Skip to main content

agri-pipeline

Master orchestrator for the whole agricultural research-to-publication workflow, run as a senior agricultural scientist. Coordinates the agri skills — journal selection, research (agri-research or agri-deep-research), writing and analysis (agri-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review (agri-review), revision and finalization — into one governed path with quality gates. Same machinery as food-pipeline, grounded in agriculture and multidisciplinary literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided). Use when the user wants the entire agricultural process managed end to end. Triggers: run the full agricultural paper workflow, take my field trial from research to submission, manage my whole agronomy project, agricultural research to publication, end-to-end agriculture paper.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition
Dernière activité de la source
17 juillet 2026 à 01:49
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
32
Forks
3

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
agri-pipeline
description
Master orchestrator for the whole agricultural research-to-publication workflow, run as a senior agricultural scientist. Coordinates the agri skills — journal selection, research (agri-research or agri-deep-research), writing and analysis (agri-paper), figures (food-figure), peer review (agri-review), revision and finalization — into one governed path with quality gates. Same machinery as food-pipeline, grounded in agriculture and multidisciplinary literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided). Use when the user wants the entire agricultural process managed end to end. Triggers: run the full agricultural paper workflow, take my field trial from research to submission, manage my whole agronomy project, agricultural research to publication, end-to-end agriculture paper.
metadata
{"version":"1.0.0","verified":"2026-07","delegates_to":"food-pipeline","related_skills":["agri-research","agri-deep-research","agri-paper","agri-review","food-figure","journal-selector","food-pipeline"],"references":["../agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md"]}
# Agri-Pipeline — Research-to-Publication for Agricultural Science **Run the `food-pipeline` skill exactly** — its subagents (`intake_router`, `quality_gate`), its **stages 0–6**, its quality gates, its mode advisor, and its review/revision authorization defaults — with the agriculture substitutions in [`agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md`](../agri-research/references/agriculture-domain.md). Read that file first. No new machinery here. ## The substitutions 1. **Persona** — a **senior agricultural scientist of the specific discipline**, carried into every stage and every skill it dispatches (domain §2). 2. **Route to the `agri-*` skills**, not the food ones: | Stage | Skill | |---|---| | 0 · ROUTE | `intake_router` + `journal-selector` (agriculture coverage map) | | 1 · RESEARCH | **`agri-research`** (or **`agri-deep-research`**) | | 2 · WRITE | **`agri-paper`** → figures via **`food-figure`** (domain-neutral) | | 3 · REVIEW | **`agri-review`** | | 4 · REVISE | **`agri-paper`** (revise) | | 5 · RE-REVIEW | **`agri-review`** (re-review) | | 6 · FINALIZE | **`agri-paper`** (format-convert) | 3. **Evidence base** — Tier 1 Q1/Q2 agriculture + Nature/Science/Cell/PNAS + Q1/Q2 adjacent disciplines; Q3 for gaps; **Q4 avoided** (domain §3). `food-figure` is used directly and deliberately — it is domain-neutral and already renders at the journal spec. ## Inherited unchanged (not optional) - **Journal resolved once** at ROUTE via `journal-selector` and passed to every downstream skill, so none re-asks. - **Knowledge reuse:** when Stage 1 runs, its evidence base is carried into Stages 3/5 so `agri-review` does **not** re-search the field — it reuses it and tops up with `agri-research` **quick brief** key reviews read in full. - **Review/revision defaults:** **one** review→revise round; a second round **and** in-place Tracked Changes on the original Word file each require **explicit author authorization**. - **Deliverables — exactly two files, both `.docx`:** one **manuscript**, and **one `Review_and_Response_Report_<slug>_<date>.docx`** carrying **both the reviewer feedback and the editing response** — `agri-review` writes the feedback at Stage 3, `agri-paper` fills each `Response (type)` into that **same file** at Stage 4, and an authorized round 2 appends `R2-*` items to it. **No separate reviewer report, no standalone response letter, never Markdown** (`food-review/references/report-format.md`). - Quality gates, anti-fabrication grounding, four-gate citations, privacy scan, `human-writing.md`, and the **mandatory AI-use disclosure**. ## Agricultural gates (domain §5) At the Stage-2 gate, do not pass a manuscript that omits **the experimental unit**, field-trial reporting (site, season/years, soil, cultivar, design, replication), or ethics/**ARRIVE** for animal work — these are the flaws that end agricultural papers at review.
Voir sur GitHub