- name
- bash-scripting
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent bash scripting with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"bash-scripting, bash scripting, how do i bash-scripting, orchestrate bash-scripting, automate bash-scripting, agent bash-scripting","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Bash Scripting
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for bash scripting workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Pattern 1: Bash Scripting with Early Exit & Input Validation
# Implements Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Make Illegal States Unrepresentable)
set -euo pipefail
SCRIPT_NAME="$(basename "$0")"
LOG_FILE="/var/log/${SCRIPT_NAME}.log"
# Guard clause: Validate required arguments immediately (Law 1)
if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
echo "Usage: $SCRIPT_NAME <target_dir> <backup_prefix>" >&2
exit 1
fi
TARGET_DIR="$1"
BACKUP_PREFIX="$2"
# Validate state: Ensure target exists and is a directory (Law 2)
if [[ ! -d "$TARGET_DIR" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: Target directory '$TARGET_DIR' does not exist or is not a directory." >&2
exit 2
fi
# Parse and sanitize inputs - create immutable state snapshot
TIMESTAMP=$(date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S)
BACKUP_NAME="${BACKUP_PREFIX}_${TIMESTAMP}.tar.gz"
BACKUP_PATH="${TARGET_DIR}/backups/${BACKUP_NAME}"
# Create backup directory if missing (atomic state transition)
mkdir -p "${TARGET_DIR}/backups"
# Execute core logic with strict error handling
echo "Starting backup of ${TARGET_DIR} to ${BACKUP_PATH}..."
if tar -czf "$BACKUP_PATH" -C "$(dirname "$TARGET_DIR")" "$(basename "$TARGET_DIR")"; then
echo "SUCCESS: Backup completed at $(date)"
# Log success with metadata for audit trail
echo "$(date -Iseconds) | SUCCESS | ${BACKUP_NAME}" >> "$LOG_FILE"
else
echo "ERROR: tar command failed with exit code $?" >&2
exit 3
fi
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```bash
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Pattern 2: Bash Execution with Fallback Chain & Retry Logic
# Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) and adaptive fallback routing
set -euo pipefail
MAX_RETRIES=3
RETRY_DELAY=2
# Function: Execute primary command with retry logic
execute_with_retry() {
local cmd="$1"
local attempt=0
while (( attempt < MAX_RETRIES )); do
if eval "$cmd"; then
return 0
fi
attempt=$((attempt + 1))
if (( attempt < MAX_RETRIES )); then
echo "WARNING: Attempt $attempt failed. Retrying in ${RETRY_DELAY}s..." >&2
sleep "$RETRY_DELAY"
fi
done
return 1
}
# Fallback chain implementation
run_fallback_chain() {
local primary_cmd="$1"
local fallback_cmd="$2"
local critical_task="$3"
# Attempt primary execution
if execute_with_retry "$primary_cmd"; then
echo "Primary execution succeeded."
return 0
fi
echo "Primary execution exhausted retries. Initiating fallback chain..." >&2
# Level 1: Retry with adjusted parameters (e.g., reduced concurrency)
local adjusted_cmd="${primary_cmd} --concurrency=1"
if execute_with_retry "$adjusted_cmd"; then
echo "Fallback Level 1 (adjusted parameters) succeeded."
return 0
fi
# Level 2: Try alternative command/skill
if [[ -n "$fallback_cmd" ]]; then
if execute_with_retry "$fallback_cmd"; then
echo "Fallback Level 2 (alternative command) succeeded."
return 0
fi
fi
# Level 3: Critical task failure - escalate to human operator
if [[ "$critical_task" == "true" ]]; then
echo "CRITICAL: All fallbacks exhausted. Escalating to human operator." >&2
# Trigger alert mechanism
curl -s -X POST "https://hooks.example.com/alert" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"task\":\"$primary_cmd\",\"status\":\"failed\",\"escalated\":true}" || true
return 2
fi
echo "ERROR: All fallbacks failed. Task aborted." >&2
return 1
}
# Example usage
# run_fallback_chain "rsync -a /data /backup" "cp -r /data /backup" "false"
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Define clear input/output contracts for every step in the orchestration flow with explicit validation
- Implement structured logging at each stage capturing context, inputs, outputs, timing, and errors
- Build in fallback paths: if the primary strategy fails, degrade gracefully to a simpler approach
- Validate all preconditions before starting — do not proceed if required resources or permissions are missing
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create deep nesting of orchestration steps (>5 levels) — flatten workflows where possible
- Avoid silent failure modes: every step must either succeed, fail explicitly, or escalate to a higher handler
- Never use shared mutable state between parallel workflow branches — communicate via immutable messages only
- Do not hardcode execution order when the dependency graph naturally determines it; derive order from explicit dependencies
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
Voir sur GitHub