Skip to main content

skill-reviewer

Review skill PRs with structured severity-rated feedback covering token budgets, routing conflicts, and repo conventions. WHEN: "review skill", "review skill PR", "review skill changes", "check skill quality", "skill PR feedback".

Informations de source

Dépôt
microsoft/GitHub-Copilot-for-Azure
Dernière activité de la source
22 septembre 2026 à 16:28
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
255
Forks
208

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
5 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
skill-reviewer
description
Review skill PRs with structured severity-rated feedback covering token budgets, routing conflicts, and repo conventions. WHEN: "review skill", "review skill PR", "review skill changes", "check skill quality", "skill PR feedback".
license
MIT
metadata
{"author":"Microsoft","version":"1.0.3"}
# Skill PR Reviewer Performs thorough, structured code reviews of skill PRs — severity-classified findings with actionable fixes, positive acknowledgment, and a summary table. ## When to Use - Reviewing a PR that adds or modifies a skill under `plugins/{plugin}/skills/` or `.github/skills/` - Checking skill compliance before submitting a PR - Auditing an existing skill for quality issues > 💡 **Note:** `.github/skills/` meta-skills have different conventions — checklist sections 8-9 apply only to `plugins/{plugin}/skills/` service skills. ## Review Workflow 1. **Collect** — Identify all changed skill files (SKILL.md, references, tests, scripts) 2. **Check** — Run each category from the [review checklist](references/review-checklist.md) 3. **Classify** — Assign severity per the [severity guide](references/severity-classification.md) 4. **Analyze Routing** — Check triggers for conflicts per [routing analysis](references/routing-analysis.md) 5. **Draft** — Write the review per the [output format](references/output-format.md) 6. **Validate** — Verify suggested fixes are actionable with accurate file/line references ## Error Handling | Error | Remediation | |-------|-------------| | Cannot determine changed files | Ask user for the file list or PR number | | Token counting unavailable | Estimate at ~4 chars per token | ## References - [Review Checklist](references/review-checklist.md) - [Severity Classification](references/severity-classification.md) - [Routing Analysis](references/routing-analysis.md) - [Output Format](references/output-format.md)
Voir sur GitHub