Skip to main content

circleci-automation

Implements intelligent circleci automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Informations de source

Dépôt
paulpas/agent-skill-router
Dernière activité de la source
4 juin 2026 à 23:31
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
6
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
circleci-automation
compatibility
opencode
completeness
95
content-types
["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
description
Implements intelligent circleci automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license
MIT
maturity
stable
metadata
{"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"circleci-automation, circleci automation, how do i circleci-automation, orchestrate circleci-automation, automate circleci-automation, agent circleci-automation, continuous integration, jenkins","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
version
1.0.0
# Circleci Automation Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for circleci automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability. ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation - Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores - Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions - Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution - Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution - Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting - Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks ## When NOT to Use Avoid this skill for: - Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead - High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive - Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements - Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable ## Core Workflow 1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. **Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding. 2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm: - Text similarity between request and skill triggers - Historical success rate for similar tasks - Skill availability and health status - Required dependencies and their availability **Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold. 3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. **Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated. 4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. **Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail. 5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain: - Retry with adjusted parameters - Try alternative skill from `related-skills` - Defer to human operator for critical tasks **Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata. ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic ```python def select_circleci_workflow( project_slug: str, branch: str, workflow_config: Dict, min_confidence: float = 0.7 ) -> Optional[Dict]: """Select optimal CircleCI workflow configuration for a given project and branch. Uses multi-factor scoring based on: - Branch protection rules and workflow compatibility - Historical pipeline success rates for similar configurations - CircleCI API availability and rate limit status - Required orbs and executor compatibility Args: project_slug: CircleCI project slug (e.g., github/owner/repo) branch: Target branch for pipeline execution workflow_config: Proposed workflow configuration dict min_confidence: Minimum confidence threshold (0.0-1.0) Returns: Validated workflow configuration with execution metadata or None """ # Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1) if not project_slug or not branch: raise ValueError("Project slug and branch are required") # Parse input - Make Illegal States Unrepresentable (Law 2) validated_config = _validate_circleci_config(workflow_config) api_status = _check_circleci_api_health() if not api_status.get("available"): return None best_workflow = None best_score = 0.0 for workflow in _get_available_workflows(project_slug, branch): score = _calculate_workflow_match(validated_config, workflow) if score > best_score and score >= min_confidence: best_score = score best_workflow = workflow if best_workflow is None: return None # Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate result = dict(best_workflow) result["selected_confidence"] = best_score result["trigger_timestamp"] = time.time() result["project_slug"] = project_slug return result ``` ### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback ```python def execute_circleci_pipeline( workflow: Dict, project_slug: str, branch: str, max_retries: int = 2 ) -> Dict: """Execute a CircleCI pipeline with CI/CD-specific fallback chain. Implements Fail Fast, Fail Loud principle (Law 4): - Invalid workflow configs halt immediately - API rate limits trigger exponential backoff - Workflow failures trigger artifact inspection and manual review fallback Args: workflow: Selected workflow configuration project_slug: Target CircleCI project branch: Target branch max_retries: Maximum retry attempts for transient API errors Returns: Pipeline execution result with status, logs URL, and confidence """ # Guard clause - validate workflow (Early Exit) if not _is_workflow_valid(workflow): raise SkillExecutionError(f"Invalid workflow config: {workflow.get('name', 'unknown')}") # Parse context - Ensure trusted state (Law 2) validated_params = _validate_pipeline_params(project_slug, branch, workflow) for attempt in range(max_retries + 1): try: # Trigger pipeline via CircleCI API response = circleci_api.trigger_pipeline( project_slug=project_slug, branch=branch, config=workflow ) pipeline_id = response.get("id") # Monitor pipeline status with timeout status = _wait_for_pipeline_completion(pipeline_id, timeout=1800) # Success - Atomic Predictability (Law 3) return { "success": True, "pipeline_id": pipeline_id, "status": status, "logs_url": f"https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/{pipeline_id}", "attempts": attempt + 1, "latency_ms": _calculate_latency() } except RateLimitError as e: # Transient API error - retry with backoff if attempt == max_retries: return _apply_circleci_fallback(workflow, project_slug, branch) time.sleep(2 ** attempt) except WorkflowFailureError as e: # Workflow failed - inspect artifacts and logs artifacts = _fetch_pipeline_artifacts(pipeline_id) if artifacts.get("critical_failure"): raise SkillExecutionError( f"Pipeline {pipeline_id} failed critical checks: {e}" ) from e # All retries exhausted - Fail Loud (Law 4) raise SkillExecutionError( f"Failed to execute CircleCI pipeline after {max_retries + 1} attempts" ) ``` ### MUST DO - Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit) - Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human) - Log all skill selections with full context for auditability - Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability) - Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states - Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing - Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic ### MUST NOT DO - Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score) - Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems - Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution - Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure - Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable - Cache skill selections without considering context changes ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ## TL;DR for Code Generation - Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work - Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects - Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger - Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit) - Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects - Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data - Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic - Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values ## Output Template When applying this skill, produce: 1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores 2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability) 3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies 4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order 5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact 6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios --- ## Constraints ### MUST DO - Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions - Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions - Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability - Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging ### MUST NOT DO - Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again - Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates - Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation - Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues ## Related Skills | Skill | Purpose | |
Voir sur GitHub