- name
- awesome-agentic-reasoning
- description
- A curated collection of research papers and resources on agentic reasoning for Large Language Models, organized by planning, tool use, search, self-evolution, and multi-agent systems.
- triggers
- ["show me agentic reasoning papers","find research on LLM planning and reasoning","what are the latest papers on AI agents","I need resources on multi-agent systems","explain agentic reasoning frameworks","find papers on tool use for LLMs","research on self-evolving AI agents","show me embodied agent benchmarks"]
# Awesome Agentic Reasoning
> Skill by [ara.so](https://ara.so) — AI Agent Skills collection.
This skill provides expertise in navigating and utilizing the **Awesome Agentic Reasoning** repository — a comprehensive, curated collection of research papers and resources on agentic reasoning for Large Language Models (LLMs). The repository is based on the survey paper "[Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models: A Survey](https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12538)" and organizes cutting-edge research into foundational reasoning, self-evolving systems, and multi-agent collaboration.
## What This Repository Provides
The Awesome Agentic Reasoning repository offers:
- **Categorized Research Papers**: Organized by thematic areas including planning, tool use, search, self-evolution, multi-agent systems, and real-world applications
- **Benchmarks**: Comprehensive lists of evaluation frameworks for agentic reasoning capabilities
- **Three-Layer Framework**:
- **Foundational Reasoning**: Core single-agent abilities (planning, tool-use, search)
- **Self-Evolving Reasoning**: Adaptation through feedback, memory, and learning
- **Collective Reasoning**: Multi-agent coordination and collaborative intelligence
- **Application Domains**: Math/coding agents, scientific discovery, embodied agents, healthcare, web exploration
- **Survey Materials**: Slides and the comprehensive survey paper
## Repository Structure
```
Awesome-Agentic-Reasoning/
├── README.md # Main curated list
├── CONTRIBUTING.md # Contribution guidelines
├── materials/ # Survey slides and materials
│ └── Agentic Reasoning Survey Talk.pdf
└── figs/ # Framework diagrams
├── overview.png
└── planning.png
```
## Navigating the Repository
### Main Categories
The repository organizes papers into three primary layers:
#### 1. Foundational Agentic Reasoning
**Planning Reasoning**:
- In-context Planning (workflow design, tree search)
- Post-training Planning (supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning)
**Tool-Use Optimization**:
- In-context Tool-Use (API orchestration, workflow design)
- Post-training Tool-Use (supervised learning, RL fine-tuning)
**Agentic Search**:
- In-context Search (web navigation, knowledge retrieval)
- Post-training Search (RL optimization)
#### 2. Self-Evolving Agentic Reasoning
- **Agentic Feedback Mechanisms**: Self-reflection, critique, and iterative refinement
- **Agentic Memory**: Short-term and long-term memory systems
- **Evolving Foundational Capabilities**: Continuous improvement of planning, tool-use, and search
#### 3. Collective Multi-Agent Reasoning
- **Role Taxonomy**: Debate, collaboration, hierarchical structures
- **Collaboration Patterns**: Division of labor, coordination strategies
- **Multi-Agent Memory and Evolution**: Shared knowledge, collective learning
### Applications
The repository covers real-world applications:
- 💻 **Math Exploration & Coding Agents**
- 🔬 **Scientific Discovery Agents**
- 🤖 **Embodied Agents**
- 🏥 **Healthcare & Medicine Agents**
- 🌐 **Autonomous Web Exploration & Research Agents**
### Benchmarks
Organized by:
- **Core Mechanisms**: Tool Use, Search, Memory & Planning, Multi-Agent Systems
- **Application Domains**: Embodied, Scientific Discovery, Medical, Web, General Tool-Use
## Usage Patterns
### Finding Papers on Specific Topics
**Example 1: Finding Planning Papers**
Navigate to the Planning Reasoning section to find papers on:
- Workflow design approaches (ReAct, ReWOO, Plan-and-Solve)
- Tree search methods (Tree of Thoughts, MCTS-based approaches)
- Post-training planning optimization
**Example 2: Multi-Agent System Research**
The Collective Multi-Agent Reasoning section includes:
- Role specialization papers
- Collaboration frameworks
- Multi-agent memory systems
### Exploring Application Domains
**Example: Embodied Agent Research**
1. Check the **Applications > Embodied Agents** section
2. Cross-reference with **Benchmarks > Embodied Agents** for evaluation frameworks
3. Review foundational papers on planning and tool-use that apply to embodied settings
### Finding Benchmarks
**Example: Evaluating Tool-Use Capabilities**
```markdown
## Tool Use Benchmarks
Navigate to: Benchmarks > Core Mechanisms > Tool Use
Key benchmarks include:
- API-Bank: API selection and execution
- ToolBench: Multi-tool orchestration
- T-Eval: Tool learning evaluation
```
## Contributing to the Repository
### Adding New Papers
Create a pull request with papers organized by category:
```markdown
| [Paper Title](https://arxiv.org/abs/XXXX.XXXXX) | Conference/Year |
```
**Guidelines**:
- Place papers in the appropriate thematic section
- Follow the existing table format
- Include the full arXiv link or conference proceedings URL
- Add the publication year or venue
### Suggesting Resources
Open an issue to suggest:
- New paper categories
- Additional benchmarks
- Application domains not yet covered
- Survey materials or tutorials
**Contact**:
- Email: twei10@illinois.edu, twli@illinois.edu, liu326@illinois.edu
- GitHub Issues: For suggestions and discussions
## Key Research Paradigms
### In-Context Reasoning vs. Post-Training Reasoning
The repository distinguishes between two optimization approaches:
**In-Context Reasoning**:
- Test-time scaling through structured orchestration
- Adaptive workflows without parameter updates
- Examples: ReAct, Tree of Thoughts, Chain-of-Thought prompting
**Post-Training Reasoning**:
- Behavior optimization via RL and supervised fine-tuning
- Parameter updates to internalize reasoning strategies
- Examples: RLHF for tool-use, Q-learning for planning
### Environmental Dynamics
Papers are organized by the environmental setting:
- **Static environments**: Fixed tool sets, deterministic outcomes
- **Dynamic environments**: Feedback loops, adaptation requirements
- **Multi-agent environments**: Coordination, communication, emergent behavior
## Working with Survey Materials
### Accessing the Survey Paper
The foundational survey is available at:
- arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12538
- HuggingFace Papers: https://huggingface.co/papers/2601.12538
### Using the Slides
Presentation materials are in `materials/Agentic Reasoning Survey Talk.pdf`:
- Framework overview
- Key insights from each reasoning layer
- Application case studies
- Future research directions
## Common Patterns
### Building a Research Bibliography
**Pattern: Comprehensive Literature Review**
```python
# Pseudo-code for extracting papers by category
categories = [
"Planning Reasoning",
"Tool-Use Optimization",
"Agentic Search",
"Multi-Agent Systems"
]
papers_by_category = {}
for category in categories:
# Navigate to README section
papers = extract_papers_from_section(category)
papers_by_category[category] = papers
# Generate BibTeX or reading list
```
### Tracking New Research
**Pattern: Monitoring Updates**
The repository is actively maintained. To stay current:
1. Watch the repository for updates
2. Check the News section in README for announcements
3. Review recent commits for newly added papers
4. Subscribe to GitHub notifications
### Cross-Referencing Applications and Benchmarks
**Pattern: Application-Specific Research**
For a specific application domain:
```markdown
1. Identify application section (e.g., "Healthcare & Medicine Agents")
2. Review papers in that section
3. Navigate to corresponding benchmark section
4. Check foundational techniques used (planning, tool-use, etc.)
5. Trace back to foundational reasoning sections for core methods
```
## Citation
When using this repository in research or projects:
```bibtex
@article{wei2026agentic,
title={Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models},
author={Wei, Tianxin and Li, Ting-Wei and Liu, Zhining and Ning, Xuying and Yang, Ze and Zou, Jiaru and Zeng, Zhichen and Qiu, Ruizhong and Lin, Xiao and Fu, Dongqi and others},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.12538},
year={2026}
}
```
## Integration with Development Workflows
### For Researchers
**Literature Review Workflow**:
1. Clone the repository for offline access
2. Use the categorized structure to identify relevant papers
3. Cross-reference applications with foundational techniques
4. Export citations for reference management tools
### For Practitioners
**Implementation Workflow**:
1. Identify your application domain (e.g., web agents, coding)
2. Review application-specific papers and benchmarks
3. Trace foundational techniques (planning, tool-use)
4. Reference implementation papers for code patterns
5. Evaluate using suggested benchmarks
### For Tool Builders
**Benchmark Selection**:
1. Determine core capability (planning, tool-use, search)
2. Navigate to corresponding benchmark section
3. Review evaluation frameworks and metrics
4. Compare agent performance across standard benchmarks
## Best Practices
### Exploring New Topics
1. **Start with the Overview**: Read the survey paper introduction and framework diagram
2. **Navigate by Layer**: Begin with foundational reasoning before advanced topics
3. **Cross-Reference**: Link application papers back to foundational techniques
4. **Check Benchmarks**: Understand evaluation standards for each capability
### Contributing Quality Additions
1. **Verify Relevance**: Ensure papers fit the agentic reasoning scope
2. **Check Duplicates**: Search existing entries before adding
3. **Provide Context**: Include venue/year information
4. **Follow Format**: Maintain consistent table structure
### Staying Current
1. **Monitor Commits**: The repository updates regularly with new papers
2. **Check News Section**: Major updates announced at the top of README
3. **Watch Discussions**: GitHub issues may highlight emerging trends
4. **Follow Survey Updates**: Authors plan continued improvements
## Troubleshooting
### Finding Specific Papers
**Issue**: Can't locate a specific paper
**Solution**:
- Use browser search (Ctrl+F / Cmd+F) on the README
- Check multiple related sections (papers may fit several categories)
- Review the benchmarks section for evaluation-focused papers
- Check recent commits if it's a new publication
### Understanding Categories
**Issue**: Unclear which section contains relevant papers
**Solution**:
- Refer to the framework overview diagram
- Read the category descriptions in the survey paper
- Cross-reference with similar known papers
- Check application sections if domain-specific
### Accessing Papers
**Issue**: Links not working or papers behind paywalls
**Solution**:
- Most papers link to arXiv versions (open access)
- For conference papers, search on Google Scholar
- Check author websites for preprints
- Use institutional access for published versions
## Related Resources
- **Survey Paper**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.12538
- **Presentation Slides**: `materials/Agentic Reasoning Survey Talk.pdf`
- **HuggingFace**: https://huggingface.co/papers/2601.12538
- **License**: MIT (open for use and contribution)
## Quick Reference
| Category | Key Papers | Benchmarks |
|----------|-----------|------------|
| Planning | Tree of Thoughts, ReAct, Plan-and-Solve | PlanBench, BlocksWorld |
| Tool-Use | Gorilla, ToolLLM, HuggingGPT | API-Bank, ToolBench |
| Search | WebGPT, Agent-E, Mind2Web | WebArena, GAIA |
| Multi-Agent | ChatDev, AgentVerse, MetaGPT | MAgIC, AgentBench |
| Embodied | LM-Nav, PERIA, RT-1 | CALVIN, MetaWorld |
| Scientific | FunSearch, AI Scientist | ScienceBench |
This skill enables AI coding agents to effectively navigate and utilize the Awesome Agentic Reasoning repository, helping developers access cutting-edge research on LLM-based agents, understand agentic reasoning frameworks, and apply state-of-the-art techniques to their projects.
Voir sur GitHub