Skip to main content

rail-lidar-qa-mvp

Rail LiDAR QA MVP - Local LiDAR quality validation for railway infrastructure using drone simulation, point cloud metrics, and 3D visualization.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
Ntizar/NtizarBrainMasterMind
Dernière activité de la source
26 juin 2026 à 12:05
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
2
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
rail-lidar-qa-mvp
description
Rail LiDAR QA MVP - Local LiDAR quality validation for railway infrastructure using drone simulation, point cloud metrics, and 3D visualization.
version
1
created
2026-05-30T00:00:00.000Z
updated
2026-05-30T00:00:00.000Z
source
https://github.com/Ntizar/rail-lidar-qa-mvp
tags
["data-science","lidar","railway","QA"]
# Rail LiDAR QA MVP ## Overview A local tool for validating LiDAR quality on railway infrastructure. Simulates drone flights over a PNOA LiDAR point cloud to detect coverage gaps, low-density zones, and shadow areas. ## Workflow 1. User loads `.laz` point cloud file 2. System reads point cloud and calculates general metrics 3. User selects analysis zone (e.g., 20m track + embankment) 4. Tool divides zone into 2D grid 5. For each cell: calculates density, elevation range, coverage 6. Simulates multiple drone passes from different positions 7. Generates QA map with color coding 8. Demo shows if capture is acceptable or needs repetition ## Drone Pass Strategy | Pass | Coverage | Purpose | |------|----------|---------| | P1 | Track axis | Global view of platform, track, ballast, embankment | | P2 | Right flank | Reduce shadows on embankment face, ditch, ballast edge | | P3 | Left flank | Confirm doubtful zones, improve density continuity | | P4 | Adaptive (optional) | Target red cells after P1-P3 | ## QA Traffic Light - **Green**: Sufficient density and continuous coverage - **Yellow**: Partial coverage, irregular density, needs review - **Red**: Gap, shadow, low density, insufficient capture ## Minimum Metrics - Total point count - Bounding box X/Y/Z - Elevation range - Mean points per square meter - Green cell percentage - Yellow cell percentage - Red cell percentage - QA score 0-100 ## Math Model ``` eje_via = principal_eigenvector(covariance(X, Y)) s = longitudinal projection on eje_via d = transverse projection on normal_via ``` Error reduction per pass: ``` e_i,k+1 = max(e_floor, e_i,k * (1 - g_k * visibility_i,k)) + anomaly_i ``` Planner prioritizes cells with highest residual error for adaptive P4. ## Tech Stack - Python: `laspy`, `lazrs` (LAZ reading), `numpy` (grid metrics) - Three.js: 3D point cloud visualization - Local HTTP server (Python stdlib) - Windows launcher (`run_mvp.bat`) ## Color Classification Points are classified visually: - Green: Vegetation (high NIR response) - Dark gray: Track/platform - Ochre: Ballast/substructure - Brown: Natural terrain/embankment - Dark blue: Shadow/occlusion/water ## European Sovereignty Narrative - Galileo Open Service as GNSS base - Galileo HAS for PPP high-precision corrections - EGNOS for operational integrity layer - Local processing, no external cloud - PNOA LiDAR (CNIG) as free base data ## Static Demo Generation ```bat python src\build_static.py ``` Creates `docs/` with Three.js viewer, preprocessed `sample_analysis.json`, and HTML report. Publishable to GitHub Pages or Vercel without uploading the `.laz` file. ## Pitfalls - MVP uses heuristic rules, not real AI - Track detection may be manual or configurable in v1 - Precision depends on sensor, GNSS, IMU, calibration, and pass geometry - Tool does NOT certify railway safety
Voir sur GitHub