| name | mgnify |
| description | Use EMBL-EBI MGnify for analysed microbiome studies and biome genome catalogues (including UHGG / human-gut and other biomes). Use this skill when: (1) Browsing or citing MGnify analyses, (2) Downloading UHGG or other MGnify Genomes catalogues, (3) Searching genes/MAGs against catalogues, (4) Building comparison sets for MAG novelty. Upstream: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/ and https://github.com/EBI-Metagenomics. For raw reads use sra-ena. For taxonomy releases use gtdb. For routing use public-databases.
|
| license | MIT |
| category | utilities |
| tags | ["database","MGnify","UHGG","genome-catalogue","EBI"] |
| upstream | https://github.com/EBI-Metagenomics |
MGnify (incl. UHGG / biome catalogues)
Upstream: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/ ·
Docs: https://docs.mgnify.org/ ·
API: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/api/v1/ ·
Genomes FTP: https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/mgnify_genomes/ ·
Org: EBI-Metagenomics
Citation
Richardson, L. et al. MGnify: the microbiome sequence data analysis resource in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D753–D759 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1080
Almeida, A. et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 105–114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3
See also docs/references.md.
Analytical thinking
MGnify is not a replacement for your pipeline. It is:
- An archive of analysed microbiome runs (taxonomy/function under MGnify’s
pipeline versions)
- A set of biome-specific genome catalogues (species representatives +
protein catalogues), e.g. human-gut / UHGG
Use catalogues to contextualize your MAGs (novelty, species clusters,
protein families). Do not treat “found in UHGG” as proof of presence in your
sample without mapping/abundance evidence (coverm, profilers).
Catalogue QC/dereplication rules (CheckM thresholds, dRep ANI) are theirs —
state both their criteria and yours (mag-qc) when comparing.
Catalogue family (thinking)
MGnify Genomes publishes multiple biome catalogues (human-gut / UHGG is the
most cited; others cover e.g. oceans, various hosts/environments — check the
live FTP/API list). Each catalogue version has its own:
- species-representative set + all-genome metadata
- protein catalogues at several AA identity cutoffs
- sometimes prebuilt search indexes (Kraken2, etc.)
Cross-catalogue rules:
| Claim | Do |
|---|
| Novelty in human gut | Compare to current UHGG / human-gut catalogue version |
| Non-gut biome | Use the matching biome catalogue, not UHGG alone |
| Global taxonomy | Still run gtdbtk on your MAGs; catalogue labels are secondary |
| Presence in my sample | Map/profile (coverm, MetaPhlAn, …) — catalogue hit ≠ local detection |
MGnify analyses of public studies use MGnify pipeline versions — their
taxonomy/function tables are not interchangeable with your MetaPhlAn/HUMAnN
run unless you intentionally reanalyse the same ENA runs.
Prerequisites
| Need | Resource |
|---|
| Browse studies | MGnify web / API |
| Download MAG catalogue | FTP under mgnify_genomes/<biome>/<version>/ |
| Gene fragment search | MGnify COBS gene search |
| Whole-MAG similarity | MGnify Sourmash MAG search (-k 31 --scaled 1000) |
How to browse / API
curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metagenomics/api/v1/genome-catalogues/human-gut-v2-0-2" \
| python -m json.tool | head
Prefer the live catalogue ID/version from the website or API — do not hardcode
obsolete versions into Methods without checking.
How to download genome catalogues (FTP)
mkdir -p db/mgnify/human-gut && cd db/mgnify/human-gut
wget -c https://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/mgnify_genomes/human-gut/v2.0.2/genomes-all_metadata.tsv
Typical contents: species representatives, all-genomes metadata, protein
catalogues (100/95/90/50% AA), sometimes prebuilt Kraken2 indexes.
Key thinking for MAG studies
| Task | Approach |
|---|
| Is my MAG a known gut species? | Sourmash/Mash vs UHGG reps; or GTDB + literature |
| Cross-biome claim | Search the matching MGnify biome catalogue, not only human-gut |
| Functional comparison | Use protein catalogues carefully — AAI cutoffs change interpretation |
| Cite correctly | Catalogue name + version + FTP path + download date |
Decision tree
MGnify vs other public resources?
├─ Need raw FASTQ → sra-ena (MGnify often links ENA accessions)
├─ Need biome MAG / protein catalogue → mgnify
├─ Need global prokaryotic taxonomy release → gtdb
└─ Need marker/pathway indexes for profiling → biobakery-databases
Related skills
public-databases · sra-ena · gtdb · progenomes · cami · drep · coverm · gtdbtk · mag-qc · visualization