slides

Test and deepen the load-bearing claims in a Marp presentation. Use when punchlines feel generic, causal claims are unsupported, conclusions overreach their evidence, trade-offs or boundary conditions are missing, or the audience cannot tell how an insight should change a decision.

Validate and prepare Marp slides for public release. Use before publishing or pushing changes that affect slide Markdown, themes, images, PDFs, README links, brand packs, or build configuration, especially when clean-clone reproducibility and source-to-artifact consistency matter.

Review a Marp presentation’s logical flow from the audience’s point of view. Use when checking section order, slide-to-slide reasoning, unanswered questions, hidden prerequisites, promise fulfillment, transitions, or whether a proposed reordering will make a talk easier to follow.

Review the narrative and audience-empathy design of a Marp presentation. Use when a technically correct talk feels flat, the opening lacks stakes, examples do not connect to the audience, tension or agency disappears, the ending lacks payoff, or proposed storytelling risks inventing personal experiences.

Coordinate and synthesize multiple specialist reviews of a Marp presentation into one coherent edit strategy. Use when a deck needs flow, claim depth, narrative, redundancy, and wit reviews together, or when specialist recommendations conflict over adding, cutting, moving, or rewriting slides.

Review humor, satire, irony, metaphor, and rhetorical wit in a Marp presentation for purpose, precision, speaker voice, audience fit, and context-collapse safety. Use when a talk contains jokes or playful phrasing, needs sharper memorable language, risks punching down or being misread in screenshots, or should remain serious without forced humor.

Find and safely remove redundancy in a Marp presentation while preserving comprehension, emphasis, pacing, and accessibility. Use when a deck is too long, repeats claims or examples, contains thin or overloaded slides, needs a target duration, or requires evidence-based cut, merge, compress, and keep decisions.