.
- Listing default skills unnecessarily: Adding
meditate or heal to the frontmatter when they are already inherited from the registry. Only list them if they are core to the agent's methodology (e.g., mystic, alchemist).
- Tool over-provisioning during evolution: Adding
Bash or WebFetch during an evolution "just in case." Every tool addition should be justified by a specific new capability.
- Stale See Also after variant creation: When creating a variant, both the original and the variant need to reference each other. One-directional references leave the graph incomplete.
- Registry entry not updated: After changing an agent's skills, tools, or description, the
agents/_registry.yml entry must be updated to match. Stale registry entries cause discovery and tooling failures.
Related Skills
create-agent — foundation for authoring new agents; evolve-agent assumes this was followed originally
evolve-skill — the parallel procedure for evolving SKILL.md files
commit-changes — commit the evolved agent with a descriptive message