| name | apprentice-first-week |
| description | Plan an apprentice's or new laborer's first week so they're useful by Friday and safe from hour one — day-by-day teaching order, the safety non-negotiables stated before anything else, what they're allowed to touch unsupervised, and the check-out conversation that decides week two. Use when a tradesperson says 'my apprentice starts Monday', 'how do I train the new guy', or 'the apprentice is useless and I don't have time to teach'. Produces a first-week plan, a can/can't-touch list, and the Friday review script. |
| homepage | https://mohitagw15856.github.io/pm-claude-skills/skill/apprentice-first-week.html |
| metadata | {"openclaw":{"emoji":"🧠"}} |
Apprentice First Week Skill
"Watch me and you'll pick it up" is how apprentices stay useless for a year —
and how thumbs get lost in week one. A first week that works is planned like a
job: safety rules stated as absolutes before any tool moves, one teachable
task-block per day with the why attached, an explicit list of what they may
do unsupervised (short) versus with eyes on them (everything else), and a
Friday conversation that tells both sides the truth. The payoff is selfish and
immediate: an apprentice who can safely prep, fetch, and finish doubles a
one-person business by Friday afternoon.
What This Skill Produces
- A day-by-day first week: one skill-block per day (demonstrate → assist
→ attempt supervised), plus the standing jobs that make them useful between
lessons
- The safety brief, written to be said aloud on Monday at 7:55: the
non-negotiables, what to do when unsure, and the "stop means stop" rule
- The touch list: may-do-unsupervised / may-do-watched / not-yet — updated
Friday
- The Friday review script: what went well, what to fix, one goal for
week two — both directions (the apprentice reviews the teaching too)
Required Inputs
Ask for (if not already provided):
- The trade, and the actual jobs booked for that week (the plan teaches from
real work, not exercises)
- The apprentice: age, experience (school-leaver? career-changer?), formal
scheme requirements if enrolled (college days, logbooks — flag, don't
invent scheme rules)
- The user's honest pain: what they most need taken off their hands
- Site realities: one-van solo work vs a site with other trades
Framework
- Monday is safety and setup, taught as identity. The brief: PPE
always · the tools they must not touch yet, by name · "if unsure, stop
and ask — asking is the job" · where the first-aid kit and shutoffs are ·
the one-sentence rule: nothing we do today is worth a finger. Then teach
the setup/protection/cleanup routine — it's the frame of every day and
they can own it by Wednesday.
- One block per day, taught in three passes. Demonstrate (they watch,
you narrate the why) → assist (they do the low-risk half) → attempt (they
do it watched, you resist grabbing the tool back — the hardest part of
teaching). Pick blocks from the week's real jobs, easiest-reversible
first.
- Standing jobs make the dead time useful. Between lessons: material
prep, protection, tidy-as-you-go, van stock check, watching-with-
questions. An apprentice never stands empty-handed wondering; the list is
on paper.
- The touch list is the contract. Short unsupervised list that grows
every Friday — visible progress is the retention tool for young workers.
Growth is earned by demonstrated care, not by days served.
- Friday review, both directions. Three questions each way: what did
you do this week you couldn't Monday? · what did I explain badly? · one
goal for next week. Ten minutes, and it's the difference between an
apprentice and a decade of laborers who quit in month two.
Output Format
## Monday 7:55 safety brief (say this aloud)
[The non-negotiables, in speakable lines]
## The week
| Day | Skill block (demo → assist → attempt) | From which real job | Standing jobs |
## Touch list v1 (revisit Friday)
Unsupervised: … · Watched: … · Not yet (and why): …
## Friday review script
[Three questions each direction · week-two goal · touch-list updates]
## Scheme admin flags
[College days, logbook, ratios — verify with the scheme, not asserted here]
Quality Checks
Anti-Patterns
Related
[[onboarding-plan]] — the office cousin; [[teach-the-game]] shares the
demonstrate-then-play bones; [[sop-writer]] when a routine deserves writing
down for every future hire.