plan

name	plan
description	Plan mode: write markdown plan to .hermes/plans/, no exec.
version	1.0.0
author	Hermes Agent
license	MIT
platforms	["linux","macos","windows"]
metadata	{"hermes":{"tags":["planning","plan-mode","implementation","workflow"],"related_skills":["writing-plans","subagent-driven-development"]}}

Plan Mode

Use this skill when the user wants a plan instead of execution.

Core behavior

For this turn, you are planning only.

• Do not implement code.
• Do not edit project files except the plan markdown file.
• Do not run mutating terminal commands, commit, push, or perform external actions.
• You may inspect the repo or other context with read-only commands/tools when needed.
• Your deliverable is a markdown plan saved inside the active workspace under .hermes/plans/.

Output requirements

Write a markdown plan. Two modes — detect which one fits the user's framing:

Mode A: Implementation Plan (default)

When the user says "build X", "implement Y", "add feature Z" — produce a concrete, actionable implementation plan.

Include, when relevant:

• Goal
• Current context / assumptions
• Proposed approach
• Step-by-step plan
• Files likely to change
• Tests / validation
• Risks, tradeoffs, and open questions

Mode B: Comparative Analysis

When the user says "试试X", "考虑Y", "换成Z" (evaluating a technology/approach change) — produce a tradeoff analysis FIRST, not an implementation plan.

Include:

• Compared to: what the current approach is
• Pros / Cons table: dimensions like bundle size, features, maintenance, compatibility, licensing
• Migration effort: estimated work and risk areas
• Recommendation: recommend or recommend-against with clear reasoning
• Quick-check option: suggest trying on a branch to evaluate hands-on before committing

Choosing Mode B is a signal that the user wants to decide before committing. Save the analysis under .hermes/plans/, then wait for user direction before implementing.

If the user's intent is unclear between evaluating and implementing, ask: "要我做个对比分析还是直接写实施计划？"

Save location

Save the plan with write_file under:

• .hermes/plans/YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS-<slug>.md

Treat that as relative to the active working directory / backend workspace. Hermes file tools are backend-aware, so using this relative path keeps the plan with the workspace on local, docker, ssh, modal, and daytona backends.

If the runtime provides a specific target path, use that exact path. If not, create a sensible timestamped filename yourself under .hermes/plans/.

Interaction style

• If the request is clear enough, write the plan directly.
• If no explicit instruction accompanies /plan, infer the task from the current conversation context.
• If it is genuinely underspecified, ask a brief clarifying question instead of guessing.
• After saving the plan, reply briefly with what you planned and the saved path.
• If the target .hermes/plans/ directory doesn't exist or is unwritable, fall back to ~/.hermes/plans/.

Extended: Migration Analysis (Greenfield Rebuilds)

When the user asks to rebuild an existing codebase with a modern stack while preserving the original design — inventory the current codebase first (see references/migration-analysis.md), then combine Mode A + Mode B into a migration analysis document.

The reference covers the full methodology: inventory → keep/rewrite map → stack selection → design fidelity table → phased plan → risk assessment.