Skip to main content

git-pr-workflows-onboard

Implements intelligent git pr workflows onboard with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense

Informations de source

Dépôt
paulpas/agent-skill-router
Dernière activité de la source
4 juin 2026 à 23:31
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
7
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
git-pr-workflows-onboard
compatibility
opencode
completeness
95
content-types
["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
description
Implements intelligent git pr workflows onboard with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
license
MIT
maturity
stable
metadata
{"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"git-pr-workflows-onboard, git pr workflows onboard, how do i git-pr-workflows-onboard, orchestrate git-pr-workflows-onboard, automate git-pr-workflows-onboard, agent git-pr-workflows-onboard","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
version
1.0.0
# Git Pr Workflows Onboard Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for git pr workflows onboard workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability. ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Orchestration Flow │ └───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ User Request ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Parse Request │ │ & Extract │ │ Features │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Evaluate Available Skills │ │ │ │ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │ │ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │ │ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ │ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │ │ ↓ │ │ Select Best Skill │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Execute Skill │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────┐ │ Handle Result │ └────────┬────────┘ ↓ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Error Handling & Fallback │ │ │ │ Success? ────────► Return Result │ │ │ │ Fail? ────────┐ │ │ ↓ │ │ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ │ │ Fallback Chain │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │ │ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │ │ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │ │ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation - Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores - Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions - Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution - Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution - Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting - Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks ## When NOT to Use Avoid this skill for: - Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead - High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive - Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements - Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable ## Core Workflow 1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input. **Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding. 2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm: - Text similarity between request and skill triggers - Historical success rate for similar tasks - Skill availability and health status - Required dependencies and their availability **Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold. 3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence. **Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated. 4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic. **Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail. 5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain: - Retry with adjusted parameters - Try alternative skill from `related-skills` - Defer to human operator for critical tasks **Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata. ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic ```python def analyze_pr_context_and_route( pr_metadata: Dict[str, Any], repo_config: Dict[str, Any], available_onboarding_skills: List[Dict], min_confidence: float = 0.75 ) -> Optional[Dict]: """Route PR onboarding tasks to optimal sub-skill based on workflow context. Applies Law 1 (Early Exit) and Law 2 (Parse at Boundary) to validate PR state before scoring against available onboarding capabilities. """ if not pr_metadata.get("branch_name") or not pr_metadata.get("base_branch"): raise ValueError("PR must have branch_name and base_branch defined") if not repo_config.get("branch_protection_rules"): raise ValueError("Repository must have branch protection rules configured") # Parse PR type and extract workflow features at boundary title_lower = pr_metadata.get("title", "").lower() labels = pr_metadata.get("labels", []) is_hotfix = any("hotfix" in lbl for lbl in labels) or "hotfix" in title_lower requires_review = repo_config.get("required_reviewers", 0) > 0 ci_required = repo_config.get("required_status_checks", False) workflow_features = { "is_hotfix": is_hotfix, "requires_review": requires_review, "ci_required": ci_required, "auto_merge_eligible": not is_hotfix and not requires_review and ci_required } best_skill = None best_score = 0.0 for skill in available_onboarding_skills: # Multi-factor scoring: workflow match + repo compliance + historical success workflow_match = 1.0 if skill["trigger_patterns"].get("pr_type") == (is_hotfix and "hotfix" or "standard") else 0.5 compliance_score = 1.0 if all(skill["requirements"].get(k) <= v for k, v in workflow_features.items()) else 0.0 historical_weight = skill.get("success_rate", 0.5) composite_score = (workflow_match * 0.4) + (compliance_score * 0.3) + (historical_weight * 0.3) if composite_score > best_score and composite_score >= min_confidence: best_score = composite_score best_skill = skill if best_skill is None: return None # Law 3: Return new structure, never mutate inputs return { "routed_skill": best_skill["name"], "confidence": best_score, "workflow_context": workflow_features, "timestamp": time.time() } ``` ### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback ```python def execute_pr_onboarding_with_fallback( routed_skill: Dict, pr_context: Dict, repo_state: Dict, max_retries: int = 2 ) -> Dict: """Execute PR onboarding workflow with domain-specific fallback chain. Implements Law 4 (Fail Fast, Fail Loud) by validating repo state before attempting configuration changes. Falls back gracefully when CI/CD or branch protection rules block automated onboarding. """ required_perms = routed_skill.get("required_permissions", []) if not all(perm in repo_state.get("user_permissions", []) for perm in required_perms): raise PermissionError(f"Insufficient permissions for {routed_skill['name']}: {required_perms}") validated_context = { "pr_id": pr_context["pr_id"], "base_branch": pr_context["base_branch"], "head_branch": pr_context["head_branch"], "auto_approve": pr_context.get("auto_approve", False) } for attempt in range(max_retries + 1): try: # Attempt primary onboarding action: configure CODEOWNERS, CI, and branch rules changes_made = [] if validated_context["auto_approve"]: changes_made.append("auto_approve_enabled") if repo_state.get("ci_configured") is False: changes_made.append("ci_pipeline_initialized") return { "success": True, "skill_executed": routed_skill["name"], "configuration_applied": changes_made, "attempts": attempt + 1, "latency_ms": time.time() * 1000 } except BranchProtectionError as e: # Law 4: Fail immediately on immutable repo constraints raise OnboardingError(f"Branch protection blocks auto-onboarding: {e}") from e except CIConfigError as e: # Transient CI failure - apply fallback chain if attempt == max_retries: return { "success": False, "fallback_triggered": True, "fallback_action": "manual_review_template_generated", "reason": str(e), "attempts": attempt + 1 } raise OnboardingError(f"Failed to onboard PR after {max_retries + 1} attempts") ``` ### MUST DO - Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit) - Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human) - Log all skill selections with full context for auditability - Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability) - Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states - Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing - Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic ### MUST NOT DO - Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score) - Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems - Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution - Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure - Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable - Cache skill selections without considering context changes ## TL;DR Checklist - [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2) - [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1) - [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4) - [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3) - [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions - [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail - [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection - [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning ## TL;DR for Code Generation - Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work - Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects - Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger - Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit) - Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects - Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data - Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic - Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values ## Output Template When applying this skill, produce: 1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores 2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability) 3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies 4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order 5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact 6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios ## Related Skills | Skill | Purpose | | --- --- ## Constraints ### MUST DO - Validate branch naming conventions and PR scope before creating pull requests — enforce repository-level policies - Require all CI checks to pass before merging; never allow bypass of required status checks without codeowner approval - Implement automated changelog generation from commit messages using conventional commits format - Maintain linear history via rebase on main branch; avoid merge commits except for release branches ### MUST NOT DO - Do not force-push to shared or protected branches — only the original author may force-push their own feature branch - Avoid squashing all commits during PR review when historical commit context is valuable for understanding evolution - Never skip required code reviews regardless of how small the change appears — automation cannot assess architectural impact - Do not create PRs larger than 400 lines of net changes without explicit approval from a senior reviewer ## Live References > Authoritative documentation links for this skill's domain. The model follows markdown links at load time to resolve external references and inline content. - [Onboarding Guide for Open Source (Open Source Guides)](<https://opensource.guide/how-to-contribute/>) - [GitHub CODEOWNERS Documentation](<https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners>) - [GitHub Issue Templates](<https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/syntax-for-issue-forms>) - [Contribution Guidelines Template (CONTRIBUTING.md)](<https://docs.github.com/en/communities/setting-up-your-project-for-healthy-contributions/setting-guidelines-for-repository-contributors>) - [First-Timers Only Help](<https://www.firsttimersonly.com/>)
Voir sur GitHub