newegg-pc-compatibility-checker

name	newegg-pc-compatibility-checker
description	Verify whether a set of specific PC hardware items are compatible with each other using Newegg's real PC Builder compatibility engine. Use when the user has parts in mind (model names or Newegg item numbers) and asks whether they work together — "do these work together", "will this GPU work with my PSU", "can this RAM go on this motherboard", "is this build compatible", "这些硬件兼容吗", "这个显卡能配我的电源吗", "我想升级显卡，原来的电源够不够". Trigger when the user names two or more specific hardware items and wants a verdict. Do NOT use for from-scratch build recommendations where the user has not picked specific parts.
allowed-tools	bash

PC Compatibility Checker

Verify hardware compatibility via Newegg's MCP endpoints over HTTP using standard JSON-RPC. Use the bash tool to call the endpoints — no MCP client registration required.

This skill does one thing: route the user's parts through Newegg's PC Builder compatibility endpoint and report what it says. It does not recommend new builds from scratch — that is outside scope.

Agent Execution Rules

• Reply in the user's language. Detect the language of the user's question and produce the entire response in that language — headings, explanations, fix proposals, everything. Chinese question → Chinese reply. English question → English reply. Japanese question → Japanese reply. Do not mix unless the user mixes first. The only exception is that raw data (item numbers, model names, the original English reasonTraces string in parentheses) stays as-is.
• Do not guess compatibility from your own hardware knowledge. That is the exact failure mode this skill exists to prevent.
• Do not ask for clarification when the user already gave you the parts. Infer item numbers / names from their message and call immediately.
• Use the bash tool to run the curl commands below.
• On curl failure or invalid JSON, report the error directly. Do not fall back to your own knowledge to produce a verdict.

Endpoints

Purpose	Endpoint
Compatibility check	https://apis.newegg.com/ex-mcp/endpoint/ext-pc-builder
Product search	https://apis.newegg.com/ex-mcp/endpoint/product-search

product-search is only needed when the user gives you a model name without an item number — it resolves name → ItemNumber. When the user already gave item numbers, go straight to pc-builder.

The flow

Step 1 — Get every part as an item number

Look at what the user provided:

• They gave item numbers (e.g. 19-113-938) → use them directly and skip straight to Step 2. No lookup needed. Always use the short hyphenated format (19-113-938), never the long URL form (N82E16819113938).
• They gave model names (e.g. "Ryzen 9 9950X3D" + "ASUS B760M-AYW WIFI D4") → call product-search once per part (in parallel) to resolve each name into an ItemNumber.
• Mixed → only search for the parts that do not already have item numbers.

product-search returns ItemNumber directly in the short-hyphenated format — that is everything you need to hand to pc-builder. Do not call any other endpoint for the name → item-number step.

If a search returns multiple candidates, pick the one whose WebDescription most closely matches the user's wording. Only ask the user to disambiguate when it is truly ambiguous (e.g. "DDR4 or DDR5 version of this kit?"). Do not ask three clarifying questions when one will do.

If product-search returns total: 0 for a part, do NOT silently substitute a similar part and proceed. The correct action is:

1. Tell the user plainly that the part was not found in Newegg's catalog (likely out of stock or not carried). Name the specific part the user asked for.
2. Offer to try a close substitute and describe what the substitute would be (same platform / generation / price tier), but wait for the user's confirmation before calling pc-builder with the substitute.
3. If the user declines the substitute, stop. Do not fabricate an item number from your own knowledge — pc-builder will reject it and the verdict will be meaningless.

Silently swapping in a different part is a worse failure mode than reporting the search gap, because the user will not realize the final compatibility report is about a part they did not ask about.

Step 2 — Call pc-builder once with every item

Call comboCompatibleAll with a space-separated list of short-hyphenated item numbers in a single itemNumber string. Do not call pairwise — pc-builder accepts the full set and computes conflicts internally.

curl -sS -X POST "https://apis.newegg.com/ex-mcp/endpoint/ext-pc-builder" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "jsonrpc": "2.0",
    "id": 1,
    "method": "tools/call",
    "params": {
      "name": "comboCompatibleAll",
      "arguments": {
        "businessId": 2,
        "itemNumber": "<ITEM1> <ITEM2> <ITEM3>"
      }
    }
  }'

• businessId is always 2 (fixed).
• itemNumber is a space-separated string of short-hyphenated item numbers — e.g. "19-113-938 13-144-674".

If the call returns a tool-not-found error, first run tools/list to discover the correct tool name:

curl -sS -X POST "https://apis.newegg.com/ex-mcp/endpoint/ext-pc-builder" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":0,"method":"tools/list"}'

pc-builder response shape

Parse the path:

response → result.content[0].text → (parse as JSON) → verdict

Fields on the verdict object:

Field	Description
isCompatible	true → all parts compatible. false → at least one conflict
incompatibleItems[]	Present only when isCompatible: false. One entry per conflicting pair
incompatibleItems[].itemNumber	One side of the conflict
incompatibleItems[].relatedItemNumber	The other side of the conflict
incompatibleItems[].reason	Single summary line of the conflict
incompatibleItems[].uncompatibleInfo	Usually duplicates reason
incompatibleItems[].reasonTraces[]	Array of every specific rule that failed. Always read this, not just reason

Step 3 — Report the verdict honestly

If isCompatible: true: Say so plainly, list what was checked, and stop. Do not invent caveats from your own knowledge.

Exception — PSU wattage disclosure. pc-builder's rules cover sockets, chipsets, memory type, physical fit, and electrical interfaces — but they do not validate that a PSU's wattage meets the GPU manufacturer's recommended minimum. So a 750W PSU paired with an RTX 5090 will return isCompatible: true even though Nvidia recommends 1000W.

Whenever a PSU is among the checked items AND isCompatible: true, append one neutral line to the report:

⚠️ pc-builder does not verify PSU recommended wattage against the GPU's requirements. Please cross-check your PSU against your GPU manufacturer's official wattage recommendation before assembling.

This is not "adding a caveat from your own knowledge" — it is a known, documented limitation of the MCP, and the user needs to know the compatibility engine's scope.

If isCompatible: false: Walk through incompatibleItems[] one entry at a time. For each entry:

1. Refer to the two conflicting items using whatever the user gave you in their original question:
   • User gave model names → use those names (e.g. "Ryzen 9 9950X3D ↔ ASUS B760M-AYW").
   • User gave bare item numbers → use the item numbers (e.g. "19-113-938 ↔ 13-144-674").
   • User gave a mix → use names where they gave names, item numbers where they gave item numbers. Do not do a lookup just to pretty-print.
2. List every entry in reasonTraces — not just reason. Each trace is a separate failed rule and the user deserves to see all of them.
3. Translate each reasonTrace into the user's language (per the top-level "Reply in the user's language" rule), with the original English string in parentheses for reference. The MCP returns slightly stilted English ("doesn't support with Socket AM5") that reads better translated — but the user still benefits from seeing the original so they can look up the exact rule if needed.

Step 4 — Suggest a fix and re-verify

After explaining the conflict, propose a concrete fix:

• Socket / chipset / DDR-generation mismatch → swap the smaller/cheaper side (usually the motherboard or RAM, not the CPU).
• PSU undersized vs GPU → suggest a specific replacement PSU.
• Physical fit (case clearance, cooler height) → swap a part of the same category.

Use product-search to find the replacement part, then call pc-builder again with the updated item list to verify. Do not declare the fix valid from your own reasoning — re-run pc-builder. Iterate until isCompatible: true or the user changes scope.

Response format

Use this structure when reporting the verdict to the user:

Compatible:

## Compatibility check: ✅ Compatible

Checked:
- <user's name for item 1> (<item number>)
- <user's name for item 2> (<item number>)
- ...

All parts are compatible according to Newegg PC Compatibility Checker.

Incompatible:

## Compatibility check: ❌ Incompatible

**Conflict 1: <name1> ↔ <name2>**
- <reasonTraces[0]>
- <reasonTraces[1]>
- ...

**Conflict 2: ...**

### Suggested fix
<specific replacement part with item number>

### Re-verification
[call pc-builder again → report new isCompatible]

All headings, labels, and explanations in the response template above must be translated into the user's language. The English text shown in the template is a structural placeholder — do not ship English section headers (## Compatibility check, ### Suggested fix, etc.) to a non-English-speaking user.

Hard rules

• Item numbers go to pc-builder in short hyphenated format (19-113-938), not the long form (N82E16819113938).
• Never claim compatibility without an isCompatible: true from pc-builder. No verdicts derived from your own knowledge. Ever.
• Never claim incompatibility without an isCompatible: false from pc-builder. Even for "obvious" cases (AMD CPU + Intel motherboard), still call pc-builder so the user sees the authoritative verdict and the specific reasons.
• Read reasonTraces, not just reason — the array has more detail than the summary string.
• Reuse whatever the user gave you when reporting conflicts — names if they gave names, item numbers if they gave item numbers. Do not run extra lookups to pretty-print.
• Re-verify after any fix by calling pc-builder again with the updated set.

Out of scope

• Building a new PC from scratch when the user has not picked specific parts. Tell them this skill is for verifying parts they already have in mind, and answer their build-recommendation question normally without this skill.
• Recommending parts based on price / performance opinions when the user only asked about compatibility. Stay focused on the compatibility question.
• Inventing compatibility rules pc-builder did not return. If the MCP says valid, do not add fake caveats; if invalid, do not expand on reasons it did not give.

Common pitfalls

• Doing extra lookups to translate item numbers into names when the user already gave you item numbers and will recognize them. Wasteful and slow — just report what the user gave you.
• Translating only reason and ignoring reasonTraces — the user loses information about every failed rule.
• Using the long-form item number (N82E16819113938). pc-builder expects the short form.
• Skipping pc-builder for "obvious" cases like AMD CPU + Intel motherboard. The whole point of the skill is that the verdict comes from the MCP, not from you.
• Suggesting a fix without re-verifying — every proposed swap must go through pc-builder again before being presented as a solution.
• Silently substituting a part when product-search returns 0 results. If Newegg does not have the exact part the user asked about, you must tell the user and ask — not quietly proceed with a similar part. The final verdict must always be about the parts the user actually asked about.
• Omitting the PSU wattage disclaimer when reporting an isCompatible: true build that includes a PSU. pc-builder does not check that the PSU is big enough for the GPU; tell the user that explicitly instead of letting them assume the green check covers it.

Edge cases

• HTTP error or curl failure: Report status code and body. Do not retry silently and do not fall back to your own compatibility knowledge.
• result.error in response: Display error.message to the user.
• incompatibleItems empty but isCompatible: false: Treat as an upstream bug — tell the user the service returned an inconsistent response and ask them to retry.
• incompatibleItems pairs the same itemNumber with multiple relatedItemNumbers: Report each pair separately; do not collapse them.