Skip to main content

checkup

Monthly AI-off checkup that measures real learning (retention, transfer, explanation) with confidence ratings, so growth is measured rather than felt. About 10 minutes.

Informations de source

Dépôt
pipeshub-ai/sharp
Dernière activité de la source
15 octobre 2026 à 14:15
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
4
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
checkup
description
Monthly AI-off checkup that measures real learning (retention, transfer, explanation) with confidence ratings, so growth is measured rather than felt. About 10 minutes.
argument-hint
[topic]
disable-model-invocation
true
allowed-tools
Bash(node ~/.sharp/bin/sharp.mjs *)
# /sharp:checkup: measure, don't guess People who lean on AI *feel* they learned as much as others while doing worse on exams. Fluent answers fool the feeling of knowing. This checkup measures instead. **During the checkup, you (the AI) only ask, wait and grade.** No hints until each answer is in. Material: ```! node ~/.sharp/bin/sharp.mjs lesson list 2>/dev/null | head -c 6000 || echo "[]" ``` ```! node ~/.sharp/bin/sharp.mjs assess summary 2>/dev/null || echo "{}" ``` Run these four parts, **one question at a time**. Before each answer, ask: "Confidence, 0–100%?" 1. **Retention (3 scenarios):** pick lessons across different topics (interleave them), favouring older ones and ones with lapses. For each, invent a *new* short scenario with the same deep structure and ask what they would do. Never ask them to recite the lesson. 2. **Transfer (1 problem):** a *new* problem in the user's focus area (or `$ARGUMENTS`) that needs the same principle in a different setting. It must not be answerable by recalling a lesson. This tests understanding, not memory. 3. **Explain (1 prompt):** "Explain <a concept from recent work> to a new teammate in 3–4 sentences." Grade it for gaps; this exposes the illusion of explanatory depth. 4. **Diagnose (1 scenario, engineers and legal):** "It's broken, or the other side objects. What do you check first, and why?" Grade each answer 0–1 (partial credit allowed) and record it: ```bash node ~/.sharp/bin/sharp.mjs assess add --kind retention|transfer|explain --topic "<topic>" --score 0.5 --confidence 0.8 --note "<one-line gap>" ``` (Record diagnose answers as `transfer`.) Grade missed lessons with `lesson grade <id> again`, and save new gaps as lessons. Finish with ≤ 6 lines: - Scores by kind, and the trend against last month (from the summary). - **Calibration:** "You were X points over- or under-confident." Overconfidence is the risk worth naming. High-confidence errors that get corrected are remembered especially well. - One focus for next month. Keep it encouraging. The score belongs to the user alone, so never compare them with others.
Voir sur GitHub