Use when approved requirements involve devices, sensors, gateways, edge processing or operational technology and need end-to-end connectivity, identity, lifecycle, safety and fleet operations; use HLD for the wider system context.
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Use when approved requirements involve devices, sensors, gateways, edge processing or operational technology and need end-to-end connectivity, identity, lifecycle, safety and fleet operations; use HLD for the wider system context.
A connected product must be designed from device constraints through cloud and operations.
Do Not Use When
Do not use for ordinary web or mobile clients, or when device safety, connectivity and lifecycle evidence is unavailable.
Required Inputs
Artefact
Source or provider
Required?
Missing behaviour
Device capabilities, environment and safety constraints
Hardware, domain and requirements owners
Required
Stop on unknown safety-critical limits or regulatory obligations.
Connectivity, fleet scale and cloud integration
Network, platform and operations owners
Required
Model offline operation when live network evidence is unavailable.
Workflow
Read the named inputs and confirm their approval, version and unresolved decisions.
Apply the decision rules below before drafting; stop on a missing authority, unsafe assumption or unresolved scope driver.
Produce the IoT System Design through the existing domain procedure and load only the references needed for the chosen branch.
Trace each material statement in the IoT System Design to an input, decision or explicitly qualified assumption.
Verify the observable acceptance conditions, record unassessed checks, and hand the artefacts to their named consumers.
If validation fails, recover by correcting the source decision or artefact and rerun the affected check; do not weaken the acceptance condition.
Outputs
Artefact
Consumer
Observable acceptance condition
IoT System Design
Firmware, edge, cloud, security, test and fleet operations teams
Identity, provisioning, telemetry, commands, offline behaviour, update, decommissioning, observability and failure recovery are specified end to end.
Evidence Produced
Evidence
Consumer
Acceptance condition
Source and decision trace
Reviewer and downstream owner
Each material statement cites an approved input, named decision or qualified open issue.
Completed verification record
Release or phase gate owner
Every applicable check records pass/fail; unavailable checks remain not assessed.
Capability and permission boundaries
Read-only is the default for analysis, review, evaluation and planning. Read and search access to authorised project artefacts are required. Editing is limited to an explicitly requested project deliverable. Execution may run document, syntax or validation checks. Network access is used only for facts that require current verification. Do not publish, spend, change production, approve policy, or claim certification without explicit authority.
Degraded mode
If any required capability is unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified IoT System Design draft plus a gap register showing the missing item, affected sections, risk and owner. Never convert an unassessed check into a pass.
Decision Rules
Choice
Action
Failure or risk avoided
Safety or latency needs local action
Place the rule at device/edge with safe fallback
Cloud outage does not create unsafe behaviour
Data is non-urgent and bandwidth constrained
Buffer, batch and reconcile
Connectivity cost and loss are controlled
Quality Standards
Preserve repository terminology and trace every material choice to project context.
Use deterministic acceptance conditions; replace vague quality claims with an observable check, threshold or named approval.
Cover error, empty, edge, recovery and operational cases relevant to this skill.
Verify standards, citations, APIs and package names before relying on them; qualify what cannot be checked.
Stop release for a failed safety, security, legal, financial, accessibility or data-integrity gate.
Anti-Patterns
Treating a device as an always-online API client. Fix: design buffering and reconnection.
Sharing fleet credentials. Fix: use per-device identity and rotation.
Omitting failed-update recovery. Fix: specify signed updates, rollback and safe mode.
Sending every sample to cloud. Fix: filter and aggregate against use cases.
Ending lifecycle at deployment. Fix: specify monitoring, replacement and decommissioning.
This skill extends Phase 03 for systems that include connected devices, sensors, gateways, edge processors, or operational technology integration. It turns verified requirements into an IoT-specific design that covers the full path from device behavior through edge or gateway coordination to cloud services, analytics, and lifecycle management.
When to Use
When the solution includes devices, sensors, actuators, wearables, kiosks, controllers, or gateways
When connectivity is intermittent, bandwidth-constrained, or cost-sensitive
When firmware, over-the-air updates, provisioning, or fleet management must be designed
When the product crosses IT and OT boundaries and needs explicit safety, reliability, or physical-environment assumptions
IEEE 1016, IoT architecture and secure-device lifecycle practices
Core Instructions
Step 1: Establish the IoT Context
Document:
device classes and roles
physical operating environment
user and operator interactions
telemetry and command flows
safety, latency, and resilience expectations
Step 2: Define End-to-End Architecture
Describe the architecture across:
device layer
gateway or edge layer
connectivity layer
cloud or platform layer
application and analytics layer
State what processing occurs locally, at the edge, and in the cloud, and why.
Step 3: Model Connectivity and Data Flow
Specify:
communication protocols and why they fit
expected message frequency and payload shape
offline behavior and buffering strategy
command acknowledgement and retry behavior
ingestion, normalization, storage, and retention approach
Step 4: Define Device Identity and Security
Document:
provisioning and enrollment flow
device identity and credential handling
secure boot or hardware trust assumptions if applicable
encryption in transit and at rest
access control for device, operator, and service interactions
key rotation, revocation, and incident response
Step 5: Define Device Lifecycle Management
Cover:
manufacturing or initial registration assumptions
configuration management
OTA firmware or software updates
rollback and staged rollout strategy
decommissioning and data sanitization
Step 6: Address Reliability, Safety, and Operations
Define:
failure modes and safe-state behavior
monitoring and fleet health metrics
diagnostics and remote troubleshooting
serviceability constraints for field operations
dependencies on third-party networks or hardware vendors
Step 7: Generate Output
Write projects/<ProjectName>/<phase>/<document>/IoT_System_Design.md with architecture, connectivity, security, lifecycle, operational model, and traceability back to the source requirements.
Common Pitfalls
Assuming persistent connectivity when the device context does not support it
Designing cloud-only control paths for safety-critical or latency-sensitive actions
Ignoring secure provisioning and credential rotation
Treating firmware updates as a release detail instead of a core architecture concern
Omitting field diagnostics, fleet segmentation, and rollback mechanisms
Verification Checklist
The device, edge, and cloud responsibilities are clearly separated.
Connectivity assumptions include offline and degraded modes.
Security design covers provisioning, identity, encryption, and revocation.
Lifecycle design covers onboarding, updates, rollback, and retirement.
Operational sections include observability, fleet health, and supportability.
Architectural decisions trace back to explicit product or requirements context.
