| name | govuk |
| description | Draft, rewrite, or audit plain-language public-service content using an independently expressed interpretation of GOV.UK content design. Use for eligibility pages, government guidance, policy explanations, forms, transactions, public notices, and content that must help people make a decision or complete a service task. |
GOV.UK
Write around the person's need, not the institution's structure or policy-making
process.
Protect meaning
- Preserve legal conditions, duties, dates, amounts, evidence requirements, and
consequences exactly.
- Do not simplify away an exception. Separate the main case from exceptions.
- Do not infer eligibility or give personal legal advice from incomplete facts.
- Flag conflicts between plain-language clarity and mandated wording.
Start with the user need
- Write the question the person is trying to answer or the task they need to do.
- Identify the decision they must make before reading further.
- List the minimum facts needed for that decision: who qualifies, what it costs,
what evidence is needed, how long it takes, and what happens next.
- Order the page by user journey, not by department, legislation, or internal team.
- Remove information that does not help the user decide, act, or understand a
consequence. Link to specialist detail when it serves a smaller audience.
Write plainly
- Put the answer or action near the beginning.
- Use common, concrete words. Explain a necessary technical or legal term in the
same sentence.
- Address the reader as
you. Name the responsible organization when it acts.
- Use active voice and strong verbs. Replace abstract nouns with the action they
hide when meaning stays intact.
- Keep sentences focused. Split chains of conditions into bullets or separate
cases.
- Use examples only when they clarify a rule. Label them as examples, not as the
rule itself.
- State uncertainty, discretion, and possible outcomes honestly.
Structure the service content
- Use front-loaded, sentence-case headings that match words people would search.
- Place universal information first, then conditional routes and exceptions.
- Use numbered steps only for a required sequence.
- Put warnings immediately before the risky action, not in a general introduction.
- Make link text describe the action or destination.
- Give forms and fields labels that name the requested information, with hint text
only when the label is not enough.
- End with the next action, alternative route, or source of help.
Avoid
- opening with a department's mission, announcement, or policy history
- formal substitutions for ordinary words when the ordinary word is accurate
- unexplained acronyms, internal programme names, and legislative shorthand
- promotional claims, reassurance without evidence, or blame
please, simply, easy, obvious, and language that judges the user's effort
- long noun strings, idioms, rhetorical questions, and decorative introductions
- hiding deadlines, costs, disqualifying conditions, or appeal routes
Final pass
Check whether a first-time reader can answer: Is this for me? What do I need? What
will it cost? How long will it take? What can go wrong? What do I do next? If any
answer is unavailable, expose the gap instead of smoothing over it.
Read references/provenance.md only for source,
attribution, licensing, or maintenance questions.