security-audit-rlm

name	security-audit-rlm
description	Run and troubleshoot privacy-preserving, local DSPy RLM security audits for large legacy .NET codebases. Use when asked to scan repositories for vulnerabilities, tune RLM/tool limits, fix truncation/stall issues, or produce actionable markdown/json audit outputs without loading entire codebases into model context.

Security Audit RLM

Use this skill to operate audit.py as a tool-driven RLM workflow for large repositories.

Repository: https://github.com/mitkox/megacode

Execute

1. Verify prerequisites:
   • deno --version
   • model endpoint is reachable (default http://localhost:8000/v1)
2. Run a baseline audit:
   • AUDIT_VERBOSE=1 python audit.py --source-root <repo-path>
3. Confirm outputs:
   • security_audit_report.md
   • security_audit_metadata.json
   • security_audit_manifest.jsonl

Tune For Large Legacy Repos

• Lower planner churn:
  • --max-iterations 8..12
  • --rlm-max-llm-calls 60..100
• Bound REPL noise:
  • --rlm-max-output-chars 15000..30000
• Bound tool payloads:
  • --tool-max-lines 200..400
  • --tool-max-chars 20000..40000
  • --search-max-files 800..2000
  • --search-max-matches 200..600
• Control runtime:
  • --timeout-seconds 600..1800
  • --retries 1..2

Operating Rules

• Keep analysis local when privacy constraints require it.
• Use RLM tool access, not full-context repository injection.
• Keep intermediate output concise and deterministic.
• Prioritize high-severity findings with file/line evidence and concrete fixes.

Troubleshooting

• If run appears stalled:
  • enable verbose mode
  • reduce --max-iterations
  • reduce --rlm-max-output-chars
• If model truncates:
  • raise --lm-max-tokens if backend supports it
  • reduce tool output and iteration count
• If path/file access errors appear in RLM steps:
  • ensure tool-only repository access is used by the audit flow
  • re-run after confirming current audit.py includes list_manifest/read_file/search_pattern tools

Deliverable Format

Ensure report sections remain:

1. Executive Summary
2. Critical Findings (CRITICAL/HIGH)
3. Other Findings (MEDIUM/LOW)
4. Remediation