Skip to main content

creative-check

Generic quality checking engine for creative works (novel, screenplay, game narrative)

Informations de source

Dépôt
miles990/creative-toolkit
Dernière activité de la source
7 février 2026 à 16:06
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
0
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
schema
1.0
name
creative-check
version
1.0.0
description
Generic quality checking engine for creative works (novel, screenplay, game narrative)
domain
creative
triggers
{"keywords":{"primary":["creative-check","quality-check","qa-check"],"secondary":["consistency","logic","style","pacing"]},"context_boost":["quality","check","review","qa"],"context_penalty":["code","api","database"],"priority":"high"}
dependencies
{"software-skills":[]}
author
ai-novel-system
# Creative Quality Check Skill ## Overview This Skill provides multi-dimensional quality checking for creative works. It loads domain-specific rules and adapts to different creative formats (novel, screenplay, game narrative, etc.). ## Core Functionality 1. Domain-aware quality checking 2. Multi-dimensional evaluation 3. Detailed quality reports 4. Auto-fix suggestions 5. Status tracking --- ## Prerequisites (Domain Loading) 1. Read `.creative/config.yaml` to get the `domain` value 2. If config doesn't exist, prompt user to run `/creative-init` 3. Calculate PLUGIN_ROOT from Skill header's `Base directory` - PLUGIN_ROOT = Base directory minus `/skills/creative-check` suffix 4. Set DOMAIN_DIR = $PLUGIN_ROOT/shared/domains/{domain}/ 5. Read $DOMAIN_DIR/domain.yaml to get quality dimensions and path mappings 6. Read $DOMAIN_DIR/check-guide.md to get domain-specific checking rules 7. Follow the workflow below using loaded rules --- ## Workflow ### Stage 0: Initialization ```markdown 1. Parse target - Single item: `creative-check chapter-005` - Range: `creative-check chapter-001 chapter-010` - Latest: `creative-check` (check most recently completed item) 2. Determine content paths - Read domain.yaml → content.paths.drafts - Build target file path based on domain conventions - Example: drafts/chapter-NNN/chapter-NNN-final.md 3. Load knowledge base - Read domain.yaml → content.paths.knowledge - Load character/world/plot/style files - Build context for checking 4. Load context - Read previous/next content for continuity checks - Read outlines for comparison - Build full checking context ``` ### Stage 1: Multi-Dimensional Checking For each dimension defined in domain.yaml → quality.dimensions: ```markdown 1. Extract dimension configuration - name: Dimension name - weight: Score weight (e.g., 30 points) - checks: List of check items 2. Execute checks - Follow domain-specific rules from check-guide.md - Apply severity levels: critical, warning, suggestion - Collect issues with locations and details 3. Calculate dimension score - Base score = weight - Deduct for each issue: - Critical: -10 points (or per domain rules) - Warning: -3 points - Suggestion: -0 points (logged but not deducted) ``` ### Stage 2: Score Calculation ```markdown 1. Sum all dimension scores 2. Calculate total: sum(dimension_scores) 3. Determine rating: - 80-100: Excellent (ready for publication) - 60-79: Good (minor adjustments suggested) - <60: Needs revision (significant issues) ``` ### Stage 3: Report Generation Generate report at path specified in domain.yaml → content.paths.qa: ```markdown # Quality Report: [Item Title] Generated: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS --- ## Overall Score: XX/100 [For each dimension from domain.yaml] - [Dimension Name]: XX/[Weight] **Rating:** - [ ] Excellent (80-100): Ready for publication - [ ] Good (60-79): Minor adjustments suggested - [ ] Needs Revision (<60): Significant issues found --- ## Passed Checks [List of checks that passed, grouped by dimension] --- ## Critical Issues (Must Fix) ### [Dimension] Issue Description **Location:** Paragraph X / Line Y **Problem:** "Quote original text" **Reason:** Explain why this is a problem **Suggested Fix:** Provide specific revision guidance --- ## Warnings (Suggested Fixes) ### [Dimension] Issue Description **Location:** Paragraph X **Problem:** Brief description **Suggestion:** Revision guidance --- ## Suggestions (Improvements) ### [Dimension] Improvement Idea **Location:** Paragraph X **Current:** Current state **Suggestion:** Better approach or direction --- ## Statistics [Domain-specific statistics from check-guide.md] - Total word count: X,XXX - [Additional metrics per domain] --- ## Next Steps 1. [ ] Fix critical issues (required) 2. [ ] Address warnings (recommended) 3. [ ] Consider suggestions (optional) 4. [ ] Re-run `creative-check` to verify fixes ``` ### Stage 4: Auto-Fix (Optional) ```markdown 1. Identify auto-fixable issues - Read auto-fix rules from check-guide.md - Collect fixable items with proposed changes 2. Ask user for confirmation "Found X auto-fixable issues. Execute auto-fix? (y/n)" 3. If user agrees: - Backup original file: [original-path].backup.md - Apply fixes - Generate fix report: [qa-path]/[item]-fixes.md - Re-run check and generate new report 4. If user declines: - List fixable issues in report - User can manually address them ``` ### Stage 5: Status Update Update `.creative/status.json`: ```json { "items": { "[item-id]": { "status": "qa_completed", "qa_score": 85, "qa_report": "[path-to-report]", "qa_date": "YYYY-MM-DD", "issues": { "critical": 0, "warning": 2, "suggestion": 5 } } } } ``` --- ## Output Format ``` Quality check completed for [item] Overall Score: 78/100 (Good) [For each dimension] - [Dimension]: XX/YY [Status indicator] Critical issues: 0 Warnings: 3 Suggestions: 2 Detailed report: [absolute-path-to-report] Recommended actions: 1. Review warnings and consider revisions 2. Re-run check after making changes Execute auto-fix for fixable issues? (y/n) ``` --- ## Usage Examples ### Example 1: Check Single Item ``` User: /creative-check chapter-005 Assistant: 1. Load domain configuration 2. Read chapter content 3. Execute checks based on domain rules 4. Generate quality report 5. Output summary ``` ### Example 2: Check Range ``` User: /creative-check chapter-001 chapter-010 Assistant: 1. Batch check chapters 1-10 2. Generate individual and summary reports 3. Summary report: qa/reports/batch-001-010-summary.md ``` ### Example 3: Check Latest ``` User: /creative-check Assistant: 1. Read .creative/status.json to find latest completed item 2. Execute check 3. Generate report ``` --- ## Important Notes 1. **Domain-Agnostic Framework**: This Skill does not hardcode any domain-specific logic. All checks are defined in check-guide.md. 2. **Flexible Dimensions**: Quality dimensions are loaded from domain.yaml, allowing different domains to define their own evaluation criteria. 3. **Respect Creative Freedom**: Suggestions should be guidance, not commands. Only critical errors require fixes. 4. **Context-Aware**: Always consider the full context of the work, not just isolated sections. 5. **Style-Adaptive**: Different creative formats have different conventions. Use domain rules to adapt. --- ## Path Configuration All paths are read from domain.yaml: - Content files: content.paths.drafts - Quality reports: content.paths.qa - Status file: .creative/status.json - Knowledge base: content.paths.knowledge All paths should be handled as absolute paths.
Voir sur GitHub