Skip to main content

student-feedback

Write constructive, specific feedback on student work that motivates and tells the student exactly how to improve. Use when asked to give feedback on a student's work, write grading comments, respond to an essay or assignment, or coach a learner. Produces feedback that names concrete strengths, prioritises the few changes that matter most, and gives an actionable next step — warm in tone, growth-oriented, never just a grade.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills
Dernière activité de la source
21 juin 2026 à 11:04
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
1 320
Forks
232

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
student-feedback
description
Write constructive, specific feedback on student work that motivates and tells the student exactly how to improve. Use when asked to give feedback on a student's work, write grading comments, respond to an essay or assignment, or coach a learner. Produces feedback that names concrete strengths, prioritises the few changes that matter most, and gives an actionable next step — warm in tone, growth-oriented, never just a grade.
# Student Feedback Skill Feedback changes learning only when it's specific, prioritised, and actionable. This skill writes comments that tell a student what worked, the one or two things to fix next, and exactly how — in a tone that keeps them motivated. ## Working from a brief Given the work (or a description of it) and the level, **write the full feedback anyway**. If the actual work isn't pasted, give a strong model of well-structured feedback and note it should be grounded in the specific submission. No empty "[comment]" placeholders. ## Required Inputs Ask for (if not already provided): - **The student work** (or a description) and the **assignment / objective** it's graded against - **Grade or level** and **tone** (encouraging for a struggling student; more rigorous for advanced) - **Rubric or criteria** if one exists - **Purpose** (a grade with comments, a draft for revision, formative coaching) ## Output Format ### Glow — what's working (be specific) 2–3 concrete strengths tied to the work ("your thesis in paragraph 1 is arguable and clear"), not "good job." ### Grow — the priority fixes The **1–3 highest-leverage** changes, in order. For each: what to change, *why it matters*, and a concrete example or model of the better version. Don't list every error — prioritise. ### Your next step One specific, doable action for the next draft or assignment ("in your next essay, start each paragraph with a claim, then evidence"). ### Optional: a sentence of encouragement Genuine, growth-oriented ("you're close — tightening your evidence will lift this a whole level"), not empty praise. If a rubric was given, map the feedback to its criteria. ## Quality Checks - [ ] Strengths and fixes are specific to the actual work, not generic - [ ] Prioritises the few changes that matter — doesn't drown the student in every error - [ ] Each "grow" point says *why* and shows *how* - [ ] Ends with one clear, actionable next step - [ ] Tone is honest and motivating, matched to the student ## Anti-Patterns - "Good job!" / "Needs work" with nothing concrete - Marking every single error so the student can't see what matters - Criticism with no model of the better version - A tone that discourages instead of pointing forward
Voir sur GitHub